Drillers See Triple-Digit Crude and Hit the Brakes

Yves here. Oil producers are well aware of the saying, “The cure for high oil prices is high oil price.” Sudden rises in energy costs and/or an unduly elevated level relative to other business and consumer costs produces what is too politely called demand destruction, as in spending cuts on a scale that reduce overall growth and with it, energy purchases. That can came about even more directly by customers overtly cutting their petroleum products consumption by driving less, using a motorbike rather than a car, getting an EV, setting thermostats so as to lower energy use. The time horizons for drillers to see their investment to increase output are too long for them to react to what may be comparatively short-term price moves.

By Irina Slav, a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry. Originally published at OilPrice

  • Despite high oil prices, U.S. drillers are hesitant to ramp up production due to extreme market and geopolitical uncertainty.
  • Companies prefer a wait-and-see approach, using current cash flows to repair balance sheets rather than commit to new drilling.
  • Industry fears prices could spike too high, triggering demand destruction and longer-term instability, especially with ongoing disruptions like the Strait of Hormuz.
  • Brent crude is trading over $100 per barrel, WTI has topped $90, but oil drillers in the world’s largest producer are cautious about their future plans. In fact, they are rather unhappy with the war in the Middle East, because it has made it harder to plan investments.

    On the face of it, everything is perfect, price-wise. WTI is trading much higher than what shale drillers need to be profitable. According to the latest Dallas Fed Energy Survey, the range of WTI profitable drilling price levels for the oil patch is between $62 per barrel for non-Permian shale, $68 per barrel for conventional oil, and $70 for parts of the Permian. Yet only 21% of the survey respondents said they planned to significantly increase the number of wells they plan to drill this year.

    According to a recent Wall Street Journal report, the reason is uncertainty. The report said that in private conversations with senior federal government officials on the sidelines of CERAWeek, oil and gas executives had demonstrated growing concern about the Middle Eastern situation and its impact on global energy security. Per the report, energy executives were growing frustrated with the messaging coming out of Washington, unwilling to share the upbeat tone of most of that messaging.

    “What they fail to understand is that daily tweets driving volatility in both the commodity market and the equity market isn’t good for anybody,” Kimmeridge managing partner Mark Viviano told the WSJ. “It’s just really difficult to make any kind of intelligent decisions in that environment,” he added.
    Meanwhile, one Dallas Fed Energy Survey respondent commented on the situation thus: “I think our operators are going to take a wait-and-see stance on any increased drilling plans to see how oil and gas prices fare over the next six months. We could all use what could be a short-term cash flow boost to repair balance sheets, reduce debt and get caught up on deferred but necessary capital spending, operating spending and general spending outside of drilling.”

    In other words, the price rally is making the industry nervous, but the additional cash is not unwelcome. The big question, of course, is how long the crisis will continue because the longer it continues, the worse the fallout will be.

    “There are very real, physical manifestations of the closure of the Strait of Hormuz that are working their way around the world and through the system that I don’t think are fully priced in,” Chevron’s chief executive Mike Wirth said at CERAWeek, putting things mildly. In fact, fuel shortages are already beginning to emerge in some Asian countries and, surprisingly to some, in Australia.

    It is perfectly normal for oil and gas executives to worry about the impact of the war on the price of the commodities they sell. After all, high prices are a good thing, but only up to a point. That point comes when prices go too high and start killing demand for those commodities. As Billy Bob Thornton’s character in “Landman” put it, “You want oil to live above 60 but below 90. And don’t get me wrong, we’re still printing money at 90, but… gas gets up over $3.50 a gallon, it starts to pinch.”

    Indeed, Wall Street Journal’s Ed Ballard argued in a recent report that the jump in LNG prices could be problematic for U.S. exporters. Ballard cited a recent remark by the CEO of Freeport LNG as saying, “It’s a scary thing, it’s not good for our industry,” referring to said price jump, which has already made some importers in Asia switch to coal, because it’s cheaper. Meanwhile, Europe and the rest of Asia are trying to outbid each other for whatever LNG cargoes are coming out of the U.S. Gulf Coast. For now, it seems the Asians are winning, with about a dozen cargoes originally destined for European buyers diverting to Asia over the past month. Yet analysts warn that it is only a matter of time before demand destruction begins.

    “A global gas market that was expected to be oversupplied (and cheap) will now become undersupplied (and expensive),” Eurasia Group said in a recent note, as quoted by the Wall Street Journal. Indeed, LNG on the spot market is fetching $24 per mmBtu, Pakistani officials said recently, comparing this to $9 per mmBtu under the country’s long-term deal with Qatar, which Qatar is currently unable to service.

    In oil, the consensus seems to be that things are not as bad. Yet that does not mean they are not bad, as suggested by some responses to the Dallas Fed survey. “The Strait of Hormuz adds complexity. Suppliers are already trying to increase pricing, and the administration continues to try to talk down [oil] prices. How sustainable are current oil prices? Hard to make long-term commitments or to “drill, baby, drill,” one respondent said. Another put it more succinctly: “Everyone is hoping and praying for a quick end to the war.”

    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

10 comments

  1. Louis Fyne

    Interesting that there is not one mention of “workers” or “labor” ….. labor market for oil workers was tight pre-war: combo of tough working conditions (closest thing to working on the frontier, along with lumberjacks) and you need a high-quality worker for physically demanding jobs.

    No 20 y.o. is suddenly going to give up studying accounting or sociology at uni. to work rigs—for what, at this stage, looks like a transient event

    1. David

      My experience of the oil industry for the last few years is that every event has been used to drive down wages and worker numbers. Everything is been done to drive down costs. Including a huge number of engineering roles being offshored to India. It would appear that high oil prices will also be used as an excuse to drive down costs.

  2. MicaT

    One aspect that isn’t often talked about is the lack of oil field workers which limits the amount of rigs they can field.
    And its not just those that work on the rigs, of which there are 3 crews for each rotation and then a whole other crew for the off rotation, along with trucks, specialty people, the mess and crew housing staff and the list goes on.
    Then you have to have the fracking crews come in which is a whole other big process, all of which are busy.

    So I imagine they can provide more crews but it’s not going to increase a whole lot from the roughly 543 oil and gas rigs that are operating right now. For example rig count is down 75 from last year this time with a major stated reason of increased efficiency of rig operations. And even if someone said yes let’s get 75 more rigs in operation, that will take some time, And it depends on if they are doing new wells, or refracking old wells.

    So yeah they will sit back and take the gains.

  3. Curious

    This makes me all the more nervous that the US is going to strike Iran knowing it will wipe out the Gulf. With that production/refining wiped out it will make sense for US to invest in new things (in the investor classes minds at least)

  4. LawnDart

    Yves, HELP.

    We won today– check inbox Wed. re; Medicare Advantage agents.

    Mother’s Day deadline.

    I need docs and lawyers tied into the feed.

    Yes I am posting publically because I really need your help!!!

      1. RedStapler

        Trump has inadvertently become EV salesman of the year.
        Unlike 1973, 79, Iran-Iraq Tanker war and Iraq yoinking Kuwait in 1990 a viable alternative exists to gas & diesel.
        Everyone who replaces a oil powered vehicle with a EV or PHEV is permanently lost as a customer.

        1. Holli

          And the justifiably correct and burgeoning number of Anti-War activists have become the best promoters of California governor candidate Chad Bianco.

          He’s long advocated for replacing the 80% of crude oil refined in California and taxed at its source, with all California sourced, and locally taxed. That money used to completely eliminate the state income tax.

          His rival, the Mayfairian Steve Hilton promotes a plan to reduce the income tax for those earning less than $100,000 a year.

          A fantasy circulating among former Trump supporters: the U.S. troops are actually heading toward Hormuz to overthrow the Israeli government.

  5. Paul W.

    Unintended consequences of war. Nations pivoting to coal. Nations with a large percentage of renewables looking good. Maybe more people in US will see the current administrations demonization of renewables as bad policy affecting the entire nation. I’m in North East and natural gas comes in on boats. I use it for heat. I have been thinking about a wood stove as a back up. I can sit in the dark with a flashlight, but I don’t like it when the house is less that 50 degrees. The state lost power for a week with an early snow fall with all the leaves out about 10 years ago. I put in a generator after that. All these changes in national policy so no business can plan for anything are starting to show up as failures in the economy. I’m not looking forward to the next year.

Comments are closed.