Category Archives: Corporate governance

Scrutiny of Pay Gap Between CEO and Direct Reports

The Financial Times reports today that institutional investors and the SEC are taking interest in the difficult-to-justify pay disparities between the CEO and his immediate subordinates at some public companies. And isolated data points, like Sallie Mae, suggest that the ones with the biggest gulf (in its case, ten times) aren’t delivering commensurate performance. A […]

Read more...

Countrywide Hires Expensive Cheerleader

Psychologists, when working with patients, need to differentiate between two types of people: internalizers and externalizers. Internalizers are very responsible and tend to blame themselves for Things That Happen, whether they are their fault or not. They fit well in jobs that demand professionalism and personal responsibility. By contrast, externalizers blame everyone else for their […]

Read more...

International Investors Tell SEC That US Corporate Governance is Too Weak

Ah, time for a reality check on the Wall Street Journal/Administration party line. Here we’ve been told how horrible Sarbanes-Oxley is, and how those tough corporate governance measures are bad for the competitiveness of US markets. Like many of the things the officialdom in Washington has been telling the public, this line of reasoning doesn’t […]

Read more...

Robert Reich: The Moral Hazard Double Standard

Robert Reich tells us that despite the talk about moral hazard, the rich have plenty of safety nets: The real moral hazard in this saga started when Fed Chair Ben Bernanke cut the Fed’s discount rate (charged on direct federal loans to banks) and announced that the Fed would take whatever action was needed to […]

Read more...

The Wall Street Journal Touts Dubious Research (CEO Performance Edition)

Will someone, please, teach the reporters at the Wall Street Journal the basics about scientific research? I know it’s hard finding stuff to write about day in, day out. But the story “Scholars Link Success of Firms To Lives of CEOs” is a travesty. The centerpiece of the article is a study by Morten Bennedsen, […]

Read more...

Hedge Funds: Good Activists?

Hedge funds, which even at their peak of popularity, were regarded with considerable suspicion, have taken a shellacking in the last few months as subprime tainted funds have folded or reported poor results, and “quant” strategies have failed spectacularly, due to extraordinary, allegedly unprecedented market turmoil. Of course, the problem with that defense is that […]

Read more...

William Lauder Needs a Lesson in What Being Public Means

I’m a bit late to this item from today’s Wall Street Journal because I generally skip its softball CEO interviews. However, they do give corporate leaders the opportunity to make unwitting self revelations. Here, Estee Laude rCEO William Lauder demonstrates that he could use a primer on the basics of public ownership: On the external […]

Read more...

Conference Board Review on Prejudice and the Glass Ceiling

Our colleague Susan Webber of Aurora Advisors has a new article, “Fit vs. Fitness,” in the current issue of The Conference Board Review. The editors were initially skeptical that anything new could be said on the subject of the glass ceiling, but this article persuaded them otherwise. We hope you’ll agree. She draws on personal […]

Read more...

Narcissistic CEOs Produce More Volatile Performance

This Penn State study, reported at PhysOrg.com, ascertained that narcissistic CEOs gravitate towards bold moves, like big acquisitions or marked changes in strategy, which leads to more variable (although no worse on average) performance. The interesting thing about this finding is the disconnect between Wall Street pressures and boardroom hiring practices. At least according to […]

Read more...

Sarbox Not Responsible for Decline in New York Market Competitiveness

Although I haven’t followed the debate over New York-London market competitiveness that closely, it was clear when the study on the US’s standing was commissioned, the sponsors already knew what answers they wanted to report, and emasculating Sarbanes-Oxley (Sarbox or SOX) was an idee fixe. It didn’t seem to occur to people like Hank Paulson […]

Read more...

Why Do Shareholders Let Corporate Acquirers Get Away With It?

If you are a public company, the odds say that buying another corporation is a bad idea. Academic studies have consistently found that most deals fail, and the reason most commonly cited it that the buyers overpay. Yet as with second marriages, the continued popularity of corporate M&A is a triumph of hope over experience. […]

Read more...

Towers Perrins Stonewalling Congress on CEO Pay Inquiry

In Saturday’s New York Times, Gretchen Morgenson reported that House Committee on Oversight and Reform had issued a subpoena to Towers Perrin, an executive compensation consulting firm, because it had failed to comply with an information request regarding potential conflicts of interest in its pay consulting business. Now because this was a news story, rather […]

Read more...

Could Bear Stearns Fail?

Before readers get too excited, let me be clear: this post is to discuss what circumstances might lead Bear Stearns to cease to be an independent organization. It is not an attempt to forecast the likelihood of that taking place. Despite their considerable prowess, investment banks are fragile organizations. It took only one major scandal […]

Read more...

Bear Stearns Investor Presentation: "Limited Subprime Exposure"

By happenstance, I came across a document, “Fixed Income Overview” from a May 29, 2007 Bear Stearns Investor Day presentation by Jeff Mayer, Co-Head of Global Fixed Income, and Tom Marano, Global Head of Mortgages and Asset Backed Securities on the Bear Stearns website. It’s a fascinating bit of reading and some parts are particularly […]

Read more...