Category Archives: Media watch

"Antidepressant drugs don’t work"

The headline above comes from the UK’s Independent. I could have picked number of variants (BBC, “Anti-depressants ‘of little use‘,” Financial Times, “Antidepressants ‘have no impact‘”), but what is interesting is that as of this hour, this study, published by the University of Hull, is getting MSM coverage solely in the UK and Commonwealth countries. […]

Read more...

Journal vs. Financial Times on HSH-UBS Subprime Dispute

From time to time, there are marked disparities in how events are reported in the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times. In the overwhelming majority of times, it’s the Journal’s reporting that’s deficient. Today’s sighting fits the classic pattern. The difference in headlines says it all. The Journal’s is: “German Bank Blames UBS for […]

Read more...

The Wall Street Journal Fulminates About Dinallo

Full disclosure: I am no fan of the Wall Street Journal’s editorials: in fact, I’ve commented on the liberties they often take with facts. But when they are on a pet peeve, they can become so overwrought that the level of agitation alone is amusing. And just because they are often wrong doesn’t mean they […]

Read more...

Will Paulson Come to Regret His Words?

We were one of the first to say that former Citigroup Charles Prince would come to regret his end-of-the-cycle-is-nigh comment initially reported in the Financial Times: Chuck Prince on Monday dismissed fears that the music was about to stop for the cheap credit-fuelled buy-out boom, saying Citigroup was “still dancing.” We are so bold as […]

Read more...

New Treasury Mortgage Borrower Salvage Program: More Smoke and Mirrors?

We didn’t think much of the New Hope Alliance, the program brokered by the Treasury Department to rescue subprime borrowers facing resets. The program’s criteria targeted those who were already paying fairly high initial interest rates with very little to no equity in their house at the time of closing. In other words, this group […]

Read more...

David Leonhardt: Was the "Great Moderation" An Illusion?

A very good article by David Leonhardt in today’s New York Times raises a question that would have been regarded with considerable skepticism as recently as, say, even August, when the perturbations in the debt markets seemed to be the largely the result of the subprime meltdown. That question is whether the Great Moderation, the […]

Read more...

Is the Journal Letting Merrill Off Easy?

Now it is hard to suggest that giant brokerage firm Merrill Lynch is being treated kindly by the press these days, given the deserved harsh scrutiny resulting from its staggering fourth quarter writeoffs. Nevetheless, we noted an oddity today. The Journal is running a story, “Springfield, Mass., Takes Aim at Merrill Over Subprime Losses,” that […]

Read more...

WSJ and FT on How Far Down is Down, Exactly? (Bond Insurer/Counterparty Risk Edition)

Despite a sharply negative opening, the Nikkei is up as of this hour, so there is some hope that the frazzled nerves of Thursday might calm in the US too. The Financial Times and the Wall Street Journal both address one of the major causes of the mini-panic: a new focus on counterparty risk. The […]

Read more...

Ben Stein and the Slapstick Approach to Economics

Today, Ben Stein, in his New York Times column, “Larry, Curly, Moe and the Economy,” uses the Three Stooges as metaphor for the Fed’s actions: the central bank, like the celluloid comics, keep hitting the wrong person on the head. According to Stein, the Fed is unduly preoccupied with inflation and it should instead engage […]

Read more...