Category Archives: The dismal science

Menzie Chinn on the Merits of Fiscal Stimulus Via Improvements to Automatic Stabilizers

While there is some debate about whether and how much fiscal stimulus is warranted to combat a likely recession (yours truly thinks that we are in a no-win situation, with side effects likely to be as bad as the disease), some sort of program seems inevitable, particularly since this is an election year. So then […]

Read more...

Ben Stein and the Slapstick Approach to Economics

Today, Ben Stein, in his New York Times column, “Larry, Curly, Moe and the Economy,” uses the Three Stooges as metaphor for the Fed’s actions: the central bank, like the celluloid comics, keep hitting the wrong person on the head. According to Stein, the Fed is unduly preoccupied with inflation and it should instead engage […]

Read more...

How Recessions May Indeed Improve Efficiency

An interesting post at VoxEU by Yoonsoo Lee at Cleveland’s Fed and Toshihiko Mukoyama, economics professor at the University of Virginia, looks into the question of whether the the Schumpeter theory of “creative destruction,” that recessions are good because they clear out the excesses of boom phases, holds water. Their research is far from exhaustive. […]

Read more...

"Business growth is not an end in itself"

A refreshing article in the Financial Times by Samuel Brittan reminds us that some celebrated economists envisioned continuing progress as leading not to ever-escalating levels of consumption, but to a society where improving productivity and technology would provide higher quality goods and more leisure. The French hew to that ideal (as Paul Krugman has pointed […]

Read more...

Edward Glaeser on Whether Open Markets Contribute to Growth

Harvard economics professor Edward Glaeser reviewed a new book, “Bad Samaritans” by Ha-Joon Chang in the New York Sun (hat tip Mark Thoma). Glaesar focuses on his objections to the book, but nevertheless concedes, Readers who believe in free trade will not find much in Mr. Chang that challenges that belief, but the book is […]

Read more...

Kenneth Arrow Makes the Climate Change Math Work

It falls to an uber economist like Nobel Prize winner Ken Arrow to look at climate change and make the economic case for prevention work without resorting to smoke and mirrors. This is a non-trivial accomplishment. For those who have not followed this aspect of the debate, one Sir Nicholas Stern prepared the so-called Stern […]

Read more...

Quelle Surprise! Experts Give Self-Serving Diagnoses

New York Times writer David Leonhardt, in “When Trust in an Expert Is Unwise,” cites a small scale study of car mechanics that suggests that so-called experts often aren’t very skilled, and also too often prescribe inappropriate and costly remedies to simple problems. Leonhardt suggests that the study’s findings can be generalized to fields like […]

Read more...

Nicholas Taleb Attacks the "Pseudo-Science" of Modern Finance

Nassim Nicholas Taleb, seasoned trader and risk manager, and author of the provocative and well regarded book Black Swans, today in the Financial Times takes on the high priesthood of modern finance. He argues that modern portfolio theory and many of its offspring, such as the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the capital asset pricing […]

Read more...

"Why Debunking Myths Can Backfire"

An excellent post, courtesy Mark Thoma at Economist’s View, from FactCheck.org, on why its efforts to correct the record are too often counterproductive. In essence, if ideas are falsely linked (say “Saddam Hussein” and “Al Queda”), further discussion preserves the false association. The entire post is very much worth reading; it’s a primer on how […]

Read more...

The Truth About Free Trade: Small Net Gain, Big Redistribution

Consider the ironies in the discussion of free trade. It’s widely depicted by economists to be a good thing, and anyone who opposed it is considered to be economically illiterate. Yet the system we have deviates considerably from the free trade ideal and is more accurately called managed trade. And in this system of managed […]

Read more...

Dani Rodrik Questions Conventional Wisdom on Labor Market Rigidities

Harvard’s Dani Rodrik in a recent post questioned the role of labor market rigidities (such as restrictions on firings and generous unemployment) in Europe’s higher unemployment. (As an aside, readers will know even that factoid is disputed. Barry Ritholtz has argued that if we calculated unemployment the same way Europeans did, the rates wouldn’t be […]

Read more...

Brad DeLong Argues That Central Banks Should Cut Interest Rates

It’s always dangerous for mere mortals to take issue with Serious Economists, but let’s start with Brad DeLong’s thesis (hat tip Mark Thoma): The fact that there is even a small liquidity crunch for banks implies larger liquidity crunches for less intensively regulated financial institutions, and even greater liquidity crunches for manufacturing and real-estate companies. […]

Read more...