Category Archives: The dismal science

Buiter Provokes Wrath at Jackson Hole, Says Fed Too Close to Wall Street

Go Willem Buiter! The London School of Economics prof and former Bank of England and European Bank for Reconstruction and Development official has been saying for some time that the Fed suffers from “cognitive regulatory capture” and has been far too responsive to the needs of Wall Street. It’s been puzzling to watch his detailed, […]

Read more...

Mark Hulbert: Equity Investors Don’t Understand Inflation

An article in today’s New York Times, “Illusions About Inflation,” by Mark Hulbert is based on the sort of research that gives economists a bad name. The piece references an a academic paper “Inflation Illusions and Stock Prices,” by John Campbell and Tuomo Vuolteenaho, that argues that investors analyze stocks incorrectly during inflationary times because […]

Read more...

Dani Rodrik: "Death of globalisation consensus"

Even though Greg Mankiw claims in the New York Times today that ” Economists are nearly unanimous in their support of an unfettered system of world trade,” another Harvard economics professor begs to differ. Dani Rodrik, writing for Project Syndicate, finds that some prominent former staunch advocates of liberalized trade regimes are having serious doubts […]

Read more...

Stiglitz: "The End of Neo-Liberalism?"

Nobel Prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz tells us that neo-liberalism, witch is a catch phrase for policies that favor domestic deregulation and dismantling trade barriers internationally, has failed. The problem that Stiglitz fails to acknowledge is that despite the questionable record of these practices, they still hold considerable sway in the media and in the […]

Read more...

Wolfgang Munchau: Maybe the Economists Are to Blame After All

Wolfgang Munchau, in his latest Financial Times comment, “Recession is not the worst possible outcome” takes up a theme near and dear to our and many readers hearts: that policies to avoid recessions do more damage in the long run than letting slumps run their course. Munchau is hard on economists, but not the purely […]

Read more...

Hoisted From Comments: Has Neo-Liberalism Failed to Deliver the Goods?

Reader Juan provided a well-argued and provocatively-worded critique of so-called market fundamentalism yesterday that I thought would provide grist for thought and discussion. The main argument in favor of less regulated commerce, both domestically, in the form of deregulation, and internationally, via more liberal trade regimes, is that it generates higher growth. Juan argues that […]

Read more...

Thomas Palley: "Beating the Oil Barons" (And the Misunderstood Role of Inventories)

Although we don’t always agree with his views, we are fans of Thomas Palley posts because he is willing to question economic orthodoxy. We were particularly taken with his piece, “Demythologizing Central Bankers and the Great Moderation.” In his latest offering, Palley disputes the idea that the recent runup in oil prices is entirely the […]

Read more...

Stephen Cecchetti Touts Financial Innovation

A comment in the Financial Times, “Our need to sustain the ‘great moderation’,”by Stephen Cecchetti, professor of global finance at Brandeis, set my teeth on edge. I suspect many readers will react the same way. Let’s start: The US housing market has collapsed, placing severe strains on the financial system and, as a direct consequence, […]

Read more...