Hospital bridles at horse in lift BBC
Taming the Beast Paul Krugman
Campaign silence over Wall Street Woes Clive Crook, Financial Times
The Long Dark Night of the Soul of the Monetary Economist: A Platonic Dialogue Brad De Long. He pointed to this archival post…
Lying for Jesus? Richard Dawkins. This is in lieu of commentary on Ben Stein’s New York Times piece over the weekend.
Signs Of The Time, Part 8 Boom2Bust
Hedge funds cut commodities exposure Financial Times. So now it’s official: speculation did have something to do with the run-up.
Catastrophic Bank Failures Do Not Necessarily Promote Economic Activity PGL, Angry Bear
“A Coordinated Effort to Destroy Effective Regulation” Mark Thoma
Antidote du jour. Some readers were so kind as to send pix or point me to good sources:









“So now it’s official: speculation did have something to do with the run-up.”
eventually we’ll have a better idea as to whether speculation drove commodity prices too high or whether the emergency need to raise cash drove them too low.
long-term charts of crude oil and natural gas don’t suggest that speculative bubbles have now burst. crude hasn’t come down much, especially longer-dated contracts, and nat gas doesn’t appear to be in a bubble in the first place.
gold and silver don’t support the idea. gold’s pullback hasn’t been that big so far, and silver has a tendency to plunge from time to time despite its long-term uptrend.
big agricultural markets are more supportive of your view, though i’ve heard (from donald coxe on thursday, for example) that recent rainfall in north america and australia has knocked down grain and bean prices.
some smaller commodity markets look like they ran up since late january on speculation, it’s true.
but i believe we are still in a secular bull market for commodities and that we’ll probably see new highs in many commodity markets before long.