Eurozone Delays and Half Measures

Yves here. A small clarification this post. Mody correctly takes a dim view of Outright Monetary Transactions, calling it a mere “promise” by Draghi of actions to support the Eurozone that never came to pass.

The OMT, as it was called, was even more cynical that that. Draghi presented it as if it were a new authority, when it was a mere compilation and rebranding of existing powers.

By Ashoka Mody, Professor of Economics at Princeton. Originally published at Handelsblatt; cross posted from Bruegel

The euro area member states gave up monetary policies for countering economic adversities, but the founding fathers lacked political will to compensate with pooled resources for helping each other. This incompleteness is surely made worse by wrong-headed policies, delays, and half measures. That said, the distinction is overstated: the incomplete monetary union and repeated policy errors likely come from the same source.

Recent research shows the ECB fell behind the curve at critical junctures of the crisis. As the U.S. Federal Reserve slashed interest rates to fight the Great Recession, the ECB at first raised the policy interest rate in July 2008. That hike came just as euro area industrial production began a prolonged economic contraction. In April and July 2011, the ECB raised interest rates when the American rate was near zero and the Fed was adding stimulus through quantitative easing.

Aside from the Outright Monetary Transactions promise in July 2012 to bail out countries in distress, the ECB has been unable to inspire confidence. Since late-2013, it has reacted to rather than led the fight against deflationary tendencies. ECB President Draghi has made an art of coyly promising more measures “if needed,” or if low inflation is “prolonged,” or “too prolonged.” While such ambiguity often serves central bankers well, markets have regarded actions taken as “too little, too late.” Earlier this month, the ECB announced new measures hoping to spur economic activity and inflation. But the criticism was swift. Stock markets “tumbled, said the Wall Street Journal, “because the European Central Bank served up a package of stimulus measures that fell well short of many investors’ expectations.” Abnormally low inflation has persisted, and the ECB’s credibility continues to be damaged.

Fiscal austerity set the euro area back in 2011-13. But the orthodoxy still denies that cuts in governments spending hurt growth, more so the weaker the economy.  Subjected to five years of draconian austerity, Greek voters have pleaded over the past year that this calamity be stopped. But the creditors require further consolidation of 3½ percent of GDP. And although this would cause Greek GDP to contract by about 7 percent, the creditors project a miraculous resumption of growth.

The costs of long delays in dealing with distress in small and medium-sized banks are becoming apparent. Italian authorities just had a taste of the minefields that lie hidden in their banking system. These will only increase if painful decisions are avoided.

As 2015 ends, euro area output is finally back to its 2007 level. Inflation, has been stuck well below the ECB’s 2% goal. Recent signs of growth in household consumption are welcome. But this is a bounce back after a long spell of deep austerity, and is unlikely to persist. Half a century of evidence tells us that European economic growth is tightly tied to world trade growth. And unless world trade growth picks up from its doldrums—and the pickup will be weak as long as China struggles to find a new equilibrium—low growth and inflation will likely continue in the euro area.

So, is the problem the incomplete monetary union or policy errors? The answer is that the same divergent national interests and ideologies that caused the monetary union’s incompleteness now cause the delays and inability to learn. The structure is held together by enforcing groupthink, which ignores evidence and discourages criticism. Groupthink led to the euro’s construction despite overwhelming evidence of its flaws. Policy errors feed on that original hubris because any risk of paying another sovereign’s bills is intolerable. Now France, Italy, and Spain plan to defy austerity rules and impart fiscal stimulus in a self-interested rebellion from the groupthink. This would be good for the rebels and the euro’s best hope.

Print Friendly
Tweet about this on Twitter0Digg thisShare on Reddit0Share on StumbleUpon0Share on Facebook0Share on LinkedIn0Share on Google+0Buffer this pageEmail this to someone

7 comments

  1. craazyman

    Well let’s abolish Groupthink then. OK?

    Can’t we all agree on at least that!

    hahahah sorry.

    This is the anniversary year of the Beach Boy’s PET SOUNDS, the album that revolutionized rock & roll. Can you believe it was 50 years ago. That’s like the Old Europe, before the euro even!

    Well we sailed on the ECB
    The Bundestag and me
    Around Euro town we did roam
    Printing all night
    Got in to a fight
    Well I feel so broke up
    I wanna go home

    So hoist up the Centime sail
    See how the Drachma sets
    Call for the Lira once more
    and let me go home, let me go home
    I wanna go home, why won’t they let me go home, oh yeah
    Well I feel so broke up
    I wanna go home

      1. craazyman

        LOL, pretty good!

        It’s amazing what a work of genius PET SOUNDS was. It’s just incredible how good it is. 50 years later it’s still incredible.

        Who will remember DSGE 50 years from now? it won’t even be on Youtube!

          1. craazyman

            Don’t Worry Baby

            well we’ve been printing lots of money now
            for oh i don’t know how long
            I don’t know why
            but I keep thinking
            something’s bound to go wrong
            But that’s a pack of lies,
            We need to monetize, so they say
            Don’t worry baby, don’t worry baby
            Everything will turn out all right
            Dont worry baby Don’t worry baby

            I guess we could’ve kept on spending
            when we got that Porsche for a new car
            I don’t know why but they say that
            we’ve pushed the Bundesbank too far
            It makes me come alive, when I hit overdrive
            and I say Dont worry baby
            Dont worrry baby
            Everything will turn out all right
            Don’t worry baby

  2. TheCatSaid

    When the EEC/EZ was set up these aspects were a undisclosed features for those in the golden circle making decisions. They were not not “bugs” or “bad policies” or a combination of unforseen “oops” moments.

    Same goes for the non-democratic, secretive, unaccountable nature of decision-making in the EU/EZ.

    It’s uncomfortable and unpleasant, and makes it more difficult to address. Reform of institutions that are controlled by those who benefit from the status quo is not going to happen by using the existing undemodratic mechanisms currently in place.

    I don’t have any answers, but at least people who write intelligent-sounding posts should stop pretending.

  3. Gudo

    The Eurozone has always been heterogeneous. There is nothing matching their interests with trade competency. Hence the talk, and set up of a common currency now called the Euro was just but historical. A context and memory of abuse and conquest. An ambition built in guilt in yester year colonial Europe. Nothing to do with trade. Nothing to do with currency. That is how the Euro as a currency will collapse. There is no homogeneity in trade terms. It is just a memory in historical terms. “I was once Big therefore am Big. There is China for you……………………………….

Comments are closed.