The Fight to Save a Prairie Chicken NYT
U.S. CLOs Have Material Exposure to Commodities, Moody’s Says Bloomberg
Rail Executives to Address Investor Concerns WSJ
Manufacturing, the Dollar and Implications for Monetary Policy Econbrowser
Where are U.S. data on the gig economy? Washington Center for Equitable Growth
Mortgage debt — the new retirement time bomb WaPo
Fannie Mae Revamps Mortgage Program NYT
Late Friday surprise: Supreme Court says charter schools initiative is unconstitutional Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Rousseff to spare central bank in cabinet reform: sources Reuters
G20 eyes faster economic reforms as cheap credit not enough for growth Reuters
G20 supports China’s efforts to stabilise economy FT
China Market Volatility Nearing End, Says Central Bank Official Bloomberg
Sizeable capital outflow from China adds another layer of worry Market Watch
Battle for the bottle – the fight to feed China’s babies Sidney Morning Herald
Driven to Kill Slate. Eesh, I hope this is sensationalism.
Russia ‘is building military base in Syria’ Telegraph. Says “American intelligence.”
RUSSIAN EXPEDITIONARY FORCE IN SYRIA – ANOTHER POSSIBLE EXPLANATION Sic Semper Tyrannis
Under Fight-Against-ISIS Disguise “West” Prepares To Openly Attack Syria Moon of Alabama
The Iran Deal and the End of the Israel Lobby Jonathon Chait, New York Magazine (Re Silc)
The Islamic State Diary: A Chronicle of Life in Libyan Purgatory Der Spiegel. Yeah, that splendid little war worked out great, didn’t it?
Labour leadership election: MPs prepare to resist Corbynistas Guardian
The poisoned chalice Open Democracy
Alexis Tsipras faces shock election defeat as voters on course to punish Syriza at the ballot box Telegraph
New obstacle for refugees: the Greek coast guard McClatchy
German volunteers launch online phrasebook for refugees Guardian
East west divide over crisis as exhausted refugees arrive in Austria FT
Here is the exact ballot question Britain will answer when it votes on whether to leave the EU Business Insider
The state of ‘dark money’ in U.S. politics Daily Dot
Poll: Trump beats Hillary head-to-head The Hill. Trump gets 25% of the Black vote, and 31% of the Latino vote? I dunno about this…
Bernie Sanders picks up megaphone, walks union picket in Cedar Rapids Des Moines Register. I hope his shoes were comfortable….
Sanders: Clinton ‘getting nervous’ as race tightens The Hill
Margaret Atwood: The geezer vote National Post
If You Ever Wondered Whose Side The Federal Reserve Is On… Tim Duy’s Fed Watch. “Real median weekly earnings have grown 8.6% since 1985. Nonfarm output per hour is up 79% over that time. Yet the instant that there is even a glimmer of hope that labor might get an upper hand, the Federal Reserve looks to hold the line on wage growth.”
America’s silent-but-deadly billionaires: How our tight-lipped overlords are waging stealth campaigns against the middle class Salon
Three Rich Treasury Secretaries Laugh It Up Over Income Inequality HuffPo
Eat the Rich and Pay the Poor Foreign Policy
Review: Freelance life as lethal as Red Bull mixed with coffee Prachatai
Scientists may have just stumbled upon a mathematical secret to how nature works WaPo. “[T]he way predator and prey numbers relate to each other is the same for different species all over the world.”
In Hyperspace Fredric Jameson, LRB
Environmental Ethics in a Post-Natural World Utne Reader
Copenhagen New Carsharing Integrated With Public Transport Cities of the Future (Furzy Mouse). Listening, Travis?
At West Point, Annual Pillow Fight Becomes Weaponized NYT
Antidote du jour (RG):
RG: “Turkey Vulture in my back yard.”
Re: The Sydney Morning Herald report on restrictions on baby formula.
These restrictions are common all over Europe, in the name of preventing the Chinese from buying up all the milk formula and sending it to China. I’ve a personal interest in this as I regularly send boxes of formula from Ireland to China for a friend with an infant who, like nearly all Chinese, don’t trust domestic supplies.
The thing is, there is not an iota of evidence that this is effecting domestic supplies in any country. There is in fact a glut of dairy products on the world market at the moment. The main reason for ‘restrictions’ is that it promotes panic buying by domestic mothers, who stockpile and end up with excessive purchases. It also gives them an excuse not to ever discount formula, or even provide the ‘points’ that many retailers give for other purchases. It is, in short, a marketing scam.
Chinese mothers are of course getting ripped off – a can of formula costs in Europe around 13-15 euro. The same can can cost from 35 to 50 euro in China. So it is well worth me sending a dozen cans at a cost of around 60 euro postage to China to my friend, she not just saving lots of money, she has milk which is ‘safe’ in the way consumers never feel Chinese products (even from foreign brands) are safe. It also explains why counterfeiters have focused on baby formula as a way to make lots of money. Its not known as ‘white gold’ in China for no reason.
Another issue of course is that one reason why so much formula is needed in China, is not just the sheer number of babies, it is that there are active attempts by the usual suspects to undermine breast feeding.
Final point – my friend sent me last week a photo of a brand in a chinese supermarket from a well known US pharmaceutical company lab led as ‘guaranteed sourced from Ireland’. This is on foot of an Irish government campaign to promote Irish food goods in China as particularly green and healthy. The irony is that this particular pharmaceutical company is notorious in Ireland for being responsible for a polluting company which back in the 1980’s contaminated dairy grazing lands in the vicinity, driving local farmers out of business.
Well, Euro and US companies are well-known for exporting lower-quality versions of their products to the “new” Europeans in the East, at inflated prices. Separate but equal in United Europe, y’all! A few years ago there was a huge scandal in BG due to the importation of 50 tonnes of 20 year old Irish beef…
“…even foreign brands” (of made locally over there in China, I presume).
What about foreign pork from Chinese owned pig farms (in America)? Do they trust that?
And one day, foreign milk products (from Chinese owned dairies outside China) – will they trust that?
Essentially, Chinese people do not trust any food product in which any part of the supply chain involves a Chinese company – it really is that simple. A Chinese friend of mine did a survey on this as part of her thesis and she found that the overwhelming majority of respondents simply assumed that if there was a Chinese company involved, there was the possibility of contamination. And not even in China – I once showed a Chinese friend of mine who was visiting New York a NYT review of a hot new place in Chinatown in Manhattan, and it raved about the lobster dishes. ‘They probably found them in the sewers’ was her simply reply. I’ve also had Chinese friends visit me here in Ireland, and before they leave they weigh their bag, work out how many kgs they have left over, and then go to my local Aldi and fill up with cheese, dried meats, etc. Its not a cost thing, its simply that they feel the food is ‘cleaner’. And this despite the fact of it being after the horse-meat in everything scandal here.
Most put up with this in day to day life, but one thing they will not put up with is the risk of milk with children. My friends dissertation found families who were paying perhaps 30-40% of their income on milk formula for their child.
Given those frickin’-insane formula prices, it’s high time to bring back and destigmatize the old-fashioned practice of wet-nursing, from the sound of it.
Re: Marketwatch article on outflows from China.
I’ve always felt that the number 1 indicator of a possible crash in China would be a sudden outflow of money – through official and unofficial channels. I don’t think there is any country in history where the participants in a boom have been so pessimistic about how the boom would work out. All evidence suggests that every Chinese person with any net worth has an ‘exit’ plan, usually involving a business or property in Australia, the US or Europe. This is one of the major flaws of any attempt to allow the Yuan to devalue – most investors know this is probably a one way bet, so will take the opportunity to cash in while they can and put money into foreign property (the favoured fall back). This is likely to far outweigh any inflow from abroad seeking cheap investments.
I don’t think the evidence as yet is of a panicky outflow, but it is certainly evidence that some wealthy people have their fingers over the trigger. If things get worse over the next six months, then it could become very serious.
Then over the medium to longer term the Holy Grail is to re-balance the economy towards more consumption, but you still have massive income inequality and, worse yet, wealth concentration that is leaving the country.
Japan was in much better shape pre-crash – they had a 1st world economy and incomes, much less wealth inequality than the US even back in 1990, and the rich weren’t fleeing the country.
This, to me, seems to make a “soft landing” and re-balancing in China look rather difficult.
That move towards more consumption (more domestic focus) can be broadened so that nations should be encouraged to take care of themselves, meaning not polluting themselves in order to make fast money so that eventually when the place is not livable, the wealthy can just escape.
Chinese money buying expensive mansions here doesn’t do much good for the little people.
Yes, surprisingly, Michael Pettis from these parts seems to be something of an optimist that China can re-balance sufficiently to prevent a really nasty landing, although I think he favours the probability of a long period of low growth as being more likely than either a crash or a soft landing.
I can’t pretend to know more than Pettis, but it seems to me that if the transition were to occur (and there is no question but that the CCP is fully aware of the dangers of not transitioning, they are keen students of the Japanese crash), it would already have done so. I suspect that the internal opposition to making the necessary hard decisions is simply too strong. For the Chinese government to engineer a major economic shift they have to take the regional governments along (many of these are virtually self governing countries), and all the indications are that they can’t do this. Plus there is a whole new generation of oligarchs to deal with. And to top it all, many individual government members from top to bottom are so personally invested in the current model (usually via their wives and family), that it may be beyond the leadership. I’ve little doubt that the current crackdown on corruption and dissent is an attempt to centralise power sufficiently to make rapid economic changes – but whether Xi will succeed or not, I don’t really know.
Re: Tim Duy
Looking at total real output and compensation one can see from the late 1940’s to 1980 compensation kept pace with or exceeded growth in output (the latter meaning labor increased its share of national income). In 1980 the trend reversed with output growing faster than compensation. Notice the trend inversion that occurred during the 2007-2008 GFC:
From the Prachatai review linked above:
This is the nightmarish reality that neoliberals would like to see for all but a handful of billionaire “job-creators.” Whether it be driving for Uber, teaching at a charter school, makes no difference– the neoliberals would like us to return to the days where half-starved workers wait outside the factory gates before dawn. Standing in a crowd, desperately hoping that they look fit and healthy enough to be picked to labor for meager wages, that might allow them another day or two of wretched existence.
And falling for the doctor because she’s the only woman you see … Not that she’s not cute and riding off into the sunset wouldn’t be sweet, but how often do those relationships that start off as financial relationships ever become real relationships of any kind? Easy to relate to as many of us are suffering much less extreme versions of the same overwork disease that is killing him.
The Thai system apparently also ties healthcare heavily to employment. Geez, it may even be worse than here after the ACA!
Dead link for the Cities of the Future’ article on Copenhagen. Link here:
Its interesting that the Copenhagen project is supported by Arriva, one of the biggest European contractors for public transport. They obviously see this type of integration as a benefit to them, not a competitor. We hear a lot about new tech companies creating new paradigms, etc., but I’ve always suspected that ultimately the likes of Uber will lose out to existing big companies, who know how things work ‘on the ground’ and have the capital and know-how to back it up. BMW have made no secret of seeing the future of cars as involving some form of car-sharing along the lines of the Copenhagen project. An alliance of more far-sighted car companies and established public transport operators could potentially wipe the floor with the new tech companies, including google.
When I think of Arriva, what comes to mind from a few years ago, is experience of dirty, poorly run trains in London, as well as plain irresponsible scheduling of trains in Wales.
Also it is an extremely poor idea of give a single company a franchise – monopoly – covering multiple modes of transport. Basically, then they can run crappy expensive trains AND at the same time they have locked out competition in terms of people taking car sharing.
Incredibly bad idea. I would go as far as to say “malpractice” from a govt point of view, as it is NOT in the best interest of the taxpayer/commuter to do this.
It is also a bad idea for national security!
National security now means, “profits”, so you may want to rephrase that.
Re: The articles on Syria.
It does seem that some sort of consensus is building up among the usual suspects that the way forward in Syria is to back a mixture of Kurds and ‘moderates’, formally against Isis but equally against Assad. Although how Turkey’s attacks on the Kurds will add to that mix is anyones guess. For all sorts of reasons that should be obvious to anyone paying attention, that will only make things even worse.
it does seem that Putins strategy is to be a continuous bit of grit in the machine to any attempt by the West to depose Assad. Iran will probably add to that mix. I never thought I’d be in favour of anything Putin does, but if he does warn the West off further meddling in Syria, he will probably be doing everyone a favour.
Having said that, its hard to see what any sort of endgame in Syria will look like. Assad will never again control the whole country, but it seems only Isis is capable of ‘unifying’ the country, which will of course mean a slaughter greater than anyone has seen up to now. Some sort of partition seems inevitable. The best we can hope for is that its a reasonably sensible one.
Putin advised against the Iraq invasion, Libya, urged for softer power in Libya, and has warned random bombing campaigns would lead to a refugee crisis. I know Vlad isn’t an American, but perhaps, he is a villain for reasons other than Western propaganda outlets claim. Oh, he has allowed safe haven for Snowden when he knows there is no system of justice in the U.S.
Let’s not mention greater Asian cooperation. He managed to get the Pakistanis and Indians to agree on an anti-terror strategy.
Believe it or not, there is a much larger world than a “performance art group” being arrested for breaking and entering and destruction of property at a museum then filming said crimes. “Pussy Riot” isn’t much of a rally cry these days. I guess people saw the video of their “free speech.”
Putin is still ultimately a reaction to Yeltsin, the guy who created all the oligarchs. That oligarchs who was supposedly poisoned according to MI6, truly an upstanding organization, made his money defrauding ordinary Russians. The world didn’t lose a voice for anything worthwhile.
What oligarch was that? What is the name of the oligarch who was supposedly poisoned according to MI6?
Alexander Litvinenko? Not a true oligarch, but a disaffected KGB man. He was the one poisoned with Polonium 210 in England and died of acute radiation poisoning.
He was a lackey of Boris Berezovsky. Memory fades over time.
So, he actually was poisoned? And he really wasn’t an oligarch at all? Didn’t even have a single million dollars?
The end game in Syria is going to have to be quite upsetting for the U S of A and its neo-lib / neo-con elites: The U.S. is implicated in the destruction of Iraq as a viable state, with estimates of 4 to 6 million internally displaced and 2 million refugees. The numbers for Syria are roughly the same. We don’t even keep track of Afghanistan. Yemen, who cares? Libya? Let the Italians handle that. End game? I don’t see one.
Until the U.S. elites are willing to give up their corrupt relations with Our Friends the Israelis (the only democracy in the Middle East (™) and with the Saudis, religious fanatics extraordinaire, we will see a continuing humanitarian crisis. So don’t hold your breath.
I don’t like to say “I told you (our foreign policy gurus, not you) so*”, but this mess was predicted back in 02. The under 16 population in Iraq was huge. There were two post war baby booms.
*It happens so often it loses any kind of utility.
Not as upsetting as you might think. The Euro lemming elites, OTOH, yes they are upset as Europe gets swamped by a human refugee waves due to the wars and “revolutions” they so willingly aided and abetted. The Mediterranean ain’t as big a barrier as the Atlantic, plus there is the curious fact of the refugees suddenly deciding to leave Turkey… So why would any of this upset US elites? It keeps the Euro lemmings busy, and makes them even more dependent on the “NATO” security umbrella. That’s a great outcome for neocon/neolib elites. They can use the situation as a lever to overcome opposition to the TTIP as well…
RE: America’s silent-but-deadly billionaires: How our tight-lipped overlords are waging stealth campaigns against the middle class Salon
Unmentioned is the establishment and funding of “think tanks” purporting to “study” issues, produce “research” and arrive at “conclusions” that conveniently coincide with billionaires’ “interests” while simultaneously becoming “facts.”
Then, of course, there is ownership of the “media,” where those “facts” become conventional wisdom. Here issues are framed or ignored, think tank hacks and political operatives become “experts” and disclosure of conflicts of interest are optional. Not to mention celebrity “journalists” with a fat paycheck, signed by those very same billionaires, to protect.
When money is “speech,” the term “tight-lipped” takes on a whole new meaning.
Follow the money. When I see an opinion piece in, let’s say the NYT, by a writer I am not familiar with, often I will wiki or google them to get an idea of who signs their paychecks—before I read the article.
The dissemination of propaganda is a multi-layered process—the major media are the devices for delivery.
It’s not that difficult to follow the money and peek behind the curtain – and that doesn’t bode well for our future does it? People cannot be bothered. Has it ever been easier to strip the bullshit off of the propaganda? Again, people cannot be bothered.
2016 / Sanders /Clinton
At a Union Labor Day weekend event in Wichita, Kansas, Sanders supporters had a booth—no presence for Clinton.
—About a dozen Bernie Sanders campaign volunteers manned a booth at the event, but there was no visible presence of Hillary Clinton supporters, even though Clinton has already secured the endorsement of the American Federation of Teachers, one of the largest and most influential unions in the country. The AFL-CIO, of which the local machinists are members, has not yet endorsed a candidate.
The Sanders volunteers said they were trying to get the Democratic candidate for president to come to Wichita.—
RE: Mortgage debt — the new retirement time bomb WaPo
“Moraif says one of the dangers of retiring with mortgage debt is that the economy and markets may turn bad.”
Ken Moraif is a “SENIOR adviser at Money Matters in North Dallas, Tex.” I’ll bet this firm is very successful. This Moraif guy is BRILLIANT.
Several years ago, I was speaking with the state legislator who sponsored Washington’s “Foreclosure Fairness Act”* and told her, “Have you seen the ‘deals’ that the banks are supplying as ‘modifications’? They are including a huge balloon payment on the backside. What that means is if that family should ever: 1) need to move for a job; 2) face divorce; 3) lose a job, they would be facing foreclosure all over again.” The legislator nodded that, yes, she knew and understood the ramifications.
The legislators/elected officials have all received the same message:
screw the lowly homeowners, fix the laws to support the banks.
*definition of irony should include that if “Foreclosure” and “Fairness” is ever be used in the same description of a legislative act, then it is ironic.
Let’s not forget that TARP was one gigantic “bait-and-switch”, imagine if we had gotten $53,000 per household instead to shore up underwater mortgages. Banks would have been saved…but the 1% would not have been able to stoke huge asset inflation in the stock market casino.
‘Scientists may have just stumbled upon a mathematical secret to how nature works’
Actually, it’s basically Kleiber’s Law, which dates from 1932.
The value of the study is that it looks at a very high number of communities. In this way it’s more akin to the economic studies which actually look at effects rather than the McEconomics of flipping equations.
Steve H. Thank You!
“If You’ve Ever Wondered If Tim Duy Will Ever Get It”
No, Tim…we don’t get raises because the Fed cuts interest rates.
No one wonders whose side the Fed is on. That’s obvious to the blind, deaf, lame and halt.
Duy needs to lose the Fedolatry. As you correctly point out, they do not control the world economy. If we want to give workers a raise, there’s a political process for that.
I don’t think there is any hope for Tim Duy. He’s been doing essentially the same “cutting the Fed rate [to banks] solves any and all problems” post for at least 15 years, which was when I first discovered there is a Tim Duy.
Problem is, the Fed believes that bullshit, too. And it’s convenient for our political class to say they believe it — passing the buck.
If you’ve lost Tim Duy….
Regarding the refugee situation in Europe.
The majority of the French are against accepting more refugees, irrespective of the disastrous situation. The most negative are the the people voting to the right. Young people are more negative than people over 65! (who are old enough and not stupid enough to have forgotten about WWII). The “traditional” French right consists of catholics who generally (not all) are xenophobic, islamophobic (and homophobic). Sarkozy’s party is not far from the extreme right on this issue, meaning that the French, as opposed to the right in Germany and in Sweden, are oblivious to people drowning in the Mediterranean.
Sarkozy was actually on vacation in Corsica in August (renting a house at 8000 euro per week), sold the photoshopped pictures of him and his wife to Paris Match which of course made the cover and was all the talk in Paris that week. Meanwhile, hundreds were drowning and thousands were suffering a few 100 kilometers from where Sarko was sunbathing. Such is the solidarity of the French right.
Funnily enough, the Pope earlier today told all catholic parishes in Europe to accept at least one family of refugees. Let’s see how the French scum on the right respond to that.
The relationship between France and the Papacy was never close. They kept the Pope under house arrest for a time.
In the early days of the Libya fiasco, the French were worried the death of Gaddafi (he would be 75 now) would exacerbate a refugee crisis as tribal warfare took over which is probably true. They took the opportunity to back an outfit (the Libyan National Council was the elite and upper middoe class of Benghazi; they werent long term guerrillas) that seemed like it could run things. The problem is neo liberals descended on the country, spending cash that once went to social programs on malls and propping up Libya’s currency and we, the U.S. blew up a good deal of infrastructure, handed out weapons, and flooded the place with lunatics instead of enforcing merely a no-fly zone.* France is already a major immigrant destination, so there position isn’t entirely surprising.
*I didn’t agree with this this, but at least, I can see reasonable outcomes from this strategy versus Hillary pretending she was Caesar from the comfort of Versailles on the Potomac.
Total, EDF and other French multinationals were on the official French jets that flew to and from Libya to “help peace”. Litterally. Was part of the deal. Ironically, it is the Hillary emails that show this.
Still not possible to prove that Gadaffi sponsored Sarkozy’s 2007 Presidential campaign but Sarko’s eagerness to have the Libyan killed as soon as possible – and not brought before justice – speaks volumes.
Most French “traditionalists” on the right define themselves as catholic. They marched by the millions against gay marriage and now refuse more refugees (the majority). In this context, does not really matter whether they are close to the Vatican or not.
My brother-in-law is French and lived/operated in the top echelons of Tripoli for the five years before Gaddafi was deposed. He says it was common knowledge that Gaddafi fronted multiple billions to UniCredito during 2008 and they didn’t feel like paying it back
Just read the article about drivers in China deliberately killing pedestrians (by hitting them again and again after initially hitting them accidentally). Absolutely horrific and appalling behavior. I understand the incentive, that (purportedly accidentally) killing a pedestrian carries much less liability than just injuring them. But killing someone in order to save money — could something be more textbook evil? And many of the examples are of children. Seems the U.S. isn’t the only country enabling sociopaths.
Three years old…
Quote: About 20,000 hit-and-run crashes, from fender benders to multiple fatalities, are recorded by the Los Angeles Police Department each year.
I think you miss the point.
If a driver hits a person once, that might be an accident. But if the driver backs up and hits the person again, that’s intentional homicide. I’m pretty sure that would be considered first degree murder in the United States, and I suspect that China has something similar in their laws. If surveillance videos show a car repeatedly driving back and forth over a victim, and the defendant is only found guilty of accidental homicide, we can be certain that the judge was bribed.
Goldman tested the limits of banking morality with huge fees from 1MDB
A thankless job, but someone had to do it.
Three Rich Treasury Secretaries Laugh It Up Over Income Inequality HuffPo & Eat the Rich and Pay the Poor Foreign Policy
Dead Kennedys – Kill the poor
Or Stars and Stripes of Corruption
It appears Fannie Mae’s new “mortgage program” understands that the price of housing can only be afforded by the low wage earner if they include multi-generations of family members who may be wanting to live in the same house.
That’s how the Japanese kept their housing prices up. A 100 year mortgage and 3 generations under one roof.
What’s the definition of insanity again?
Living with in-laws seem a close second?
It’s generally been known to be a major cause.
Re: Clinton v. Trump.
The man says some things bluntly that are bluntly true, such as that Jeb! and Hillary are owned by the lobbyists and billionaires. Surprise! Despite the best efforts of the Depublicrats, people have not completely lost their ability to recognize the truth.
“Until I ran for President, I told Jeb and Hillary to jump, and they went how high. Hell, Bill gave me advice on running against his wife just because I’m loaded. Yo, those cnbc shows need to bring in some younger models.” -the line from Trump that wins him the nomination
Interesting notion. The POTUS electoral filtering process have become so utterly toxic, rendered of any bluntness, that Trump may be just be in a place and time where many people are wanting to embrace someone who seems to speak extemporaneously whether or not it makes any sense or is accurate is quite irrelevant.
Consider the last 15-16 years, two election cycles won by a guy who was a variation on an intellectually exceptional version of Foster Brooks w/a combination of ADD and OCD driven by addiction. Bush piloted the country into terrain leaving an economic shambles bereft of any foreign policy dignity.
So he’s followed by a guy (also elected twice!) who is the Neoliberal incarnation of Elmer Gantry who could pitch BS bromides without saying annnd….ahhhhh, ummm… that his peeps thought smelled like daisies, all while serving a duplicitous agenda!
In my heart I feel the R apparatchik threw the first BHO election thinking he would not be able to kick the economic can down the road and he would take the hit on cleanup duty. Low and behold he embraced the Plutocrat’s status quo and, not too amazingly when considered in that context, was re-elected running against a knucklehead. That second election was a Plutocrat win-win either way.
So now there is a portion of the electorate thinking , well jeeze it seems like this guy Trump is pushing back on the status quo, some of it seeeeems to make sense and the real crazy talk, we’ll chalk up to his having a passionate Type A bombastic politically incorrect nature, kinda like a fun version of Gordon Gecko!
He seeeeems to be a successful guy…He doesn’t seeeeem to need to enrich himself and curry favor to entrenched Plutocrats. What the heck, I want to herd with a winner, maybe some will rub off on me !
I would add one more item. I’ve been inside Trump tower. There were Trump casinos. Trump had a successful reality show. Trump seems more like a very successful small business man than a glorified paper pusher. 401ks and casinos might be the thing today, but at least the latter can fun. I’ve never gambled more than $5 except for my fantasy league, and I enjoy returning my winnings after explaining it’s not really a fair competition.
Back to Trump, he builds stuff you and I can see. Mittens was a hedge fund guy and thus fake. Dubya had a baseball team and was an oil man. His daddy was just a bureaucrat living off family wealth and economic chicanery. I can’t buy the Carlyle Group pet rock or walk into a franchise of Neil Bush. I really think this males a huge difference. Perot’s old companies became major parts of HP and Dell. I can judge his worth. I can pop in my vhs tapes of the Apprentice, the one where the chick had the huge knockers*, and judge for myself.
*I have no idea what happens on The Apprentice. I’ve never seen it. If this President thing doesn’t work out, Trump could do a show, “The Page.” Who can fetch more staples before the printer is done next time on NBC?
More like he takes money from pension funds and builds buildings with their money and puts his name on it. Charlatan and a troll.
W borrowed money from his fathers friend to purchase a minority share in the Texas Rangers. He was never really a baseball guy.
Huh? Trump inherited a real estate business and was basically by virtue of that able to ride the stunning reversal of NYC real estate from the fiscal crisis of the later 1970s to today.
He now basically operators as a licensor of his name. Other people run those businesses. Trump just takes royalities.
His financial statements show he has hardly any liquid assets. And not as much in real estate as you’d expect. And the real estate is so levered, who knows how much net worth is there.
Trump’s brand is his asset as you say, its all about leverage and appearances. Live off the cashflow, lease everything, it’s the American way.
As far as W goes, He succeeded in bankrupting an oil exploration company in Texas, then his dad’s friends installed him in the Texas Rangers after engineering an eminent domain stadium deal. It would be inaccurate to imply he barrowed money to do anything premeditated and clever. He was anointed with financial independence like so many political creatures (see Rahm Emmanuel file)
Hay Richard Branson should get royalties from Trump for copying his biz model.
I’m not inclined to defend dubya at all. But… having worked in the mineral exploration biz, more go bankrupt than not.
People buy gas, so being an oil man resonates with a kind of voter. It seems like a man’s man profession.
The Ranger ownership is important. He traded away Sosa who probably wasn’t juicing at the time, but there is a radical difference between pre- and post-Camden Yards stadiums*. Anyone who went to a Rangers game in the new stadium had a good time. There were billboards of the displaced outside. Seeing Trump’s rise, I now think this mattered to people. It wasn’t noticed because it wasn’t national trend, but the Pittsburgh metro area was likely inundated with references to how the new ball field was modeled on parks such as the Texas Rangers stadium in the year 2000.
*Fenway is a dump. Inevitably, they will be the Foxborough Red Sox. My family had a Fenway cat when I was a lad.
It’s a perspective. You can hold and inspect the Trump brand in a fashion. The average person can’t hold the Mittens brand since George Romney. Trump’s supporters feel they can judge the value of Trump’s business acumen or worth.
His business reality isn’t as relevant as the access to the brand. I have no idea how those Trump affiliated buildings went up, but they are there. This makes the difference.
I agree with you 100%, but it’s Trump’s name on buildings, not the operators. In this case, facts sound like sour grapes because why isn’t your name on the building if you are so smart. If I was Konservative, I see a “known” brand in Trump being attacked by “Libruls”, “Dimmiecrats”, and a wing of the GOP I never trusted (the Southern Strategy is still relevant) Trump became public enemy number one when he challenged the GOP establishment.
This is an element of Trump’s appeal. His “worth”can be judged without a middleman. Romney’s time at hedge funds needed explanations.
Years ago, Nader offered an explanation of Jesse Ventura’s win in Minnesota: he “didn’t sound like a politician.”
There’s also a long-standing fantasy of the politician who suddenly starts saying what he really thinks – and is elected by acclamation. Warren Beatty made a movie based on it – don’t remember the title.
Trump unites these two themes. (In reality, he self-censors more than it appears – for instance, he supports single-payer, for obvious business reasons, EXCEPT when he’s seeking the Republican nomination.) I didn’t think it would really work, but so far, it is. A recent poll showed him beating Hillary Clinton, the ultimate mealy-mouthed pro. That might get him the nomination.
Although outspoken, Sanders is actually much more of a politician – and he doesn’t say the sort of outrageous things that Trump does. At least, they don’t sound outrageous to us.
Trump’s positions, insofar as they’re known, are actually all over the map – on single payer and “free trade,” he’s well to the left of the Democratic Party. On other things, like immigration, he’s harshly right-wing. It’s perhaps more important that he’s running a cult of personality, which does make him potentially dangerous.
The Ventura election as a 3rd party candidate had him up against two sock puppets – Norm (f’n) Coleman and Skip Humphrey.
Trump looks to be in a similar position.
The Beatty movie is “Bulworth”
Here’s our “fearless leader” on the refugee crisis:
Here’s what Canadians think about that:
G20 eyes faster economic reforms.
Certainly, we don’t need to investment in more ghost cities, steel plant or on more copper mining.
Besides, we have ask why we need more ”growth.” To improve our material lives?
We can do that without growth, but with a better distribution of the world’s wealth.
And the best way to avoid doing that is to talk about growth and the need for more investments.
Personally, I think “free condoms for all” would go a long way towards greening the planet.
So that would be a start for needed infrastructure spending around the entire world. Condom factories everywhere – not just China. Tho after seeing data that indicated India had population growth over the last 20 years equal to the entire population of the US, they should get lots and lots of condom factories.
Then, hopefully the US can figure out some other worthwhile things to do.
I personally like Frank Herberts idea of a designed virus that makes you sterile until you do some difficult personal environment modifications to promote oogenesis. That way, two people would need to really want children to have them. Come on Darpa! You’re up to it!
There’s a reason the water supply is still public….
Mine isn’t, nor millions of people on wells.
I was JUST reading about that: http://www.salon.com/2015/09/06/why_the_g20s_new_infrastructure_plan_spells_doom_for_planet_earth_partner/ – “Experts warn a trillion-dollar investment in global infrastructure will cause “rapid ecological deterioration” ”
I was curious if the driven to kill Slate piece would be posted.. Based on my experiences in China in the late 1980’s early 90’s, no I don’t think it is sensationalism.
It’s a cultural thing that seems bizarre, as in savage to us, but so do many of the social norms of say ancient Greece, Rhome no less certain modern ME countries to name a few,,,and visa versa.
China is very, very different than the West, in particular the US. We see them embracing certain consumer manifestations of the West and we extrapolate that to the incorrect assumption they have the same sensibilities. They don’t, and we don’t get it.
Examining the rest of the world through our own idealized cultural lens and wanting to change it to reflect our own idealized self image is an expensive and futile American phenomena.
It is what it is, and in this case it’s Chinese. Creepy? Yes I sure think so. Any worse than putting freshly born baby girls out on the curb/ No not really.
I think a good way to find out is if we post the same article to say, people in Japan, India, Brazil, Canada, Egypt, and other countries, and see if there are some universal reactions to that article.
I suspect the universal reaction expressed will only be a reflection of people appalled by the behavior. I doubt people who really take no issue with it would comment candidly.
Hope your having a good holiday.. Beautiful weather here. The honeybees are getting drunk at a Hummingbird feeder that’s out in the Sun. I’ve been putting brown cane sugar and honey in it this year, seems to be a popular concoction. Funny to watch them when I walk by.
Be careful with the honey around hummingbirds. The bees may love it, but it can harm hummingbirds.
No worries, I use a concentrated concoction, Actually honey is naturally an antibacterial agent and I only add a bit. I also add a bit of maple syrup. I do a boiling reduction to remove water content. The secret is to keep it as anhydrous as possible, that’s why honey doesn’t naturally ferment. They all dig it , so its not around long anyway.
Honey is not a natural antibacterial agent except when undiluted; you can culture bacteria and molds out of it that were not dead but suppressed (botulism for example). The sole reason for its suppressive behavior is its hypertonic state; once diluted it is every bit as much food for microbes as table sugar.
I know it’s fashionable to revile white sugar but honey is not a safe substitute for it in nectar for hummingbirds (nor is it safe for human infants).
If you want to not feed sugar to hummers, plant more flowers that are adapted to feed them, which has the added advantage of not attracting heavy wasp populations.
J. G. Ballard lived in Shanghai before WW2 as a child and spent five years in an internment camp under Japanese control during that war. He has some informative observations about Chinese and Japanese attitudes towards life and children in particular in his autobiographical “Kingdom of the Sun.”
I’ve observed it first hand in post Mao China. It’s gruesome stuff, but not a new development.
I was on the highway between Beijing and the airport when it first opened, utter chaos that was a combination of mostly poorly driven vehicular traffic traveling too fast, pedestrians, bikes, oxcarts. What amazed me was the disregard each group had for the others. This was the case on surface roads as well in any city I was in. Bike riders and pedestrians that would literally step out into traffic without so much as a glance. car drivers that would drive into a literal sea of bikes and pedestrians which would part like a slow motion school of fish.. or not.
My only issue is we, Americans especially, learned this behavior when we were 16 except a certain aunt who will remain nameless. My Greek uncle is a maniac behind the wheel. In his spare time, he saves lives.
We didn’t start dumping modern death machines on a population who have been exposed to Hollywood car chases. Even our motor vehicles laws are in direct response to motorists who thought they had the right of way because they were motorists. This kind of happened in China and Eastern Europe. Our car behavior seems natural, but we had time between then introduction of the automobile and the 50s to make changes.
Its not sensationalism sadly – those stories have been around for a long time and there are numerous CCTV films out there to show it happening. It is regularly reported on Chinese news – although I think its so common now that only the most extreme cases get reported. Most Chinese people I know find it highly embarrassing.
I think it is a combination of the perverse incentives caused by otherwise admirable laws to ensure that those disabled by others carelessness are adequately compensated, and a general hierarchical society where people outside a particular social circle (and the victims are invariably the poorest) are not really deemed important.
It’s demographics; life is very cheap there.
For the Common Good:
The September 2015 NY Times Billboard
$4,500 Raised – $4,500 to Go – Thank You for Making It Possible!
After two days of fundraising, we are halfway to the $9,000 needed to pay for the September 2015 New York Times Billboard. Thank you to everyone who has contributed so far.
Here’s the story on this important opportunity. Just last week, the owners of the billboard across the street from The New York Times — a spot they usually sell for more than $20,000 — came to us with an unbelievable offer of $9,000 for four weeks.
We knew we couldn’t pass up this opportunity to amplify our message during the 9/11 anniversary. And so we are sharing it with you. If you would like to see this billboard go up next week, please chip in what you can by the end of Labor Day weekend to help make it possible.
Now is our opportunity to send that message even more loudly. And to make sure they have no excuse not to look at the evidence, we’ll be mailing the Beyond Misinformation booklet to every editor and reporter who works in The New York Times Building. Of course, it’s not just about The New York Times: Our impossible-to-miss billboard will also be seen by 100,000 people each day. That means a total of three million views during the month of September.
Please help us capture the attention of the nation’s “newspaper of record” — and of millions of New Yorkers and tourists — by making a modest contribution this Labor Day weekend.
Thank you for helping to make this the most educational 9/11 anniversary yet.
The AE911Truth Team
re Margaret Atwood: The geezer vote
lost my lunch on the first two comments:
I haven’t read any of her books and, after that first HDS article, I haven’t read her writings here. Atwood doesn’t offer anything more than the puerile thoughts of the Lefties frequenting this comment board. Has she said anything insightful, or just spiteful?
55 votes Up no Downs
JJRoss Pavane •
The article above is neither entertaining nor informative.
I agree with you, it is simply spiteful.
55 votes UP no Downs
i understand ‘our’ privatization of curiosity but does Canada recognize theirs?
“Ignoring isn’t the same as ignorance, you have to work at it.” MA
“Don’t let the bastards grind you down…MA
Agree. If you read a little further down in comments, it levels off a tad. We are in a crappy period of history (ha,ha, just when we need our wits the most).
Please explain “privatization of curiosity.”
In short, promotion is
athe signal that one should be more than superficially interested in something.
yeah, what you said.
(btw, your comments are my favorite krav maga mental w/o(s)!)
the capitalization of MSM, social media, technology for the few and shock oracles exterminate, through fear and shame, curiosity by dictating belief systems. a few quotes come to mind:
“I have a foreboding of an America in my children’s or grandchildren’s time — when the United States is a service and information economy; when nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries; when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few, and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues; when the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority; when, clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good and what’s true, we slide, almost without noticing, back into superstition and darkness…
The dumbing down of American is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content in the enormously influential media, the 30 second sound bites (now down to 10 seconds or less), lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudoscience and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance”
“The essence of capitalism is to turn nature into commodities and commodities into capital. The live green earth is transformed into dead gold bricks, with luxury items for the few and toxic slag heaps for the many. The glittering mansion overlooks a vast sprawl of shanty towns, wherein a desperate, demoralized humanity is kept in line with drugs, television, and armed force.”
Parenti, Against Empire
“I am often asked the question How can the masses permit themselves to be exploited by the few. The answer is By being persuaded to identify with them.”
“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.” I. Asimov
“Thinkers aren’t limited by what they know, because they can always increase what they know. Rather they’re limited by what puzzles them, because there’s no way to become curious about something that doesn’t puzzle you.”
Quinn, My Ishmael
screw thirsty….stay puzzled my friends ‘ )
Trump, after Republican pledge, breaks from pack on Iran, gay marriage | Reuters
He actually sounds shockingly sane – by GOP standards – on Iran and the KY-clerk sideshow. What’s this heretical talk about being a ‘nation of laws’?
Today’s “antidote” (and to what, exactly?) reminds me of an old family favorite (our name is not Addams). The vulturine references are, in my estimation, the jewels for which the routine as a whole forms an elegant setting.
“Another Lot,” by Spike Milligan
re: predator prey models. there have been predator/prey models for a century. the way the dynamic works ie the growth rate differentials maybe different than in the existing literature but this is really just an adjustment to existing models, not a “brand new” mathematical model. I think that story is badly written.
for us map lovers…40 maps that explain the Middle East
(sorry if this is a repost…but dang!)
the above maps are out dating quickly…
This year is described as the driest year in the last decade and as a result the agricultural sector, which uses an average of 70 percent of all water sources, will be negatively influenced and food prices may increase. The decline in water levels in dams could negatively affect electricity generation and suppliers may have to resort to other sources such as natural gas. In order to plan effectively, we must consider not only the environmental effects of drought but also the social and economic consequences.
The effects of drought can be clearly seen in the Middle East. Under normal conditions, only one-fourth of the world’s average precipitation falls in the Middle East. What’s worse is that this year rainfall was at its lowest level in 60 years, especially in Jordan. This period of drought was also seen in Lebanon, Iraq and Syria, and adversely affected water sources and agricultural activities. This year, food imports will rise in the Middle East, which is already the biggest importer of food in the world. In Syria, where a civil war still rages, this year’s rainfall was half of the annual average. Experts say that drought will be particularly severe in the cities of Aleppo, Idlib and Hama.
Additionally, the demand for water within a growing population, concern for food security, unproductive use of water resources and the lack of modern irrigation techniques in agriculture causes a major loss of water and further deterioration of the situation. In order to use water efficiently, water management strategies should be regulated and public awareness raised. In addition, climate change will alter the management and functioning of present hydraulic structures (hydroelectric, flood control, drainage and irrigation systems).
detailed data: The new climate normal
Syrian refugee camp in Jordan
If the world measures a refugee according to the worst story, we will always excuse human suffering, saying it is not yet as bad as someone else’s.”