Yves here. While we don’t give financial advice, a forecast here and there gives readers something to debate. Prins gives a much wider ranging set of predictions than most commentators do. I’m not on board with all of her views (as you will see, she’s far more sanguine about Brexit than we are), but many of her points, particularly that central bank tightening will be mainly bark and hardly any bite, seem sound.
By Nomi Prins, a renowned journalist, author and speaker. She is currently at work on a new book, Collusion (formerly called Artisans of Money), that will explore the recent rise of the role of central banks in the global financial and economic hierarchy. Originally published at her website
Happy New Year to all of you!
In last year’s roadmap, I forecast that 2017 would end with gold prices up and the dollar index down, both of which happened. I underestimated the number of Fed hikes by one hike, but globally, average short term rates have remained around zero. That will be a core pattern throughout 2018.
Central banks may tweak a few rates here and there, announce some tapering due to “economic growth”, or deflect attention to fiscal policy, but the entire financial and capital markets system rests on the strategies, co-dependencies and cheap money policies of central banks. The bond markets will feel the heat of any tightening shift or fears of one, while the stock market will continue to rush ahead on the reality of cheap money supply until debt problems tug at the equity markets and take them down.
Central bankers are well aware of this. They have no exit plan for their decade of collusion. But a weak hope that it’ll all work out. They have no dedicated agenda to remove themselves from their money supplier role, nor any desire to do so. Truth be told, they couldn’t map out an exit route from cheap money even if they wanted to.
The total books of global central banks (that hold the spoils of QE) have ballooned by $2 Trillion in assets (read: debt) over 2017. That brings the amount of global central banks holdings to more than $21.7 trillion in assets. And growing. Teasers about tapering have been released into the atmosphere, but numbers don’t lie.
That’s a hefty cushion for international speculation. Every bond a central bank buys or holds, gets a price-lift. Trillions of dollars of such buys have artificially lifted all bond prices, and stocks because of the secondary-lift effect and rapacious search for self-perpetuating returns. Financial bubbles pervade the world.
Central bank leaders may wax hawkish –manifested in strong words but tepid actions. Yet, overall, policies will remain consistent with those of the past decade to combat this looming crisis. US nationalistic trade policies will push other nations to embrace agreements with each other that exclude the US and shun the US dollar.
And finally! My new book Collusion: How Central Bankers Rigged the World comes out on May 1. 2018. You can see my book tour schedule evolve over the next few months on my website. I look forward to seeing you at the upcoming events.
Meanwhile, here are some themes to watch for 2018:
1) Central Bank “Tightening” and “Tapering”: More Talk than Action
The Fed predicted three hikes for 2017, and for the first time in three years of announcing rate increases, met its own forecast. Thus, Federal Funds Rates rose by 75 basis points.
In Europe, the European Central Bank (ECB) kept rates in the zero percent range. Gearing up to Brexit, the Bank of England raised rates by a mere 25 basis points. In Japan, the Bank of Japan (BOJ) kept rates negative. The People’s Bank of China (PBoC) didn’t alter its benchmark rate this year, though it did increase its medium-term lending facility and its open market reverse repo agreements by a whopping 15 basis points in 2017. Those aren’t exactly definitive tightening bias moves.
The ECB announced a “tapering” bias, but in practice, merely cut its monthly purchasing pledge while extending the total period of purchasing. This was a typical central bank ‘bait-and-switch’ maneuver, the net effect of which will be more QE, not less.
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s snap election victory last fall secured BOJ head, Haruhiko Kuroda in his spot, or at least, provided a green light for more easy money provisions to the Japanese capital markets.
In the US, Jerome Powell will assume the helm at of the Fed on February 4. How different will his policies be from those of Janet Yellen or Ben Bernanke? Not much. He voted in favor of the Fed’s monetary easing programs (even with hesitation) every time. Powell will embrace the same unlimited easy money policy on any sign of market weakness, as the global web of central banks remains as omnipresent as ever.
2) Rising Stock Markets for Now; But on Shakier Ground
Global stock markets, being the easiest place to park cheap money will rise at first in 2018. This will take place on the back of another spurt of record corporate buybacks. The move will carry on due to a self-fulfilling prophesy of return-seekers (from hedge to pension funds) until met by a span of corporate or bank scandals or geo-political risk.
In the US, the Dow Jones finished the year up 28.11% adjusted for dividends (compared to 16.47% adjusted for dividends in 2016.) President Trump took credit for the equity euphoria, as Obama and other presidents have done in the past.
The reality is that stock markets were bolstered by historically cheap money and more than $14 trillion of QE. If the Fed (or any major central bank) was to unwind the $4.5 trillion of assets it’s holding, markets would plummet. That’s why the Fed isn’t moving much, nor are other central banks, to truly reduce the size of their artificial market intervention. But when markets fall back to earth – the drop will be quick and painful.
On the flipside, there’s economic reality. Job growth is at its slowest pace since 2011, wage growth is relatively stagnant and job market participation sits at four-decade lows. While the stock market continues to shatter records, the real economy remains left behind.
3) Expanding Debt and Corporate Defaults
Debt is at epic levels any way you slice it, public debt, corporate debt, credit card debt, student loan debt. There will be a tipping point – when money coming in to furnish that debt, or available to borrow, simply won’t cover the interest payments. Then debt bubbles will pop, beginning with higher yielding bonds. Leverage is a patient enemy.
Fueled by low rates and a strong investor appetite, debt of nonfinancial companies in the US has accelerated rapidly, to $8.7 trillion, a figure equivalent to more than 45 percent of GDP. Nonfinancial corporate debt outstanding grew by $1 trillion over the past two years. US tax cuts will propel more issuance at first, due to the perception of more money available later with which to repay it. That is not the same as actual profits.
This is the year where borrowing fueled by central banks slams into a wall of growing defaults. Expect corporate defaults to rise on the back of even slight rate hikes. Defaults will deepen in non-Asian emerging markets first. That’s because those currencies haven’t done as well against the US dollar as in other countries, and central banks and governments aren’t as able to sustain that debt through various intervention maneuvers.
Meanwhile, major central banks will find ways to fuel corporate bond markets to stave that crisis off as long as they can. The ECB’s corporate buying program kicked into high gear in 2017, for instance, driving corporate spreads and rates downward. The ECB’s corporate sector purchasing program (CSPP) will expand the ECB’s corporate bond holdings to over 20 percent of its whole book, double today’s percentage.
Other central banks will try to do the same, but face headwinds. China has a $3.4 trillion corporate bond market showing signs of struggle. With more than $1 trillion of local bonds maturing in 2018-19, it will become increasingly expensive for Chinese companies to roll over financing, which is why the PBoC will maintain its QE programs in 2018.
4) Weakening Dollar, Rising Gold and Silver Prices
The dollar index that tracks the dollar against other major currencies (including the Euro and the Pound sterling) hit 14-year lows in 2017. As the index dropped accelerated, it exhibited a counter-historical diversion from the behavior of the US stock market. That pattern looks set to continue in 2018, despite any minor US rate increases that did not serve to bolster the dollar against other major country currencies last year.
It’s also counter-intuitive for the currency coupled with rising rates to underperform the one with easier policy. Yet, that’s what happened between the US dollar and the Euro in 2017. The Euro’s surge will carry on given that its strength better reflects surrounding economic reality, than the dollar does for the US, where the stock market has far outpaced economic factors like wages and job force participation levels.
Similarly, gold and silver will rise against the US dollar, as bitcoin enthusiasts and gold bugs converge. Nations like China, India and Russia continued to stockpile gold in their quest to diversify against the dollar last year. China’s Gold Bar Demand rose by more than 40%. The more gold these nations buy, the more the dollar could decline relative to their currencies, especially if they sell US treasuries, or reduce purchases, to buy gold. Even my old firm, Goldman Sachs noted the bitcoin boom hasn’t dampened gold demand.
5) Ongoing Economic Power Shift from the West to the East
The economic power shift from West to East, and from the US dollar to the Chinese yuan, will continue for economic and geo-political reasons as China forges more solid global trade relationships and the US retains its nationalist stance.
Given the Trump administration’s isolationist and pro-bilateral trade agreement doctrine, China will augment its economic, military and diplomatic presence globally. The Chinese government has invested billions in the BRICS Development Bank and Asian regional organizations like ASEAN. That type of long-term groundwork will expand in 2018.
As it did in 2017, Japan embarked upon greater cooperation with India and Russia to hedge its US relationships. The Japanese economy also hit a growth streak in 2017. Its economy has been expanding since the start of 2016, the longest streak since 1999.
Japan will keep developing its Eastern influence and seek new relationships as Prime Minister Abe consolidates his power. For the Bank of Japan, that means, despite some talk to the contrary, maintaining its aggressive QE program. The ongoing supply of cheap money will provide a bid to the Japanese stock market and massive liquidity to its banks.
6) Easy ECB policy / Sterling Rising into Brexit
In 2015, Mario Draghi, the head of the ECB, decided to extend Euro-QE into March 2017. Then, he extended Euro-QE to December 2017, with a promise to do more if necessary. There was taper talk in the ECB’s QE program this year. In October, the ECB announced, that starting in January 2018, its asset purchases will follow a monthly pace of €30 billion until the end of September 2018, “or beyond, if necessary.” Ultimately, on an absolute value basis, the move was camouflage that will lead to more QE for Europe, not less.
Over in the United Kingdom, having fallen 14% in 2016 due to Brexit anxiety, the Pound executed an impressive rise helped along the way by the BOE’s 25 basis rate hike. The Pound recorded its best annual performance against the dollar since 2009, with an almost 10 percent rise. Meanwhile, the Euro gained an impressive 14.1 percent vs. the dollar.
Brexit is still looming. Yet, the Sterling has had a good run, and given the receding uncertainty over what Brexit could look like, this trend should extend in 2018. Once everyone realizes that UK banks aren’t moving to Frankfurt no matter what Brexit looks like, the Sterling will outperform the Euro. This will be positive for UK banks that have better capital cushions and are considered more stable.
7) Infrastructure Focus
Currently, the US federal government spends about a modest $100 billion annually on infrastructure. States and cities have tapped out at $320 billion in allocated funding. How they could afford increases at more than double that rate is a mystery.
Yet, the US remains at a huge infrastructure disadvantage relative to Asia and Europe. Any official talk of a bill combined with associated news coverage alone would lift bidding interest for government contracts, and share prices of companies in the sector.
And we will hear more talk about a bi-partisan infrastructure bill and associated public-private partnerships in the wake of the Trump – GOP tax bill victory and into his second year in office. The problem is that his proposed spending of at least $200 billion over the next decade is contingent on $800 billion coming from state and local sources. Many states don’t have the budget to meet such infrastructure demands. This means other funding or increased federal spending will be hotly debated in 2018. Engineering and infrastructure companies will reap the benefits of related expectations and attention.
8) Cryptomania Grips More Tightly
As for Bitcoin, despite its predisposition to being a Ponzi scheme, it should rise (and sustain its high degree of volatility) through 2018 for a few reasons. First, many funds have been green lighted to get involved in the second half of 2018 and ETF’s are on the horizon, albeit with a plethora of surrounding problems and regulatory hesitations. Second, futures exchange activity will broaden the market. Third, establishment banks like Goldman Sachs have announced plans to set up crypto-trading desks and promoted the possibility of bitcoin becoming a legitimate global currency.
There will be growth of the number and diversity of exchanges beyond Coinbase in the manner of PayPal which is already a player in that space, as well as for Coinbase itself. Expect the start of many payment exchanges that can process both regular currencies and cryptocurrency transactions ala the dot com bubble, rendering the idea of crypto-independence more and more fuzzy.
Conversations amongst the financial elite at G7 gatherings and other similar forums will encapsulate more crypto focus. Central banks will ultimately create or utilize some elements of crypto currencies for themselves, and adopt ways to regulate the market, as will regulatory agencies that will focus more on crypto than regular banking activities (both need that monitoring to protect people.) Meanwhile, there will be more buying of cheaper crypto currencies (or assets as I consider them) like Litecoin and Ripple. The fight between those that believe in crypto’s decentralized nature will hit a wall of resistance from banks and central banks, but that fight might take years.
9) Going Digital and Green
Whether you use it, invest in it, or are wary of it – one thing is certain, mining crypto currencies require substantial amounts of power. While Bitcoin’s value was up seven-fold in 2017, its power requirements shot up by 43% just since October. Much of this power comes from generators fed by fossil fuel sources. That’s not clean power.
Green technology for uses in blockchain related products will be a hot area in 2018, as will be clean and renewable sources of energy in general. Solar energy costs have fallen 62% since 2009 and could be cheaper than coal in less than a decade. As traditional fossil fuel economies from Saudi Arabia to Mexico begin to shift, green competition could drive down these costs further in 2018 and render clean energy more profitable.
Beyond the crypto space, green jobs will boom, in some countries more than in others. China continues its efforts at a record pace has pledged to spend up to $1 trillion on infrastructure projects in 64 countries with which it seeks to strengthen alliances. Much of that will go into sustainable energy investments. China leads the world in investment in renewable energy projects with an estimated $32 billion spent overseas.
Sustainable energy means jobs elsewhere, too. In 2018, Tesla plans to open the biggest battery factory in the world in Nevada. The UK government has announced massive £246 million investment in the automotive electrification research and development sector.
10) Dangers of Trump’s Deregulation Entourage
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the regulatory agency tasked with protecting investors, shareholders and citizens from fraudulent financial system activities, is currently run by a man that served as Goldman Sachs’ outside counsel during its subprime crisis related spate of settlements. Goldman Sachs requested of him, that it be released from annual reporting of its lobbying policies or payments.
He’s not alone in those sorts of allegiances. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is run by a former colleague of Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Joseph Otting, who was the CEO of OneWest (the formerly failed California-based bank, IndyMac). That’s the bank that Mnuchin and his billionaire friends took over before exacting alleged tens of thousands of foreclosures and turning it around for a hefty profit. Then there’s the Fed, where Jerome Powell has expressed his disinterest in bank regulations over the years. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is now run by Mick Mulvaney – a man that has derided the very existence of the agency.
Ultimately, the mother of all deregulators is presiding over the US Treasury Department. Steven Mnuchin has deflected the notion of reinstatement of a modern Glass-Stegall at every possible moment. He waived away regulation for AIG, the reckless insurance company at the epicenter of the financial crisis, by giving the firm a green light to stop reporting risk details to the Financial Stability Oversight Council over which he presides.
Trump speaks of deregulation with pride. Nearly every regulatory body in his purview tasked with monitoring the financial system is run by someone who has benefited from its unfair practices or somehow believes too much regulation over bailed out big banks is a bad thing. Historically, severe crises follow periods of lax oversight and loose bank regulations. The question isn’t “if” there’s one budding, but “when” it will happen.
The last time deregulation and protectionist businessmen filled the US presidential cabinet was in the 1920s. That led to the Crash of 1929, the Great Depression, and ultimately, brought us to World War II as I explained in All the Presidents’ Bankers.
During the past decade, the helium that inflated asset bubbles and fortified the global banking system was central bank Collusion. At some point the financial dam is destined to break – it has to, and it will. On that sober note, I leave you with this quote from The Rich Boy written in 1926 before the Great Depression by F. Scott Fitzgerald:
“The world, as a rule, does not live on beaches and in country clubs.”
Whoever we are and wherever we live, may we face the challenges of this year, and our times, with awareness, courage and action.
‘The problem is that [Trump’s] proposed spending of at least $200 billion over the next decade is contingent on $800 billion coming from state and local sources. Many states don’t have the budget to meet such infrastructure demands.’ — Nomi Prins
Indeed they do not. In the four US states with the sickest pensions, paying down their
Ponzi schemesunfunded obligations over a generous 30 years, while earning a generous 6 percent annual return, still produces grim numbers. Namely, all four would be obliged to devote over 30 percent of their state budget to pensions:
“The big question: Will courts allow modifications of pension benefits with respect to future years of work by public employees?” asks the author. Because what can’t be paid, won’t be paid. Puerto Rico already has demonstrated that cranking taxes to painful levels (e.g. its 11.5% sales tax) not only does not stave off bankruptcy, but also induces residents to flee their fleecing.
Something has to give. And what usually gives in the carpe diem US is more borrowing by states. After all, loose GASB accounting ‘standards’ [sic] don’t require them to make up pension underfunding, or even make ‘required’ [sic] contributions. Money’s cheap, so let’s borrow some, build some roads, bridges and stations named for heroic living political leaders, and let tomorrow worry about itself. :-)
This is why dramatically reducing SALT deductions was clearly a divisive political assault.
The rehetoric on Capital Hill is about pushing costs down to state and local governments, yet they just made the execution of that much more difficult for the states and localities. I was writing my Republican Congressman that they should be expanding the SALT deduction to allow all easy to estimate state and local taxes (property, income, & sales taxes) to be summed up and deducted. That would give states and localities great freedom on deciding how they want to raise funds to cover the many costs that they will have to cover.
Of course, the easy alternative is to allow the US to continue to devolve into a Third World country. JFK Airport appears to have nearly accomplished that feat over the past few weeks.
And yet from another view, it is the insistence that the entire country needs to subsidize local taxes in a few states that ran up unsustainable obligations that is “clearly a divisive political assault.” That is especially true given the overt contempt with which we are addressed by politicians and non-politicians alike.
And no, this is not a new phenomenon driven by Trump derangement syndrome. Shortly after 9/11, I flew out of New York to Rapid City, SD. The gate agent sneered at me, “I guess *someone* has to live there.” I could go on and on, but you get the drift.
Interesting that three of the four states facing that problem have significant portions of their state falling under the metro areas of cities in bordering states (NYC for Connecticut, NYC and Philly for Jersey, Cincinnati for Kentucky).
None of the options presented are optimal. Tax hikes drive off individuals and businesses that have mobility, budget cuts wreck infrastructure and education which makes a state less attractive to businesses, and cut benefits and/or increasing contributions for public employees, which weeds out more qualified candidates and reduces the quality of government service. The better option would be more federal dollars flowing into those states (with the exception of Kentucky, those are all states that pay more in taxes than they receive in federal spending), as that spending plays by a different set of debt rules.
The methodology on the calculations on who receives more in federal spending than pays it has always been unsound because it ignores the fact that the coasts benefit from colonizing the interior of the country. For example, PILTS (payments in lieu of taxes) which the feds pay as a fraction of the property taxes that would be paid if the Feds did not own vast tracts of land in the West and Plains count as federal spending despite the benefits going primarily out of state, and they do not count the resulting outflows or the foregone revenue against the PILTs. If they did, you would see that my county, for instance, pays a monetary price for having pretty places you say we can’t use so the rest of the country can look at them. I don’t object to that, although the abuse of locals by the Feds as well as the claims that we are somehow freeloaders gets a bit tiresome. And that doesn’t begin to address the ecologically unsound land management practices we are forced into as the result of a cheap food policy to benefit the country as a whole.
That was done under the Great Society (LBJ). The federal government directly subsidized state budgets. It was called “revenue sharing”. That takes advantage of the feds’ ability to mint money, which the states don’t have (perhaps they were unwise to give that up). Of course, a lot of that already happens, but the money is earmarked.
The real point here is that the only practical way to increase infrastructure spending is with federal dollars. That was how the interstates were built.
An issue with MMT just occurred to me: it means that sovereign spending is limited only by real resources; but how do you know when you’re reaching that limit? Seems to me it would always be after the fact: “oops, that was too much.” It’s happened before. And some claim that there hasn’t been real economic growth in the US for quite a long time; hence the bubbles. If we’re limited out, then it goes back to a zero sum game. One sign would be that real incomes are stagnant or falling.
Trump WANTS bankrupt states! Trump WANTS a diminished muni bond market.
It opens the door to public private partnerships (known in UK as PFI).
File under CB emotional factors….
>While Bitcoin’s value was up seven-fold in 2017, its power requirements shot up by 43%
Stupidest thing ever. I can grow X, sell what I don’t eat for cash, and then in the future use said cash to buy (maybe grown in the other hemisphere) X when I’m hungry and my fields are fallow. I would do that because “X” is perishable but the overall demand is constant.
BItcoin is created via electricity. Can I turn Bitcoin back into electricity, even by the roundabout method I just listed to “transform” bananas and dollars back and forth? Nope.
So it’s just a joke, except nobody is going to be laughing. No reason at this point to underestimate our betters ability to share, or even shirk, the pain their actions cause.
Bitcoin and the like represent funds being driven out of the currency and banking system. Apparently there are a lot of them.
Is that actually displaced inflation?
“while the stock market will continue to rush ahead on the reality of cheap money supply until debt problems tug at the equity markets and take them down.”
Corporate profits are at record highs, as long as the rate of return on stock buybacks outpaces the interest they are paying on debt they will be fine. Keep the merry-go-round spinning!
“The Euro’s surge will carry on given that its strength better reflects surrounding economic reality, than the dollar does for the US, where the stock market has far outpaced economic factors like wages and job force participation levels”
This is questionable. The stock market IS economic reality for the people that matter. The Euro economy has deep structural problems that are not able to resolve themselves without serious changes, whereas the US economy is, illusory wealth notwithstanding, on much more solid ground in the long run. I believe the dollar will make some gains this year for the simple reason that it is the least worst, and the reserve currency, and remains the largest economy in the world.
” Japan embarked upon greater cooperation with India and Russia to hedge its US relationships. ”
It’s China they’re hedging – look at the geography. An interesting contrast between those countries: India is definitely a rival to China; there was a military faceoff very recently. India, IMO, got China to back down by taking an interest in the S. China Sea conflict. Russia, on the other hand, has been getting closer to China. So it’s a hedge in the full sense that Japan is betting on BOTH approaches. Of course, both are also enormous markets. And nuclear powers.
One of the things that indicate an empire iss declning is that proxy states start negotiating new agreements with strategic competitors.
Duterte dissing Obama was one notable example. Japan with India and Russia is another
Thank you for this post. Appreciated Nomi Prins’ discussion of relative US dollar weakness despite positive and rising US interest rates versus low and even negative interest rates in the EU and Japan. Appears to me that US policy elites are gradually squandering global reserve currency status through their geopolitical policies, but maybe that is itself intentional?
The domestic status quo seems well entrenched, but I agree with Nomi Prins that the debt leverage of borrowers who are not monetary sovereigns will ultimately be a causal agent for change if an “Unknown Unknown” doesn’t appear first. Her observation: “Leverage is a patient enemy,” has been born out in our recent past, although I suspect few will appreciate the aftermath. Besides the excesses of central banks monetary-interest rate policies, that the “Deregulation Entourage” continues to have free reign to impose their will on public policy is likely to contribute to the severity of the next downturn.
So you’re a central banker, and you’re hoping things will keep limping along until you can get back to your private sector gig. But to kick that can, you may have to raise rates, and you can’t get away with that without economic growth. Where do you find such “growth”? The stock market, of course! Focus everyone on rising stock prices, and pretend that means actual growth. Then raise rates. Stock prices will deflate (along with everything else), but the People Who Matter will have already shorted and left the marks holding the big bag of pain (The marks will include everyone who has had to go into the markets as part of the New Social Security. They will also include pension funds, public and private. Public will become a bigger load on those chumps who actually have to pay taxes. Private will be converted to public courtesy Chapter 11 plans and the good offices of the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation.). Yet another wealth transfer from the Have-Nothings to the Have-Alls. Then drop rates back down to “spur growth”, and spin the merry-go-round again.