A Round-Up of Anti-Covid Nasal Spray Research

By Lambert Strether of Corrente

Anybody who lived through the Studio 54 Era knows that the nose is an effective delivery system for all sorts of substances. SARS-COV-2 understand this, too, and uses the nose as a, almost certainly the, main entry point for Covid-19 infection. Journal of Clinical Investigations, “Nasal ciliated cells are primary targets for SARS-CoV-2 replication in the early stage of COVID-19” (July 1, 2021), from the Discussion:

The epithelium in the upper respiratory tract is a frontline barrier in the battle against SARS-CoV-2, which is transmitted through respiratory aerosols or droplets. Our findings clearly indicate that among the variety of cells composing the upper respiratory epithelia, differentiated multiciliated cells of the nasal respiratory epithelium are the primary targets for SARS-CoV-2 infection and multiplication. SARS-CoV-2–containing respiratory aerosols or droplets from patients with COVID-19 could initially be trapped in the mucus of the nasal cavity. The receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 would be exposed and bound to ACE2, which is highly abundant in the apical surface membrane in fully differentiated ciliated cells of the nasal cavity.

The “graphical abstract”:

I wouldn’t go so far as to say that mouth-breathers (see “human oral squamous epithelium” above) are in no danger, but it does seem clear that nasal tissue is the key “frontline barrier” — which sometimes fails. The nose knows, as Parliament Funkadelic has it.

In parallel to clinical investigations, there has been quite a lot of activity in Covid nasal sprays, and so I thought I’d aggregate what I’ve been seeing into the following buckets: vaccination, treatment, and prophylaxis. (Prophylaxis is very low-tech and non-prescription, and so very attractive to me.) Except for one or two examples, none are on the market. Nor have any reached the clinical trial stage. However, development is very rapid, and to me the theory of the case — kill, treat, or defeat the virus at the front line — makes so much sense that I am conceptually long nasal sprays. Also, no icky needles! Of course, I don’t offer either investment or medical advice. So here are the buckets. Make of them what you will!


There are several efforts to use nasal sprays to deliver vaccines. From Chemical & Engineering News:

Our mucosal immune cells make a special class of antibodies that are constantly secreted from the mucous membranes to protect the nose, gut, and other vulnerable sites from pathogens we’ve seen in the past. “But if you don’t stimulate the immune system in the mucosae, you don’t obtain mucosal immune responses,” says Pierre Charneau, head of the Molecular Virology and Vaccinology Unit at the Pasteur Institute.

Yet most research on SARS-CoV-2 and our immune systems has overlooked mucosal immunity in favor of the easier-to-study systemic immunity.

Drunks under the lamp-post looking for the quick buck, as usual.

“When the pandemic hit last year and I started to see papers coming out about immunity, it really quite staggered me to see an absence of attention to the mucosal immune response,” Russell says.

Charneau and a group of scientists in Paris have shown that natural SARS-CoV-2 infections trigger both systemic and mucosal immunity. But our current crop of COVID-19 vaccines offer only systemic protection. Developing vaccines that are sprayed up the nose, rather than injected into the arm, could change that, Charneau says. Mucosal immunity in our noses could be like a guard at the door, potentially helping stop even small infections of SARS-CoV-2 right where they start.

I don’t want to seem overly anti-triumphalist, but it does seem odd that we’re neglecting to research an entire immune response!

It’s a tantalizing notion, but whether it’s a viable one is up for debate.

Intranasal vaccines have historically garnered little interest and investment in the vaccine industry—a situation some hope that COVID-19 could change. Although the COVID-19 vaccines authorized in the US and Europe are incredibly effective, we don’t have enough of them to vaccinate the whole world. Intranasal vaccines, which might be easier to use and distribute than needle-based vaccines, could help close the gap. They could also make for useful booster shots against emerging variants of the virus. And if they work for COVID-19, some immunologists hope that they could kick off a new wave of investment in intranasal vaccines for other diseases.

The most interesting nasal vaccine project is from Rokote Laboratories in Finland. From Pharmaceutical Technology:

Rokote Laboratories Finland Ltd is set to launch a nasal spray Covid-19 vaccine that uses gene transfer technology.

Developed at the University of Eastern Finland by the research group of academy professor Seppo Ylä-Herttuala, the technology has already been used in several clinical trials successfully with gene therapy to treat cardiovascular diseases and cancer.

The nasal spray vaccine is based on research conducted at the University of Helsinki (UHEL) and the University of Eastern Finland (UEF).

It uses a safe adenovirus carrier with a cloned DNA strand, which causes nasopharyngeal cells to make the virus protein, producing a vaccine response.

According to preliminary results, the vaccine has worked well in animal studies and is set to enter clinical testing in humans in a few months….

Professor Ylä-Herttuala said: “Vaccines injected intramuscularly produce IgG antibodies in the bloodstream, but nasal vaccines also produce an IgA response that protects mucous membranes.

But there are two snags:

They say one problem is the arrival of other vaccines, as clinical trials of vaccines require large numbers of people who have not yet been vaccinated. Meanwhile, because the inoculation is based on open source tech and not patented, enthusiasm among pharmaceutical companies for backing the project has been minimal.

Never occurred to me than an early clinical trial was a barrier to entry. But so they are! However, Rokote did receive the trivial nine million Euros they needed to proceed. (Where’s mighty benefactor Bill Gates on this, anyhow?)

A second nasal vaccine project is taking place at the University of Iowa. From the Gazette:

In partnership with the University of Georgia, a UI team recently published promising findings showing a single-dose inhaled COVID-19 vaccine fully protected mice against lethal infections and also blocked animal-to-animal transmission. Those findings — published this month in the journal “Science Advances” [see here] — could lead to a clinical trial in humans this fall, according to Paul McCray, pediatrics-pulmonary professor in the UI Department of Microbiology and Immunology, who co-authored the intranasal vaccine study.

“This vaccine platform, compared to some things, is simpler to manufacture,” McCray said, noting it doesn’t need extremely-cold storage, involves just one dose and doesn’t require a syringe.

“If you think about where we are in the pandemic, most people in the world haven’t had the opportunity to be vaccinated,” he said. “In some areas of the world, issues related to refrigeration are significant. And even having all the needles and syringes and everything to do it could be an impediment. So this approach may have some advantages.”

And no danger of needle re-use, either, as often happens in poor countries.

A third project comes from Australia’s Avance Clinical. From the Guardian:

Australia is set to host the first human clinical trial of a genetically modified adenovirus vaccine for Covid-19 delivered via nasal spray.

Avance Clinical, an Australian contract research organisation, has applied to the office of the gene technology regulator for permission to conduct the phase 1 clinical trial on behalf US company Tetherex Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

The trial from June to September proposes using genetic modification to prevent the virus multiplying and insert a gene encoding the Sars-Cov-2 spike protein to help people produce antibodies against Covid-19.

Guardian Australia understands that Australian science agency CSIRO has conducted preclinical studies, yet to be published, which found nasal sprays compare favourably with injections when it comes to effectively building immunity to Covid.

A fourth project came from US company Altimmune, in partnership between India’s Bharat Biotech in India, Washington University, and AstraZeneca, but was halted after poor trial results.


First, from IGM Biosciences in Texas , an “antibody-laden nasal spray“:

A nasal spritz of a designer antibody offers strong protection against variants of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 — at least in mice.

[Zhiqiang An, an antibody engineer at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston] and his colleagues set out to engineer an antibody that could be delivered directly into the nose. They scanned a library of antibodies from healthy humans and zeroed in on those that were able to recognize a component of SARS-CoV-2 that the virus uses to latch on to and enter cells2. Among the promising candidates were IgG antibodies, which are relatively slow to appear after an infection but are precisely tailored to the invading pathogen.

The team stitched IgG fragments targeting SARS-CoV-2 to a different type of molecule: IgM antibodies, which act as speedy first-responders to a broad range of infection.

When squirted into the noses of mice either six hours before or six hours after infection, the engineered IgMs sharply reduced the amount of virus in the rodents’ lungs two days after infection

IGM Biosciences, a biotechnology company in Mountain View, California, that collaborated in An’s study, will test this antibody in clinical trials.

Second, from SaNOtize in Canada (manufactured in Israel). The Jerusalem Post:

An anti-viral nasal spray called Enovid that was developed in Canada and tested in the UK can reduce the viral loads in confirmed COVID-19 cases by 95% in 24 hours and 99% in 72 hours, a press release said on Sunday.

The Israeli-manufactured spray can be used up to five times a day after coming in contact with viruses, according to the release. It’s suitable for children as young as 12 years old, and the Ministry of Health approved it in January this year. It will go on sale in the coming week [i.e., this week].

“The spray we developed has been proven not only as a virus blocker that causes Covid-19 but also as a killer,” Dr. Gili Regev, CEO and founder of Snotize (the company that developed the spray) said.

Since most COVID-19 infections are nasal, SaNOtize believes this is an effective way to reduce the spread and infection of COVID-19. It has been able to suppress the SARS-CoV-2 virus within two minutes, including the Alpha and Gamma variants, according to the release. It is currently being tested against the Delta variant.

The spray employs nitric oxide as a mechanical and chemical barrier against viral infection in the nose, which is where respiratory diseases like COVID-19 infiltrate the body.

(NOTE: Nitric oxide is not nitrous oxide, despite what my Studio 54 reference suggests.)

Finally, an ingredient used in nose sprays, Carrageenan . From Pharmacology Research and Perspective:

Carrageenan is a sulfated polysaccharide extracted from red seaweed, commonly known as Irish Moss. Since the 1980s, carrageenan has been shown to prevent infections due to several viruses in cell cultures, including influenza viruses, coronavirus OC43, rhinoviruses, and coxsackievirus. A few very recent studies showed that carrageenan can inhibit the replication of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Mortality of mice infected by influenza A and by herpes simplex was significantly decreased by mucosally administered carrageenan, which indicates that the effects on respiratory viruses are not limited to cell cultures. Carrageenan has been used as a food component for decades and is classified by the FDA as “generally regarded as safe.”

…. In conclusion, we estimate that nasal iota-carrageenan may increase the recovery rate from the common cold by about 50% and shorten the duration of long colds by about 30%. We did not find a beneficial effect on short colds. If able to be replicated, the findings of this study are important for future treatment options for coronavirus and influenza virus infections. Further research should be carried out to examine the effects of nasal iota-carrageenan on respiratory virus infections in more detail.

This preprint, “Efficacy of a nasal spray containing Iota-Carrageenan in the prophylaxis of COVID19 in hospital personnel dedicated to patients care with COVID-19 disease” (April 15, 2021), is less equivocal:

Iota-Carrageenan (I-C) is a sulfate polysaccharide synthesized by red algae, with demonstrated antiviral activity and clinical efficacy as nasal spray in the treatment of common cold. In vitro, I-C inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infection in cell culture…. I-C showed significant efficacy in preventing SARS-Cov-2 infection in hospital personnel dedicated to care patients with COVID-19 disease….

(Betadine stans know that the throat spray contains povidone-iodine. Disappointingly, the nasal spray. also branded Betadine, does not. It does, however, contain carrageenan (!).)


First, from ENA in Australia, a drug called INNA-051:

University of Newcastle Associate Professor Nathan Bartlett is working with the drug development company ENA Respiratory, and has played a key role in the research leading up to the human trials.

Associate Professor Bartlett said it worked by activating an immune response in the upper respiratory tract.

He said the drug, INNA-051, was shown to be effective both before and after early exposure to the virus that caused COVID-19.

“It very rapidly provides protection right where you need it, so it regulates the immune protection that exists there,” he said.

“We were researching INNA-051 prior to the pandemic and discovered that it was very effective at priming the airways to more rapidly and effectively respond to a viral infection,” he said.

Second, in Austria, Marinomed Biotech has commercialized a carrageenan-based nasal spray:

The Carragelose nasal spray is a particular subtype of large molecules derived from carrageenan – a type of seaweed – and is a broadly active, unspecific molecule that traps respiratory viruses, including SARS-CoV-2.

Dr Prieschl-Grassauer explains: “It prevents their attachment to surfaces including cell surfaces, so it appears respiratory viruses have something in common because they need to attach to the mucosal cells to get the infection running.

“They have a positive charge on the surface and Carragelose is negatively charged because it contains sulphate groups and, therefore, you have an unspecific interaction. This prevents the attachment of the virus to the cell. If it cannot attach, it cannot go into the cell, and if it cannot go into the cell, it cannot replicate so, this is the mechanism.

“We needed a virus group that could be treated topically – intranasally – because then you can reach them before the enter the system. So, we switched from the more life-threatening infections like HIV to viruses like common cold, and have developed a nasal spray very fast.

“In total, we have conducted three clinical trials with the nasal spray to show that we can translate from in vitro data via in vivo data to a clinical outcome.”Dr Prieschl-Grassauer said: “Carragelose has been tested on the three variants which are B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and the P1 variant. The data demonstrate that, with increasing prevalence of virus variants, the marketed OTC Carragelose-based lozenges, nasal, and throat sprays will continue to effectively contribute to combatting the COVID-19 pandemic.

“The treatment is not something which is comparable to vaccination because we have to use it steadily, whereas with vaccination you get it once or twice depending on the treatment schedule.

“On the other hand, the advantage is that you can use it as early as you feel you have come into contact with persons you feel might be spreading a virus.

Third, we have a product (Bentrio) launched in Germany by Auris Medical, and a preprint. Preprint first: “Drug-free nasal spray as a barrier against SARS-CoV-2 infection: safety and efficacy in human nasal airway epithelia“, from the Abstract:

For SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses, the nasal epithelium is a key portal for infection. Therefore, the nose is an important target of prophylactic and therapeutic interventions against these viruses. We developed a nasal spray (AM-301, a medical device marketed as Bentrio) to protect against infection by SARS-CoV-2 and potentially other viruses

AM-301 did not have any detrimental effect on the nasal epithelium. Prophylactic treatment with AM-301 reduced viral titer significantly vs. controls over 4 days, reaching a maximum reduction of 99%. When treatment with AM-301 was started 24 or 30 h after infection, epithelia that received the formulation had a 12- or 14-fold lower titer than controls.

AM-301 was found to be safe in vitro, and it significantly decelerated viral titer growth in experimental models of prophylaxis and mitigation. Its physical (non-pharmaceutical) mechanism of action, safety and efficacy pave the way for further investigation of its possible use against a broad spectrum of viruses, allergens and pollutants.

And the mechanism of action for bentonite:

Other natural substances [besides carrageenan] with broad pharmaceutical applications and virus-capturing properties are clays, including bentonite. Bentonite is a clay mineral composed of thin aluminum silicate sheets with a net negative charge; these properties contribute to its ability to adsorb viral particles and molecules such as drugs. We therefore hypothesized that a bentonite-containing nasal spray could protect against SARS-CoV-2 and other airborne pathogens. Bentonite suspensions can have thixotropicproperties, that is, they reversibly change from a gel when undisturbed to a fluid colloid when agitated. We envisioned a bentonite-containing nasal spray that could be applied as a liquid, but in the nasal cavity it would form a durable, protective gel barrier.

While Auris is definitely talking its book (the press release announcing the study comes from… Bermuda), any amateur winemaker who has used bentonite as a clarifier will find the story plausible. (Note: There are other nasal sprays that contain Bentonite, though I can’t speak to formulation, efficacy, etc.)

Human nature being what it is, nasal sprays can be easily repurposed by fraudsters, since they are sold over the counter:

None of these three have any of the ingredients discussed here.


Basically, I’m chuffed that there’s a lot of research being done on nasal sprays. I find the final, prophylaxis, use case especially intriguing, because I would like to be able to give myself a protective spritz before entering an indoor space, and on exit as well. That’s something that vaccinations just can’t do.

Further, nasal sprays don’t need a cold chain or needles. That makes them ideal, whether for vaccination, treatment, or prophylaxis, in the poor countries who will surely still be suffering the consequences of the First World’s greed and inhumanity a year from now. So I wish all these efforts, even the ones talking their books, every success.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
This entry was posted in Globalization, Guest Post, Health care, Pandemic on by .

About Lambert Strether

Readers, I have had a correspondent characterize my views as realistic cynical. Let me briefly explain them. I believe in universal programs that provide concrete material benefits, especially to the working class. Medicare for All is the prime example, but tuition-free college and a Post Office Bank also fall under this heading. So do a Jobs Guarantee and a Debt Jubilee. Clearly, neither liberal Democrats nor conservative Republicans can deliver on such programs, because the two are different flavors of neoliberalism (“Because markets”). I don’t much care about the “ism” that delivers the benefits, although whichever one does have to put common humanity first, as opposed to markets. Could be a second FDR saving capitalism, democratic socialism leashing and collaring it, or communism razing it. I don’t much care, as long as the benefits are delivered. To me, the key issue — and this is why Medicare for All is always first with me — is the tens of thousands of excess “deaths from despair,” as described by the Case-Deaton study, and other recent studies. That enormous body count makes Medicare for All, at the very least, a moral and strategic imperative. And that level of suffering and organic damage makes the concerns of identity politics — even the worthy fight to help the refugees Bush, Obama, and Clinton’s wars created — bright shiny objects by comparison. Hence my frustration with the news flow — currently in my view the swirling intersection of two, separate Shock Doctrine campaigns, one by the Administration, and the other by out-of-power liberals and their allies in the State and in the press — a news flow that constantly forces me to focus on matters that I regard as of secondary importance to the excess deaths. What kind of political economy is it that halts or even reverses the increases in life expectancy that civilized societies have achieved? I am also very hopeful that the continuing destruction of both party establishments will open the space for voices supporting programs similar to those I have listed; let’s call such voices “the left.” Volatility creates opportunity, especially if the Democrat establishment, which puts markets first and opposes all such programs, isn’t allowed to get back into the saddle. Eyes on the prize! I love the tactical level, and secretly love even the horse race, since I’ve been blogging about it daily for fourteen years, but everything I write has this perspective at the back of it.


  1. Jeremy Grimm

    Why no mention of a simple Povidone spray or gargle?

    Thinking elliptically, how does the nasal sinus so effectively [I assume it is very effective] capture viruses and other intruders? How can such relatively large structures capture such small structures as viruses? … Now ask the same question about masks.

    1. Lambert Strether Post author

      > Why no mention of a simple Povidone spray or gargle?

      There is no mention of gargling because this is a post about sprays.

      If you read to the end of the piece you will find:

      (Betadine stans know that the throat spray contains povidone-iodine. Disappointingly, the nasal spray. also branded Betadine, does not. It does, however, contain carrageenan (!).)

      Frankly, Yves and I have both mentioned Betadine so much I didn’t consider it postworthy.

      1. Jeremy Grimm

        That you and Yves have mentioned Betadine so much is what made me curious why it had not received even a brief passing mention in your post.

        1. Drew458

          Povidone iodine (PVP-I) nasal spray is widely used in Asia, especially in Japan, usually as a 0.45% solution. A company called viraldine has 0.5% and 1.5% sprays on the market here. Australia has one in the works, patented, trialed, and waiting on an EUA for an entire year now. This is the Nasodine spray from Firebrick Pharmaceutical, a 0.5% PVP-I solution.

          There are loads of research papers and some news stories out there that the PVP-I spray kills this virus in as little as 15 seconds, with as low as a 0.5% solution. Yes, it works as a gargle or throat spray too. It stops the common cold, pnuemonia, takes out fungus, kill bacteria. Studies go back more than 20 years. (eg https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/kansenshogakuzasshi1970/73/5/73_5_429/_article) Few people seem to be aware of this.

          While Viraldine warns that topical PVP can be damaging in the nose, so they use only USP oral PVP, there is a 2018 recipe from NHS that adds 1/2tsp OTC PVP-I to a cup of water, a bit of salt and baking soda, and uses that as a nasal neti pot rinse. Comparing the ingredients of
          Betadine® Antiseptic Oral Rinse (which might only be sold to doctors?) to the OTC PVP-I made by Dynorex, the BAOR adds saccharin sodium and sodium hydroxide, while the Dynorex adds disodium phosphate, sodium cirate, and “tween 80” (which is polysorbate 80), all of which are common additives to packaged food. Sacchrin sodium is a sweetener, and sodium hydroxide is lye, used to adjust pH. So I’m guessing it’s hype from Viraldine.

          Actually, it’s rather astounding that so many studies show this method works amazingly well on this particular virus, that it can be used several times a day for weeks without problems, and most of this info is from a year ago … WTH has this not received insane amounts of media attention?? It can be used as a prophylaxis, as each treatment gives 3-4 hours of protection.

          My favorite paper is this one from some ENTs in Bangladesh, who diluted common 10%PVP to 0.6% and made it up by the gallon in soda bottles, poured it into plastic sprayers and gave it to hundreds of their patients as a nasal and throat spray. Great pictures. It worked. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8026810/

  2. Amfortas the hippie

    excellent, Lambert!
    and thanks.
    makes my mind wander around regarding the weird phenomenon of wife and both boys getting covid, and me not getting it from them.
    a main difference between them and me is that i smoke…both pot and cigarettes(i’m currently wearing my flame-proof bathrobe in case there are any tobacco teetotalers about.)…i remember reading something, early on in the pandemic, about the coating of “tar” and mucus in smokers’ lungs having a detrimental effect on the virus’ ability to attach…don’t remember details, and haven’t been able to find it again.
    there’s also the strange phenomenon of folks in my neck of the woods not taking the whole pandemic thing seriously, at all (“it ain’t real!!!”)…and yet our infection numbers never really got all that high(% of population-wise-i expected it to be much, much worse)…perhaps due to the widespread allergies around here…especially during fall and winter(“cedar fever”)…so i hypothesise that all that snot may be protective, as well.(with a caveat, with both boys, before they learned to cough productively, in order to “clear the lungs”, such allergies would often lead to upper respiratory infections and such…we always encouraged them to “spit that shit out”,lol.(and i didn’t smoke around them indoors)
    it is my understanding that this is, in fact, the purpose of snot…to carry out foreign bodies.

    and i agree that the prophylaxis things would be the coolest…a squirt before and after a trip to the grocery store….especially if the spray was cheap and OTC.
    i’ve been carrying around a little zicam(zinc and luffa sponge(!)) sprayer for just this reason, in case i get into a really crowded space, even with a mask….like the hardware store, where no one is masked at all, save me, and it’s cramped, what with the millions of things crammed in there.

      1. vao

        At least one of the much-touted studies about the supposedly protective effect of smoking against the coronavirus has been retracted — the authors had a long history of carrying out “research” paid by the tobacco industry.

        1. Amfortas the hippie

          not unexpected.
          and again, i don’t remember..year and a half ago.
          and i am in no way touting the inhalation of smoke as a preventative measure.

  3. Cuibono

    you could almost imagine the government announcing a major push to investigate approaches like this.

    then again

  4. Kristian

    Thank you for this very informative article. The nasal spray Xlear was not mentioned in this article and it goes under the preventative category. A search of “Xlear and Covid” will bring the science on this preventative spray that has been around for 20 plus years. I love it and have been using it for years. Makes me wonder if this is why I never get colds and to date no Covid (thankfully) and I am in health care and exposed to blood and saliva on a daily basis. I spray that Xlear before I go to work, at lunch and when I get home. Mucosal immunity/prevention is where it is at. If we don’t start going after mucosal immunity to end this thing we will be in it forever!!!!

    1. Kristian

      I absolutely love Xlear. Like the author, I am COMPLETELY baffled as to why more focus is not being made on mucosal preventatives/treatments/vaccines to control and hopefully end this pandemic. Israel has actually made the turn towards mucosal treatment/prevention this week so let’s see where that goes. Xlear has also done trials and currently they are conducting larger studies on how it affects Covid, so far with incredible results. I for one will never stop using it. This paired with a healthy lifestyle and immune boosting supplements has kept me Covid/sick free for some time now. I am thankful for this article opening my eyes to SO MANY mucosal preventatives/treatments for Covid.

  5. Basil Pesto

    Very handy summary, thanks Lambert! I may look into that Australian clinical trial.

    That’s very interesting about carrageenan as well. It is often used as a thickener by modern cooks.

    Is anyone in the commentariat able to speak to the impact, if any, on such interventions with regards to mutation/immune escape?

  6. Rob Dunford

    The nasal cavities do produce NO in very small quantities, quite naturally. If you breathe and hum at the same time, those cavities start producing more and more NO.
    This extra NO will produce vascular dilation in the lungs, I tested this with an oximeter. I got my bloodO2 % to 100% in minutes.

  7. PlutoniumKun

    Just on the point of carrageenan (the name means ‘little stone’ in Irish). Its a traditional folk cure for respiratory problems in parts of the west of Ireland. My mother used to collect it in the summer and dry it, and if I had a cold or asthma I was given a hot drink with the seaweed, sugar and a drop of poteen if it was available.

    Since I read last year that it had promise against coronaviruses I’ve wondered if the alcohol, when evaporating in the hot drink, acted as a transporter for the carrageenen to the nasal passages.

    1. Justin osullivan

      Carrageenan full of Iodine and trace minerals. Those druids knew what they were about.

  8. CoryP

    I know for a few years the nasal seasonal influenza vaccine (FluMist) was said to be less effective than the typical quadrivalent IM injections, by Canada/US health authorities. Though nasal was live-attenuated and injection was inactivated.

    I haven’t been able to tell if there is any argument for or against the particular route of administration in the case of the flu shot, or if they just think FluMist was a bad match for circulating strains in those years. Or if they observed a lack of efficacy but don’t have any idea why.

    I’m sure the answer is out there somewhere but I wonder if any of our medical/health types here know off the top of their heads?

  9. John Beech

    Using Studio 54 and coke as an entry into an article is an interesting approach!

    Anyway, I’m aware I may engage in behavior which is less than healthy so I’ve developed a simple solution of salt and povidone iodine (10% betadine). This, as used to disinfect pre-surgery. It’s mixed in water with salt and used to rinse my nasal cavities.

    3 tablespoons of non-iodine salt
    20cc of betadine
    2 liters of water

    I hork out my nasal cavities with this solution following my return from one of the machine shops (where some of the men resist vaccination), or the shipping center (same reason, some resist vaccinations), and whenever I must physically enter a store like Walmart (because I may encounter an unmasked somebody within an aisle).

    Basically any time I fear I may have been too close for comfort to anybody, I perform a prophylactic lavage of the nasal cavities. Especially after a doctor’s appointment because I’m sharing a waiting room with sick people (everyone is masked, but still). Also, and in particular, because they still like send in an aid to take my weight, blood pressure, ox level, and pulse (using cheapo pharmacy equipment like I have at home, and which I could use myself and record result). I detest being forced to endure exposure to another person within a tiny enclosed space even for 5 minutes! Tolerate the doctor because I have no choice, but I seriously resent the aid being in there with me when I could record the readings myself.

    Anyway, I use a 500ml nasal lavage squeeze bottle (purchased off Amazon for maybe $10) and fill it about half-way (unless I am really concerned when I use the whole load). Do it over the kitchen sink where there’s no fuss and no muss because I believe it may help keep me from becoming infected.

  10. Brittany

    Also, I’d like to add that we should also consider the method for holding the nasal spray. Here’s a study looking at the nasal spray position, and how it can impact delivery of the fluid to the “target” sites in the nose.

    1. Lambert Strether Post author

      > we should also consider the method for holding the nasal spray.

      Thanks for the link!

      Adding, I skimmed it. I don’t see a diagram that explains what I should do. Is it Figure 6?

      1. Brittany

        Yes, it’s figure 6e in that study.

        A presentation by the same researchers has a better figure located in this presentation at around 6 minutes into the video.

      2. Count Zero

        Yes I looked through the paper to see if I could find any useful information. It was very unhelpful and clearly not written for anybody but a tiny specialist audience of researchers in a very narrow field. Is it too much to ask that practical conclusions could be written in a few sentences of clear prose?

  11. Kristian

    I absolutely love Xlear. Like the author, I am COMPLETELY baffled as to why more focus is not being made on mucosal preventatives/treatments/vaccines to control and hopefully end this pandemic. Israel has actually made the turn towards mucosal treatment/prevention this week so let’s see where that goes. Xlear has also done trials and currently they are conducting larger studies on how it affects Covid, so far with incredible results. I for one will never stop using it. This paired with a healthy lifestyle and immune boosting supplements has kept me Covid/sick free for some time now. I am thankful for this article opening my eyes to SO MANY mucosal preventatives/treatments for Covid.

Comments are closed.