Yves here. The US has already gone into brownshirt terrain, with Congresscritters being roughed up and even arrested for excising their statutory right to visit ICE detainees and even merely attempt to query DHS chief Kristi Noem in person. One colleague in NYC who was an organizer of the protests there described long form how people no one recognized were trying to whip up the crowd to get violent and throw objects at the police. The organizers, mainly successfully, called on the protestors to stay peaceful. So we’ll see how the planned “No King” protests against Trump’s pretenses of royalty go in terms of numbers who participate and whether they can resist provocateurs.
Keep in mind that Trump is itching to invoke the Insurrection Act, so a big but peaceful show of numbers is required. But this Administration has gone so rogue that they may deem very large gatherings opposing Trump to be tantamount to an insurrection.
By Camillo “Mac” Bica, Ph.D., an author, activist, and Professor of Philosophy at the School of Visual Arts in New York City. Mac is former Marine Corps Officer, Vietnam Veteran, long time activist for peace and social justice and coordinator of Veterans For Peace Long Island. Contact him via https://www.camillobica.com. Originally published at Common Dreams
stopped reading after the enumeration of “megalomaniacal world leaders and dictators”
why even post something like this?!? smh
This is a manifestation of the cognitive bias called halo effect, of needing to see things as all good or all bad. If you expect perfection, you’l have to wait for the afterlife, charitably assuming you don’t wind up in Purgatory or worse or reincarnate.
I disagree. The point where an article compares Putin to Hitler is the point at which I too stop reading. Time is very precious, and there is no point wasting it. Whereas an article by Yves Smith will always be read in its entirety.
I felt the same when I saw Putin’s name. I think it is called carelessness with categories or dim bulb syndrome and, if this is now the standard of philosophy taught in the US, no wonder the country elects bums, stiffs and deadbeats like Clinton, the Shrub, Obama, Biden and Trump and it’s heading for a four front war (I tend to include the Arctic because of it’s increasing importance to Russia and China as a trade route).
No wonder indeed. Philosophy in US universities is mainly so-called analytic philosophy. The English novelist and philosopher Iris Murdoch summarized it well: analytic philosophy explores a world in which “people play cricket, cook cakes, make simple decisions, remember their childhood and go to the circus, not the world in which they commit sins, fall in love, say prayers or join the Communist Party.”
I would not single out those who study analytic philosophy, though, as probably a majority of the academics in USian higher education think along the same lines. Largely, they appear to be “good liberals” who lap up whatever the NYT says, and dutifully express aghastitude at all things Trump, always voting instead for Team Dem. They are too worried about tenure and career goals to really venture beyond that.
I inadvertently found myself in an analytic philosophy program in graduate school and would characterize the experience as an Anglo-American version of Sartre’s No Exit. Utterly sterile and lacking any relation to life as actually lived. After a year I transferred to the English department where I was free to read Althusser, Heidegger and Lacan in peace.
As soon as I saw Putin lumped in with Hitler, I didn’t see much point in reading further, though I did skim through to the end; Bica does mention that he fought in “America’s unnecessary and immoral wars,” which is something, but it’s simply a lie borne of ignorance (or likely successful propaganda) to say Putin is megalomaniacal and a dictator, and its historically false to put Hitler and Putin in the same category. I don’t care that it’s republished here; I’m not going to stop reading NC. Counterpunch, for example, routinely publishes things by the contemptible Bernie Sanders and others that I don’t bother to click on. Not that long ago, I read almost everything posted at CP. Then came what we might call the Age Of Trump, and it seemed to mark a turn of sorts, or maybe a hitting of the brakes. Much of the intellectual damage happened when way too many leftists got gulled by the Russiagate hoax (an attack on Trump from the right; typically, Trump thinks it was”leftists”), perhaps including Dr. Bica.
He fought in “America’s unnecessary and immoral wars,” and he can’t wait to fight more of those against Kim Jong Un, or Putin, or whoever the designated Hitler-of-the-day is. You can’t teach an old dog new tricks, because his Pavlovian reflexes are cemented.
I quit too at the same place for the same reason.
I believe the philosophy that leads to (irrelevant) insertions like these is ‘Cover Your Ass’. Nothing says ‘patriot’ like shi*ting on perceived enemies. This way, we can be sure the author is not a DPRK asset, and is merely upset about his burning house.
Yep. He could have easily left out that part. It is just one sentence. One sentence that sticks out a lot. It’s not a “dog whistle” but “let’s run it up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes it.”
Frankly, I am surprised Eve has reposted a piece of junk written by ignorant and butthurt US army vet and pseudo science phd cretin who compares nazi parades with the great patriotic war commemorations in Russia. As for North Korea, the N Koreans still remember how the many of you who “shed your blood and sanity for your country”, on their land, killing their people in the name of US supremacy. It is their message to you: “don’t fuck with us”.
Project much? You look to be the one “butthurt” over Yves not giving a trigger warning over some of the post’s content. Maybe she’s busy because a big war has started?
And maybe this vet has some PTSD over military displays generally?
So, you think that Vladimir Putin is basically just like Adolf Hitler? Not to mention Joseph Stalin, Kim Jong Un, or, God forbid, Ho Chi Minh. Or, maybe, you just think that Vietnamese-village-burners should be beyond any criticism, in order not to accidentally hurt their felings? They must have very hard time coping with feeling sad once in a while for the crimes they have gotten away with, while saving the humanity from megalomaniacal world leaders and dictators.
Match for that straw? reprobate said no such thing. Your attack on reporbate is unfounded.
Tatyana Kopyl was totally out of line in engaging in a personal, ad hom attack on the post author. And she also seems ignorant that we had something called a draft in the Vietnam war. 2.2 million men went because they didn’t come from rich enough families to get a college deferment.
reprobate’s rejoinder was narrow, arguing that if I had given my normal prophylactic warnings about sour notes in a piece that also makes some valid points (something I do regularly) that the level of bitching and moaning would have been vastly reduced. The fact that he depicted the issue as my not having called out the dodgy parts means that he did not dispute that some of the article was questionable.
So your comment is also a reading comprehension failure.
Yes, match for that straw, or fighting fire with fire. The one that is out of line here is the “philosophical marine”, and he deserves all the backlash (from Tatyana, and others). He pretends to be anti-war while pushing pro-war Putin-is-Hitler rhetoric. That is no bueno. Being-conscripted victim card does not work with me, because I have one too.
I have no problem with the choice of article at all. Intentionally posting flawed stuff keeps audience sharp, and is a common thing here. It also means that strong reactions should be expected (few posters above said that they stopped reading after that specific point), and I would be very dissappointed if they did not happen.
I don’t think Tatyana’s anger is directed toward you (and don’t think there is a need for counteroffensive), but towards “butthurt US army vet”. Reprobate attacking her (unnecessarily in my view, and starting with a petty insult), and trying to make “the professor” victim here is what I reacted to. The author is a part of the problem pretending to be a part of the solution. That is bad. That is something that triggers my PTSD, alongside those that “thank for their service”.
So your comment is also a reading comprehension failure, but nevermind that. I have no interest in picking up a fight, and not only because the author does not read the comment section here anyway. Peace.
This is yet more grounds-shifting. The issue was your misrepresentation of reprobate, who was, as I said, actually confirming that the article had issues by artfully saying a trigger warning by me was warranted.
You then try to accuse me of straw manning on fabricated grounds, by dragging in other topics which had nothing to do with my reprimand of you. You do not get to attack other readers by distorting what they said, attributing views they never voiced (and I personally know that they do not hold), and generally getting nasty.
So now you are engaging in even more violation of our Policies, which is behavior we see all the time when someone is losing an argument and are deeply invested in their beliefs. You won’t concede that you were off base in your attack on reprobate. Instead you attack me.
I trust you will find your happiness on the Internet elsewhere.
I am a little disappointed tbh as it indicates the commentariat is becoming reactionary; signs of the times, perhaps, but NC is about detailed, big picture media analysis, which involves listening to the rhetoric of people you disagree with, lest you wake up and find everyone around you was following along, while your ears were plugged.
What I see on display, is the common leftist demand for ideological purity, which winds up creating a politically toxic environment, arguably more unhealthy than the offense. Keep your eyeses on the prizes (of which the rehabilitation of Putin is not high on the list).
That said, I’m sure Yves is chastened, and ready to pander /sarc
Would that Trump end up on a rope bridge with Congress on one side and MAGA on the other. But if we are to be honest, it is not the first time that you have had military parades in DC-
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-military-parade-history-rare-last-military-parade/
But the problem here is intent. As the US Army, Navy & Marine Corps all have their birthday this year, he could have designated a day for this parade for all three services. Instead, I think that he went with the one that coincided with his birthday because his vanity won out. More to the point, this is part of his idea to rewrite history to say that American won WW2 (there will be a lot of WW2 gear on parade) and that America’s military is the greatest in the history of this world and nations should line up to buy their equipment now – financing available. Of course you have to wonder if this is just Trump being jealous how Macron gets the military parades for Bastille day but there is nothing like that for him – but which he intends to fix. Imperial presidents though have been a problem since the US was formed. Because of his haughty demeanor during George Washington’s Inauguration, some people quipped that perhaps America had exchanged George III for George I.
The Dems were perfectly happy with some of Biden’s authoritarian moves and as for the above, grouping Trump with a “dictator” like Putin, some of us say “if only!”
Our dilemma is that both sides are evil, greater or lesser. But at this point Trump definitely has earned the title of greater. Even the Dems and Biden weren’t stupid enough to start a war with Iran. Trump liked to call our ex gov Nikki Haley “birdbrain” but we might as well have had Haley as president since all of Trump’s moves are the ones that she advocated. True, Haley also liked to go on about dictator Putin and so far Trump hasn’t. But give him time.
A pundit elsewhere has written that it’s a good thing Trump is so incompetent because otherwise he might really become dictator. He’s losing the country and his own supporters, not gaining.
But the Dems and Biden were stupid enough to start a war with Russia. How well did that work out?
Oh I agree. But when it comes to blowback onto American voters Israel is the champ. Think 9/11, Arab oil boycott, Marines in Beirut, Iraq invasion, Afganistan tar baby. When Israel came into being Truman went against State Department advisors who said we need the Arabs on our side for the oil. The UK wanted a client to protect Suez and their access to India but that was not a US problem. FDR also advocated for a Jewish state at the Bitter Lake event but took no for an answer.
That’s all water under the bridge and the state of Israel does exist and will continue to do so if they ever make peace with the Middle East instead of trying to conquer it. Hubris precedes Nemesis.
As the Earth is the only planet not named for a god, and as Trump sees himself, at least as a demigod, I would expect at some point between now and 2029, that he insist the name be changed to planet Trump; enough with Romans and Greeks, it’s about time we had a planet named after an American god.
I have read that the military participants were carefully chosen, having been asked how they feel about Trump, and being given the option to join in or not. I suspect no one will be armed (except of course for the SS and some very, very carefully vetted cops). Our dimwitted Caesar will have his parade; it’s best to ignore it.
Does anyone know how the military participants of the big parade were “chosen”? Were they volunteers or drafted (ordered) to duty?
It looks like they pulled troops from units that participated in the various conflicts. I see that our 25th Inf Div is to represent Vietnam, but haven’t seen anything about specific units. They have been holding various ceremonies all week on their base (Schofield Barracks).
Putin megalomaniacal? How, exactly? Putin strikes me as capable, careful, conservative, a thinker who values history, accuracy, and detail, and not someone at the mercy of delusions of greatness.
Maybe he should have also added every French President since 1880 if military parades is his measuring stick-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bastille_Day_military_parade
You left out the most important attribute; Putin is a staunch Russian patriot. Americans don’t normally view foreigners this way; that Putin might be willing to serve and die for his country is not part of the equation.
It is Trooping the Colour in the UK today to celebrate King Charles III official birthday.
Black armbands are being worn as a nod to the recent Indian jet crash. Pretty bizarre when you think about it. There were 172,000 road deaths in India in 2023 – so more die per day on their roads than in this 1 plane crash which also had no military based cause, so surely we should be constantly wearing black armbands?
Allegedly Labour and Reform are in bidding war with the armband supplier for red ones with an insignia on….. /sarc
Even more bizarre if you consider all the Indian deaths caused by the British.
Again – when Finkelstein in February was musing about “fascism”/”no fascism” – he also mentioned the Supreme Court and suggested one would see what its limits of tolerance towards POTUS are. As a sign post of how far the system at large is willing to go.
I agree with that under the impression that that court by the US establishment at least in public is regarded a saint institution nobody can get by or touch (interestingly Taibbi/Kirn too as far as I followed them).
So the judges are the ones possibly drawing red lines. Or not drawing them. As institutional power goes.
As above is concerned – it is beyond me how a “Professor of Philosophy” can seriously produce lest publish such phrases:
“And what better to accomplish this than a parade to celebrate the military and the weapons of war, an event befitting other megalomaniacal world leaders and dictators like Kim Jong Un, Vladimir Putin, Joseph Stalin, and Adolf Hitler.”
Except Germany, Italy, Spain I believe there are not too many big countries with big militaries not doing military parades. French Rafales racing across the Champs Élysées?
But even without a serious reflection upon facts, whether one has a cause or not in his/her writings, to spread bullshit sentences like this isn´t any help.
One can include a lot of US presidents on that list, too.
There were military parades in the aftermath of the Civil War (I almost wonder if the unrepentent former Confederates said something similar to this professor with regards the army parade at Grant’s inaugurations.) There were many military parades after World War II: on Fourth of July, as part of presidential inaugurations, etc. It’s easy to find pictures of such parades on Google as long as you add “-Trump” in the search box. Let’s face it: people love military parades fwiw. Milking ludicrous implications that aren’t really there from all manner of stuff just erodes credibility of those who are doing that…but those who believe themselves to be the self-evidently righteous never seem to learn this. (TBF, even George Orwell fell to this–2+2 = 4 and all that…)
While I do think Trump is taking things to far, I do have to wonder why in all the hand wringing over his actions, nobody ever mentions Obama assassinating US citizens, including a teenager, on his say so alone? Is that not about the pinnacle of authoritarianism? Obama joked about it all and barely anyone made a peep. Congress barely batted an eyelash, and certainly didn’t try to impeach him.
Do the people who write these types of articles ever stop to consider why Trump might get the impression everything he’s doing is OK? Or ask themselves why they didn’t protest so vehemently when Obama and many other presidents overstepped the limits?
Although I also think Obama should have faced more protest for his drone strikes, deportations, torture at Guantanamo, etc., it is simply wrong to claim that “no one ever mentions Obama assassinating US citizens” (everyone from Glenn Greenwald to Amy Goodman to Chris Hedges, Noam Chomsky, Cornel West, Medea Benjamin and many others criticized him for it at the time, and yes they were marginalized but some said so on mainstream television and radio). And while I agree that the author’s comparison with authoritarian dictators is overblown, let’s also not pretend it’s strange that a lot of people are disturbed by a president who threatens to annex Canada and Greenland and renames the Gulf of Mexico, pardoned January 6th insurrectionists, whose ICE is blatantly violating due process, snatching people up for writing op-eds critical of Israel, letting the world’s richest man slash cancer research and gut agencies regulating his companies while profiteering from federal contracts, etc. It is also hardly surprising that many people are annoyed by Trump wanting to do this on his birthday, and by his megalomaniacal narcissism in general.
You may have heard those criticisms at the time, and so did I. But most others did not, because as you noted, they were marginalized. Unless you were a news junkie who listened to non-corporate sources, you probably never heard of it. I recently brought it up with a group of very liberal, well educated professor types and got blank stares.
And I really feel that trying to turn a riot into an insurrection (I’ve been waiting for years now for someone to explain by what mechanism unarmed people delaying a procedural vote would transfer the presidency to Trump) has not helped at all. Like I said about past presidents’ overreach giving the current one ideas, if that January riot was an insurrection, then arguably so is what was happening in LA recently, which then justifies Trump’s actions to crack down (yes, justified using a rather novel interpretation of the laws, but then novel interpretations were routinely used against Trump). But they are not justified.
Many people also warned after the Patriot Act that the US’ practices in its foreign policy would eventually be turned against the American people. Slowly and across multiple administrations, it has been. Trump is a danger to be sure, but he is not an unprecedented one. He’s a continuation of the creeping authoritarian rot that’s been going on for a long time.
>>>I recently brought it up with a group of very liberal, well educated professor types and got blank stares.
Thank you for this comment. I recently brought this up to a former federal judge who promptly asked me where I got my information. I told her that I have many sources for information, and her response was that “it sounds like a conspiracy theory.” When I mentioned the details of the case, she at least had the grace to say I was right.
We agree on many of the continuities, but it’s utterly ludicrous to compare a Trump-incited mob storming and defacing the nation’s Capitol, forcing Congress to evacuate to disrupt an electoral certification, with what happened in L.A.
I marched in military parades on 5th Avenue in New York City in the early 1960s. I think they were on Armed Forces Day. What stands out in my mind is the effect of hot sun on a steel helmet. I just wanted it to end. My guess would be that the soldiers marching today will want the same.
It’s “his” birthday? It is the birthday of 1/365th of the human race. Happens every day. Nothing special. I have reached an age that the only remarkable thing about my birthday is that I am here to note it. He really should get over himself. Now that is a vain hope.
Given China/India etc it probably is close to 1/365 but perhaps not so in USA. Northern hemisphere nominally Christian countries have fairly uneven distribution of birthdays across the year.
People get more jiggly over that cold Xmas and New Year period so typically 9 months later…. ;)
/silly pedantry
I was born in late June on a hot and humid day. My parents got “jiggly” in late September, also likely a hot and humid day & night. :)
He’s seventy-nine. There’s no fixing his gargantuan ego and narcissism at this point.
By the way, approximately 300K folks young and old, straights and gays, from every corner of the globe showed up in San Francisco for the No Kings march and rally. It was very peaceful. The accompanying music was excellent. Even the police were kicking back leaning on their motorcycles.
So many people with no purpose.
Here’s to hoping the Democrats go the way of the Whigs.
You assume they were Democrats. There are more independents than Dems, and by a large margin. And even MAGA members are having buyer’s regret over Trump, with Tucker Carlson leading the charge with respect to warmongering.
I’ve kept this link for occasions such as this:
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/06/back-obama-the-cool-self-aware-irony-drenched-con-artist.html
Fool me once, …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hl7FKfl3O2Y