Even Libertarians and Austrian-School Economists Are Pillorying Javier Milei’s Economic Program

It makes a nice change to read scathing critiques of Milei’s disastrous economic program from the right as well as the left.

Argentina is scheduled to hold mid-term elections in a few weeks’ time, and Javier Milei’s government is once again in the spotlight for all the wrong reasons. As we reported a few weeks ago, the economy is back in crisis mode just months after receiving the first instalments of a $42 billion bailout package from the IMF, World Bank and Inter-American Development Bank — a bailout over which high-ranking IMF officials resigned or were fired for refusing to greenlight.

In July, the Argentine peso posted its worst month since Milei devalued it in December 2023. In recent days, JP Morgan Chase has cut its 2025 growth forecast for the Argentine economy for 2025 from 5.3% to 4.7%. That came on the heels of a slowdown in the second quarter of this year. The latest reports suggest that economic activity shrank in July (on a month-by month basis) for the fifth consecutive month.

Another Looming Default?

Ten days ago, the government tried to roll over bonds by offering investors what should have been a mouth watering 69% interest rate, yet only succeeded in rolling over 61% of them. As the Palestinian-Jordanian libertarian economist and prominent Bitcoin advocate Saifedean Ammous notes, the fact that “even a 69% annual interest rate isn’t enough to tempt investors to risk lending to the Milei ponzi… means they either expect a default very soon, or they expect price inflation to exceed 69% over the next year.”

If the peso continues to plunge, inflation could once against surge (it’s still at 36% annually). Meanwhile, unemployment is at a four-year high. Car sales continue to slide while industrial production shows no sign of recovering from Milei’s chainsaw austerity, with output levels at their lowest since 2007.

A new study by the Faculty of Economic Sciences of the University of Buenos Aires suggests Argentina has “lost its lure” among multinational companies and foreign investors. For all the promises of foreign money pouring into the country, the reality has been quite the opposite. Now that the government has lifted capital controls, at the IMF’s insistence, the money is flowing the other way.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, distrust in the government is on the rise, reports Perfíl. According to one survey, almost seven out of 10 (67%) Argentines say they do not believe that the government’s official inflation figures reflect their true cost of living.

Ripping Off the Disabled

That distrust is almost certain to have grown in recent days with the eruption of yet another sordid scandal involving senior Milei officials. Last week, audio recordings leaked to local media purporting to show Diego Spagnuolo, President Milei’s personal lawyer and the head of the country’s disability agency, describing a kickback scheme tied to government health contracts for the disabled that funnelled money to top officials, including Milei’s own sister, Karina.

Other alleged participants in the scheme include Eduardo and Martín Menem, two nephews of the former President Carlos Menem who both hold senior roles in Milei’s government. As readers may recall, Carlos Menem was the man whose neo-liberalisation of the Argentine economy and hairbrained one-to-one peg of the Argentine peso to the dollar helped pave the way for Argentina’s 2001 default and resulting IMF bailout.

That, in turn, set the stage for bank runs, the subsequent harsh restrictions placed on bank account withdrawals (in dollars) — the so-called “corralito” — and the inevitable devaluation that ended up wiping out the savings of millions of Argentines. Of course, before the restrictions came into effect, foreign investors, political insiders and Argentina’s business elite were tipped off, allowing them to get their money out of dodge.

It is not hard to see the same happening in the coming months, probably shortly after the mid-term elections. All the pieces are certainly in place. Once again, an IMF bailout will be used to subsidise capital flight so that Argentina’s wealthiest businesses and citizens can yank their money out of the country before the currency collapses — all on the government’s tab.

Readers may also recall that one of Milei’s campaign pledges was that he would do away with Argentina’s political caste, just as Trump pledged to drain the swamp in Washington. It would be the elite, Milei said, not ordinary working people, who would bear the brunt of the structural adjustments needed to transform Argentina into a viable, flourishing economy.

It was a lie, of course. Many of Argentina’s political elite ended up filling senior government roles in Milei’s government, including Luis Caputo, the former JP Morgan Chase banker who helped create the conditions for Argentina’s 2018 default.

As always, it is the poor and middle classes, particularly those of pension age, that have borne the brunt of the economic pain, all of it applauded by the IMF and Western media. It is the poor and middle classes who have seen their incomes frozen, their benefits squeezed, and their energy, transport and medical subsidies scrapped while inflation has continued to rage, albeit somewhat more quietly.

Making Out Like Bandits

Argentina’s financial elite and international financiers, by contrast, have made out like bandits. A year ago, Milei told a meeting of industrial lobbyists: “we shrank the state in order to fill your pockets”. Yet Argentina’s industry is also shrinking as a result of Milei’s austerity program, the real beneficiaries of which are the financial speculators who made bank on the peso-dollar carry trade facilitated by the policies of Economy Minister (and former JPM banker) Luis Caputo.

As happened in 2001 and 2018, the speculators are once again moving their money overseas before the trade collapses, all made possible, once again, by the IMF. Meanwhile, Milei’s sister — whom he refers to as “La Jefa” (The Boss) given she essentially manages his agenda and his finances — is allegedly feathering her nest with kickbacks alongside Menem’s nephews.

The company that is allegedly paying the kickbacks, Suizo Argentina, saw its contracts with the Milei government balloon by 2678% between 2024 and 2025 alone.

To make matters even more unsavoury, the recording was leaked just weeks after Milei vetoed three bills that would have increased pension and disability benefits. In other words, the government is robbing from the disabled while at the same time vetoing a law that would give the disabled extra funds at a time of endlessly surging prices.

Of course, this is not the first time Milei’s inner circle has been accused of taking bribes and kickbacks. Just five months ago, Milei promoted an unknown shit-coin called $LIBRA that rocketed in value after his endorsement and then quickly cratered. In both cases, Karina Milei appears to have played the role of bagwoman.

The difference this time round is that it is much easier for voters to understand the nature of the crime. Also, the victims are not crypto-freaks and Milei fanboys but hundreds of thousands of recipients of disability benefits. From Associated Press:

This latest firestorm saw Milei’s government dismiss Spagnuolo from his post Thursday over the released recordings in which he can be heard complaining about how pharmaceutical companies pay bribes to Karina Milei, the president’s chief of staff and top adviser, to secure government drug purchases for disabled people.

The date and location of the audio, recorded in secret, remain unclear. Only Spagnuolo’s voice can be heard over the low clatter of cutlery and coffee cups, suggesting the conversation was captured in a cafe or some other public place. The other interlocutors cannot be identified.

The government has not confirmed nor denied the authenticity of the recordings.

In the audio, Spagnuolo can be heard calling out the major pharmaceutical company Suizo Argentina as offering bribes to Karina Milei through her close confidant, Eduardo “Lule” Menem.

“They’re embezzling my agency. They’ve assigned a guy who handles everything related to my coffers,” the alleged voice of Spagnuolo says. “They’re going to ask people for money, the providers.”

At one point he appears to explain that the highest rungs of Argentina’s government have demanded 8% kickbacks from pharmaceutical companies.

“I estimate that Karina gets 3%,” Spagnuolo can be heard saying. “One percent goes to operations, another 1% goes to me. … Probably something like that and they’re screwing you big time.”

“No Crying in the Casino”

At the same time as this scandal grows, the Milei siblings also face the threat of lawsuits in three countries, Argentina, the United States and Spain, over the LIBRA meme-coin scandal. As Ammous notes, when the shitcoin he had promoted collapsed, “Milei had the audacity to go on TV and abdicate all responsibility for the losses” his followers had suffered, and “effectively told his countrymen: NO CRYING IN THE CASINO!”

In other words, they took their risks; now they have to face their losses. But there will be far more than tears when Milei’s economic experiment comes crashing down, Ammous warns:

When the ponzi collapses, as it always does, Argentines will have lost their cash savings, and most suckers who invest in bonds will have been ruined, but the fiat cartel banks will walk away well-fed, as they always do. Milei will discredit Austrian and libertarian ideas for decades to come by associating them with their diametrical opposites: inflation, indebtedness, bond market pump-and-dumps, and genocide. It is only his constant invocation of the Austrians that makes me take time from my busy schedule to discuss this con artist and his unfortunate country.

Despite — or perhaps more accurately, because of — his libertarian principles, Ammous has been a fierce critic of Milei’s economic policies ever since the moment the faux libertarian took office and reneged on his campaign pledge to shut down Argentina’s central bank. Instead, Ammous says, Milei went about attempting to save the central bank by piling its debt onto the government’s:

[Milei] reneged on his promise to fight inflation by doubling or tripling money supply measures; reneged on his promise to not raise taxes; sought an IMF bail-out; and hired the same JP Morgan bankers who had entrapped Argentina into tens of billions of dollars of debt to head the most important positions in his administration and central bank. Old habits die hard, and all of the free market bluster on the campaign trail gave way to the same old fiat banksterism.

It makes a nice change to read such a scathing critique of Milei’s disastrous economic program from the right as well as the left. But Ammous is not the only Austrian economist to have denounced Argentina’s self-ascribed libertarian president as a fugazi.

Milei’s “Love Affair With All the Institutions Responsible for Evil in the World”

In July, three members of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Ludwig von Mises Institute Germany resigned their seats after the Institute announced on its website that a “Memorial Prize in honour of Ludwig von Mises” would be created in October of this year and awarded to Milei.

One of the three economists, Hans-Hermann Hoppe, is a German paleolibertarian and anarcho-capitalist philosopher who teaches at the University of Nevada. In his earlier years he was a close collaborator of Murray Rothbard as well as a major inspiration for Milei’s economic ideas  — until Hoppe began criticising Milei’s policies as well as his unquestioning subservience to Washington and Israel. On one occasion, Hoppe said:

“There is a kind of love affair between Milei and all the institutions responsible for evil in the world. He loves the US government, which is the most imperialist, and he aligns himself with it.”

He also said:

“Libertarianism suddenly means being a fan of Netanyahu, a fan of the clown Zelenskyy, and a fan of Trump… That is not libertarianism, we oppose all of them.”

Following the resignation of Hoppe and his two colleagues, only two of the original five members remain on the Board. The three professors explained their decision to leave the board in a seething text that was published by the Mises Institute a few days ago. Here are the key parts (emphasis my own):

Neither the creation of the prize (which, incidentally, is the only prize ever awarded by MIG) nor the selection of the laureate were discussed in advance with the Institute’s Scientific Advisory Board. Not only is this bad style, it also gives the public the impression that these decisions have the backing of the Board. This is not the case…

It is true that [Milei] has made the names of Ludwig von Mises, Murray Rothbard and other thinkers of the Austrian School known to a wider public. But his knowledge of their ideas and theories is superficial and flawed, and his praise is therefore double-edged. In any case, we can only advise the public not to regard Milei’s statements on economic philosophy as authoritative

For one thing, Milei is at the beginning of his political career. The future success of his policies to date is highly questionable, and he may still take many wrong turns in the course of his term in office. No one knows how freedom-oriented they will ultimately prove to be. The assessment of his actions must be differentiated and open-ended. This simply cannot be done after twenty months in office…

[W]hatever successes his policies may have had so far have been largely achieved through the usual means of inflationary government financing, i.e. by inflating the money supply and government debt. It remains to be seen whether this strategy will succeed under Milei, given that it has repeatedly and for good reasons failed in Argentina and other countries in the past.

In addition, all the achievements of his political record to date are already offset by major liabilities: the political centralisation of the country, the expansion of the police state, the failure to implement the announced abolition of the central bank (one of the most popular points in his election programme), the haggling with the country’s traditional political elites, who also dominate his cabinet, and a foreign policy that is not geared towards international peace and is therefore not a libertarian policy.

Today, Javier Milei stands not only for inflation-financed radical economic policies with an uncertain outcome. He also stands for uncritical and downright enthusiastic solidarity with the current governments of the United States and Israel.

In our opinion, awarding Javier Milei a ‘Memorial Prize in Honour of Ludwig von Mises’ therefore has the potential to cause lasting and irreparable damage to the Ludwig von Mises Institute Germany, as well as to the Austrian School as a whole.

We cannot and will not take responsibility for this. We therefore declare our resignation from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Ludwig von Mises Institute Germany.

While hopefully more and more libertarians speak out against Milei’s policies, the reality on the ground is that public support for Milei, while lower than six months ago, remains stubbornly above the 40% mark. This, I believe, is largely a reflection of the public’s lingering dissatisfaction with Argentina’s traditional parties, which is fully merited.

But it also means that despite all the scandals, the worsening economic malaise, the IMF bailout, the crypto scam aimed squarely at Milei’s own followers, and the spectre of rising authoritarianism (Milei’s constant use of decrees and presidential vetoes, his escalating crackdowns on protests, his prohibition of medical marijuana, his plans to build Bukele-like mega-prisons and set up a pre-crime unit), a hard-core of Argentines will continue voting for Milei’s thinly veiled neoliberal project whatever he says or does.

At the same time, Milei’s party, La Libertad Advanca (Freedom Advances), is haemorrhaging support and allies in Congress, making it much more difficult for him to govern by decree and veto. And that is a small silver lining.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *