Greetings gentle reader, welcome to another installment of the Sunday Morning Movie. Today it’s a supernatural thriller, Necromancy, starring a corpulent Orson Welles.
Reviews:
Horror News says:
On the plus side Orson Welles is given some juicy monologues that offer a taste of his faded glory. Don’t forget, this was the man who terrified an entire nation with his War of the Worlds radio play and revolutionized filmmaking with Citizen Kane. His reward was having his reputation tarnished by a vengeful William Randolph Hearst (the real life Citizen Kane) and intense studio meddling on his later films. Welles was the Nicola Tesla of cinema— a man out of time, appreciated more after his death.
We also get a nice performance from Pamela Franklin. After her childhood debut in the classic ghost tale The Innocents (1961) Franklin became a horror film staple. Some of her genre highlights include And Soon the Darkness (1970) and The Legend of Hell House (1973). Necromancy includes her only onscreen nudity, so there’s some reason to endure the rest of the film. Franklin actually met her future husband Harvey Jason on this film, which according to her bio was “the only good that came from it.” But despite her dislike of Necromancy Franklin reunited with director Bert I. Gordon for his rampaging rodent romp Food of the Gods (1976).
Senseless Cinema says:
I must admit to an oversight here on Senseless Cinema, and that oversight is the lack of coverage of the truly excellent cinematic work of the famous director Bert I. Gordon. The oversight will now be corrected with a discussion of one of his finest works, 1972’s Necromancy (aka The Witching), starring Orson Welles.
As usual, not all of your universe’s critics recognize the quality of Mr. Gordon’s masterwork. For example, cfc_can writes that the director “seems to be deliberately trying to confuse the audience by using flashbacks and dream sequences.” Reviewer lucyskydiamonds writes, “This movie is so inherently awful it’s difficult to know what to criticise first.” And reviewer BaronBl00d writes, “This is not a good movie in any way under any name.” Needless to say, these three reviewers and countless others are misguided and incorrect, so let us proceed on a tour of the cinematic wonders of Bert I. Gordon’s Necromancy…
Letterboxd says:
I can say the stories not bad. I like it. It’s not the best story. It doesn’t even have the best acting in it. But with that said, I do think that the girlfriend is the most annoying character I’ve seen in a movie in quite some time. But then again I’ve seen so many ladies just like her. Aggressively annoying. Either way, I’m having one hell of a time just trying watching this. I put it on. That I feel myself wanting to go to sleep. I think iced tea has the reverse effect on me. Either way. I’ve had to get back several times and rewatch the same scene. Because I can’t remember how I got to the next one. I think this just scenes missing from this movie. Or there’s plot holes throughout the script. Like they went to the witches coven meeting. Then just went home I guess. So she could read the brimoire (sic). Then went to sleep. Woke up and saw the little boy. Then went looking for him and got locked out of the house. Where was the boyfriend? He wasn’t in the room while she was reading the book. He wasn’t in the bed with her while she was sleeping. Maybe they cut a scene where you said he had to go somewhere. Maybe this was all a dream. I don’t know. I’m having trouble following the flow of the story. I’m trying to watch this as just stuff happening. But I keep noticing random things like that. So apparently she’s supposed to sacrifice her life for Orson Welles’s son. Well that doesn’t really make any sense. As in his son been dead for a while. So you’re going to bring the rotting corpse of your son back to life? I could see if he just died. I don’t know.
My take:
A fun little movie if you don’t take it too seriously. It was horribly edited and jumps from scenario to scenario without warning. Orson Welles does a good job as the coven leader but his is the zenith of the acting you’ll find in it. It’s definitely not scary. I’m glad I watched it but that will be the only time I do.
Director: Bert I. Gordon
Writer: Bert I. Gordon, Gail March
Notable actors: Orson Welles, Pamela Franklin
Plot (Spoilers!):
Lori Brandon, trying to recover from a stillbirth, is preparing to move to California with her husband Frank. He has just landed a job at a toy factory there. On their way to the town of Lilith, they almost run head-on into an oncoming car that swerves away at the last second and runs off a cliff. Per standard movie protocol, the car explodes. Lori runs to the crash only to find a strange doll that has been flung from the car. They will learn later that the driver of the car was attempting to escape Lilith.
Driving off, they soon run out of gas and her husband has to walk to town for fuel. As she waits, she wanders to a hilltop where she has a vision of a strange funeral. Frank returns and they continue on their way.
When they get to Lilith, the pair have dinner with Frank’s new boss Mr. Cato (Welles). Mr. Cato explains that Frank will be working at his toy company. He also gives Lori a present, a witch’s grimoire.
Lori senses there is something strange about this town and her suspicions are soon confirmed when she learns that Mr. Cato and his employees, who are also the town’s inhabitants, are all witches. Mr. Cato explains to her that he seeks the power of necromancy in order to raise his dead son. She will play a crucial role in this.
The witches attempt to get Lori and Frank to join their coven. Lori refuses. She has also been seeing an apparition of a young boy around town and in her home. She is terrified and wants to get the hell out of Lilith.
One of the town’s women calls Lori and tells her she wants to leave Lilith with her. When Lori arrives at their rendezvous spot, she finds the woman dead in a creek. Then the hallucinations begin, culminating in her at the strange funeral being lowered into the grave in place of the revivified boy.
Suddenly Lori wakes up in her own bed, in the home they lived in before they moved to Lilith. She is screaming in fear. Frank comforts her but as they prepare to leave for Lilith a phone call makes her realize her nightmare is actually going to take place.
Pauline Kael’s long ago sixties essay on Welles.
https://newrepublic.com/article/89426/tnr-film-classics-falstaff-june-24-1967
It’s a bit of a gush and she would later have a falling out with Welles after her Citizen Kane Book made disputed claims about his contribution to Citizen Kane.
But surely she is right that some actors have the ability to command our attention almost effortlessly–unique and larger than life. One might also argue that the actors are the only thing that redeem many modern movies where the haphazard stories are uninspired. Not having see Necromancy I can’t speak to whether Orson does so there.
Welles definitely stands out in today’s film, the other actors are competent but Welles is obviously head and shoulders above them.
Both shlock director Bert I. Gordon and the great Welles were from Kenosha, Wisconsin. I’m thinking they must have at least bonded around that, and Welles had a heck of a sense of humor. I saw this in the 70s at a drive-in along with Food of the Gods, which actually had some scares, despite being generally awful. The 41 drive-in program director must have been a B-movie aficionado, because I don’t think anyone in that audience knew that both films had the same director.
Maybe they bonded and that’s how Welles wound up in his movie.
Kael makes much of Welles acting career in schlock and others as a way of making money to finance his own films. Maybe not true here?
And there may be more than she concedes to the Charles Higham character flaw view of Welles. “Genius” can be a hard thing to live up to…excuses may tempt. It’s not unusual for artists in general to flame out after early success–perhaps the more brilliant the more likely this is.
Orson plays a splandid Mexican general in the Italian Western Tepepa (aka Blood and Guns) – a film which features in none of his biographies, not enen Higham’s.
Thank you, too, Semper, for last week’s film The Island. Beautiful and memorable.
You’re welcome AC. Did you catch in last week’s film that the coal the protagonist was shoveling from the barge on which he committed his sin? He was living with the scene of his crime, digging into it every day. It just occurred to me the other day.
And you can see it on YouTube. I never heard of Tepepa, but I guess I will be watching it tonight.
Sometimes you just have to disengage the mind and sit down with a drink and popcorn and enjoy a mindless “guilty pleasure” film. “The Ninth Gate” this is not, but it inhabits the same genre.
Gordon was the perfect source for “bread and circuses” type entertainments.
Stay safe.
That was the goal of this particular film. It is a fun watch as I noted in my post but definitely not high cinema. I do like the The Ninth Gate but it’s not free on YouTube. I’ll look around but it probably comes with commercials and I’m trying to avoid that. Nothing ruins a movie like a fu(king car ad…
One reason I no longer go to “proper” theatres for films is the endless prologue of commercials. I pay to watch a film, not a bunch of lying commercial propaganda. Then there is that Coronavirus lurking in the wings. At least I can enjoy the show and my drink and popcorn at home without worrying about catching anything.
I happened to find a good copy of “The Ninth Gate” on DVD at a local thrift store several years ago.
A lot of my cinema acquisitions happen by happenstance. Go figure.
I miss the video stores of yore. I used to spend a solid hour going through the stacks in this place in Philadelphia. The staff were all film students and the mix was -eclectic- to say the least. Now it’s all streaming bull$hit, some with commercials even though you pay. YouTube is alright but they actually once let me watch half a movie and then tried to charge me to finish it. Fortunately it was The Commitments, one of the worst movies ever made, so I wasn’t too disappointed.
Ouch! “The Commitments!” I found that in a thrift store and couldn’t finish watching it. Luckily, I had a copy of “The Aristocrats” sitting by and soon comity and vulgarity were restored to their proper balance.
Don’t get me started on YouTube. To my way of thinking, “Culture Vultures” best describes that organization.
I remember when the Blockbuster chain was breaking. A regional salvage store chain had tons of ex-Blockbuster DVDs in well nigh endless rows in those thin paper sleeves. Unfortunately, the salvage chain managed to have it so that you could never find the entirety of a television series in one store. You had to search in several stores, usually sited about twenty or thirty miles apart out here in the sticks, to get full series episode sets. Ah! The joys of consumerism!
Stay safe!
9th Gate is great so I’ll check this movie out later.