This is Naked Capitalism fundraising week. 1350 donors have already invested in our efforts to combat corruption and predatory conduct, particularly in the financial realm. Please join us and participate via our donation page, which shows how to give via check, credit card, debit card, PayPal, Clover, or Wise. Read about why we’re doing this fundraiser,what we’ve accomplished in the last year, and our current goal, original reporting
Yves here. As many know or soon will know, the winner of the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize will be announced on Friday. Trump’s embarrassing personal lobbying for it alone should be disqualifying. The article below lists some concrete grounds as to why the Nobel committee should reject Trump’s entreaties. It is disappointing that the article does not address how Trump’s particularly claims regarding achieving particular peace settlement are false or at best, grossly exaggerated. For instance, Trump did not negotiate the de-escalation between Pakistan and India over their recent attacks on each other; Modi was allegedly infuriated by Trump trying to take credit. Similarly, as any reader of the press in Suotheast Asia will know, peace has not been achieved between Thailand and Cambodia. Skirmishes continue, the underlying dispute is unresolved, and the US is not in the picture.
And let’s not get started on Trump actively supporting Israel’s genocide in Gaza. It is truly sick that it was Netanyahu who nominated Trump for the Peace Prize. The fact that Trump could not find a more legitimate advocate speaks volumes.
So if Trump manages to win, the bestowing of the award would not be a testament to his peacemaking but to his power, specifically EU members pressuring the committee to give Trump the prize so as to curry favor because Putin. And as many, including members of the commentariat, have observed, if Trump wins, it will complete the discrediting of the peace prize that started when Obama was the pick.
My vote goes to the members of the Sumud flotilla.
We’ll provide some updates after the announcement.
Update: 8:30AM EDT. MSM schadenfreude:
Trump loses Nobel Peace Prize he shamelessly campaigned for https://t.co/b4kJB9qb1n
— TIME (@TIME) October 10, 2025
And substantive takes:
Why give the Nobel Peace Prize to an opposition leader who applauds US pressure against her country when the US Navy is preparing for an attack on Venezuela?
– Is the logic that democracy delivers peace, and the US military delivers democracy through war? pic.twitter.com/6q1cUHtxFT— Glenn Diesen (@Glenn_Diesen) October 10, 2025
What has Maria Corina Machado done to deserve the Nobel Peace Prize?
She’s accepted US taxpayer money to fund anti-gov’t NGOs, plotted coups, and agitated for direct military intervention in Venezuela to achieve regime change.
Does the Nobel Committee have any legitimacy? https://t.co/uOWxwnQtR2 pic.twitter.com/qr7k5yk2Bn
— Anya Parampil (@anyaparampil) October 10, 2025
Venezuela’s🇻🇪 election loser Maria Corina Machado has won the Nobel Peace Prize:
‘If we win, we will move the Venezuelan embassy to Jerusalem to support Israel.’
Like many other US-backed Latin American politicians, her policies are copy & paste support for Israel, support for… pic.twitter.com/0UXBVIhIhe
— Afshin Rattansi (@afshinrattansi) October 10, 2025
By Clarence Lusane. Originally published at TomDispatch
Who doesn’t know that President Donald Trump desperately wants a Nobel Peace Prize and said bitterly, “They will never give me a Nobel Peace Prize. It’s too bad. I deserve it, but they will never give it to me”?
And for once, he’s right. He won’t get one, but wrong, of course, that he deserves it. Actually, there are way more than 10 reasons why he doesn’t deserve such a prize, but as 10 is such a nice round number, let me use it.
As a political scientist who focuses on human rights, global racial justice, and social movements, I’ve given considerable thought to and conducted research on the Nobel Peace Prize. I once taught a course on the history and politics of that prize while a faculty member at American University’s School of International Service. Last year, I even spent time in Oslo at both the Nobel Peace Center museum and the Norwegian Nobel Institute, which houses many of the Nobel Peace Prize Committee’s documents, including, for example, original nomination letters that can be viewed and studied.
I was there doing research on the 1964 prize awarded to Martin Luther King Jr., and I read several of the original letters sent to the Committee nominating him. His main nomination came from the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC), which sent a letter dated January 31, 1963, that arrived after the January deadline for that year. His nomination was, however, carried over to 1964 and then he won.
As it turns out, I fall into one of the categories of those who can officially make such a nomination. They include members of “parliamentary assemblies” (or the U.S. Congress), previous Nobel Peace Prize Laureates like 17-year-old Malala Yousafzai or former Vice President Al Gore, directors of peace research institutes and foreign policy institutes, members of international courts, members of the Norwegian Nobel Peace Prize Committee, and (relevant to me) university professors.
Although the Committee has never explicitly stated that such a thing is possible, I’m going to assume that I can also make an “un-nomination.” In fact, believe it or not, while there were many letters of support for Dr. King’s nomination, there were also letters asking the Committee to deny him the prize, even if most of them came from individuals ineligible to make (or unmake) a nomination.
And let me just say: I can think of no one more deserving of being un-nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize than President Donald Trump. His record of authoritarian and antidemocratic rule grows more dangerous and harmful by the day, not just for the United States but for the entire global community. And yet he has indeed been nominated by Republican sycophants in Congress who seek his favor, and global strongmen, including Gabon’s President Brice Oligui Nguema, who came to power thanks to a military coup, and Azerbaijan’s Ilham Aliyev, who has been that country’s president for 22 years. They all understand that such recommendations appeal to his need for adulation and blunt any criticisms he may have of their own behavior.
The Nobel Committee does not, in fact, release information about each year’s determination, including all the individuals or groups nominated, until 50 years later, so the only way Trump and the world would know that Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet, and others have indeed nominated him is if they publicly stated it or told him so.
Autocracy, Racism, and Lawlessness Are Not Qualifications
The award normally focuses on a nominee’s work in the previous year, which means Trump’s “peace” efforts during his first term and his time out of office won’t be considered for next year’s award. So, let’s examine his first eight months in office in 2025 and ask a basic question: What has Trump done so far this year to not deserve the award?
First, within hours of being back in office, the “peace” president pardoned and commuted the prison sentences of 1,500 insurrectionists who had rioted on his behalf on January 6, 2021. (Actually, those are 1,500 reasons for no Nobel Peace Prize right there!) Hundreds of those individuals violently attacked police officers with the goal of stopping the peaceful transfer of power to the legitimately elected Joe Biden. Rather than condemn their actions, Trump rewarded their (and his) lawlessness.
Second, in his immoral and racialized campaign against undocumented immigrants who, he claims, are “poisoning the blood of the country,” his administration has unlawfully kidnapped individuals off American streets and renditioned them to horrific gulags in El Salvador and elsewhere. Some had committed no crimes and were legally in the United States or even U.S. citizens.
Third, he shut down the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). That agency, founded in 1961, had spent decades providing humanitarian assistance to millions of people around the world. As Oxfam noted, with the elimination of USAID, “At least 23 million children stand to lose access to education, and as many as 95 million people would lose access to basic healthcare, potentially leading to more than 3 million preventable deaths per year.”
Fourth, he has deployed staff from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), as well as the National Guard and other troops in Los Angeles, Washington, D. C., Chicago, and soon, it seems, to Memphis, Tennessee, and Portland, Oregon (supposedly to protect Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities there “under siege from attack by Antifa, and other domestic terrorists”). In Los Angeles, he claimed that the city was also “under siege” by people protesting his immigration raids. In fact, it was the inhumane and violent actions of ICE under Trump’s orders that sparked resistance in Los Angeles. In Washington, he falsely and repeatedly stated that he was sending in troops to control widespread crime. That canard was cover for him to spread his anti-immigrant campaign to another “sanctuary city,” and to target the most vulnerable people there like the unhoused and scooter delivery riders. (A Washington judge did at least recently block him from speedy deportations of undocumented immigrants.)
Fifth, signaling his desire for a new imperialist era, he threatened to seize Canada, Greenland, and the Panama Canal. CNN identified at least nine lies of his as to why Canada should become this country’s 51st state, including that its citizens like the idea (they don’t); that it doesn’t allow U.S. banks to operate there (it does); and that it doesn’t “take” U.S. agricultural products (it’s second only to Mexico in purchasing such products). Trump not only declared that he wanted Greenland for “security” purposes but didn’t rule out using military force to get it. Mind you, Greenland is a self-governing territory of Denmark whose people and government have no interest whatsoever in becoming part of the U.S. Though built by the United States, the Panama Canal was ceded to Panama in a 1977 treaty signed by President Jimmy Carter and ratified by the Senate. Trump claims that the United States is not getting fair market treatment for its use. However, as one expert on the canal noted, Trump is insisting on preferential treatment and promising to take it back if he doesn’t get his way.
Sixth, in a brazen abuse of power, he demanded that Brazil stop the prosecution of his ally there, former President Jair Bolsonaro. Like Trump in 2021, Bolsonaro and his followers were unsuccessful in their violent attempt to stop a transition of power to then-elected President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva after Bolsonaro legitimately lost the 2022 election. Trump has called the trial a “witch hunt” and said he would impose a 50% tariff on Brazilian imports unless it was stopped and Bolsonaro freed.
Seventh, in another of his unconstitutional executive orders, he threatened two U.S. professors with legal penalties for working with or writing in support of the International Criminal Court (ICC). The ICC (of which the United States is not a member) prosecutes war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide, all of which have no statutes of limitation. Trump was rebuffed by two federal judges who concluded that he was violating the First Amendment right to free speech by stating that he would “impose tangible and significant consequences” on anyone supporting the ICC. It has evidently particularly upset him that the ICC has issued an arrest warrant for his partner in crime in the war on Gaza, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. About a dozen countries have stated that they would honor the warrant.
Eighth, Trump’s June bombing of three nuclear sites in Iran took place under distinctly dubious legal authority. That both lawmakers and scholars can’t even agree on whether the president flaunted the law or not suggests the carelessness of his actions when it came to legal procedures involving war. And despite Trump’s boast that he “completely and fully obliterated” Iran’s nuclear program, reports from his own intelligence agencies suggest that the program was set back only a few months. Apparently embarrassed by the truth, War Department Secretary Pete Hegseth fired Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse, who headed the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency that reported on the botched airstrikes.
Ninth, he withdrew the United States from critical international bodies, including the World Health Organization and UNESCO, as well as less well-known organizations like the Council of Europe’s European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) that works with 46 European governments and civil society organizations across the region to address issues of discrimination. I admit that the last one is a bit personal for me. From 2022 to 2025, I was the U.S.-appointed “independent expert” to that very commission and attended its meetings in Strasbourg, France. My appointment was approved by then-Secretary of State Antony Blinken and the Council of Europe. In January, I was informed that Trump was withdrawing the U.S. from its “observer” status on the commission because ECRI was not aligned with the values of the incoming administration. Sadly, that part was all too true.
Tenth, he is complicit in the genocide and famine taking place in Gaza. While his claims of ending seven wars are dubious at best, in the one conflict where he could most decisively have intervened to bring closure to it, he’s done anything but. His unholy alliance with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has meant a lot of performative concern about starvation and the tens of thousands of deaths in Gaza along with an unending supply of weapons for Israel. His insensitivity to the suffering of the people in Gaza has only been compounded by his disturbing desire to cleanse the area of Palestinians and develop what he’s called a “Riviera of the Middle East” there.
And mind you, I won’t even count President Trump’s “pathetic” groveling campaign for the Nobel Peace Prize as one of the reasons he shouldn’t get it. That seems almost self-evident. It reminds me of comedian Steven Wright’s joke: “I’d kill for a Nobel Peace Prize.” It’s impossible to imagine Nelson Mandela, Jimmy Carter, or Martin Luther King Jr. calling officials in Norway and begging for the prize as Trump recently did; or, for that matter, using his platform at the United Nations to falsely claim that “everyone says I should get the Nobel Peace Prize.” And mind you, that ludicrous claim came only weeks after his unlawful killing of multiple individuals with military strikes in the international waters of the Caribbean without due process or any legal recourse, not to speak of changing the name of the Department of Defense to the Department of War. “Everyone,” of course, meant almost nobody. A Washington Post-Ipsos poll found that 76% of Americans don’t believe that he deserves the award, including 49% of Republicans.
It’s inexplicable to me why former Secretary of State Hilary Clinton would cavalierly state that she would nominate Trump, the twice-impeached, 34-count convicted felon and adjudicated sexual abuser, for the prize if he brought a ceasefire to the war in Ukraine. By now, it should be crystal clear that Trump has no interest in Ukraine’s sovereignty, which he’s denigrated repeatedly, while proving all too willing to grant concessions to the universally recognized aggressor in that conflict, Russian President Vladimir Putin. But even if he did help broker a fair peace agreement, which the entire world (except Putin) wants as soon as possible, that shouldn’t excuse his broader autocratic behavior and agenda.
Note to Trump: The Award Must Be Earned
His authoritarian push to reshape the United States and demean all its governing, social, financial, and cultural institutions is itself a threat to peace. He continues to attack a free press, bully universities, ignore judicial orders, abuse the very principle of a separation of powers, and openly seeks to rig elections in his favor. Forget for the moment the fascism, authoritarianism, patrimonialism, retribution, bigotry, corruption, greed, mendacity, and incompetence — his one character trait that should be considered most disqualifying is his cruelty. His lust for revenge and power has brought unspeakable malice and pain to undocumented immigrants, LGBTQ families, federal workers, foreign students, and any number of individuals whom he feels have challenged him.
Trump is possibly the most unethical, petty, and vengeful president in American history. Compassion and empathy simply play no role in his character or makeup. After all, at the memorial for the assassinated Charlie Kirk, moments after his widow Erika Kirk called for forgiveness and stated that “the answer to hate is not hate,” Trump said, “I hate my opponent, and I don’t want the best for them.”
The Nobel Peace Prize is awarded to “the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” He meets none of those criteria.
Let Trump continue to whine and play the victim as he manifests his doctrine of intimidation, bribes, and palling around with authoritarians. In the not-too-distant future, history will extensively document and abhor the outrages and inhumanity of the Trump era, recording it with the same disdain and dismay that now is used for the eras of slavery and segregation, or the McCarthy years. Let’s hope that the Nobel Peace Prize never becomes another institution that Trump disgraces and diminishes.
Copyright 2025 Clarence Lusane
Well said and sadly, necessary to say, like telling a toddler not to put a fork in an electrical socket.
>necessary to say, like telling a toddler not to put a fork in an electrical socket.
But would you tell Trump not to do that if he was sitting right in front of you?
Sorry, just had to say it but which contributes nothing to the seriousness of the discussion.
I’ll second your comment though and thanks for this post. Any worker at the local food bank deserves this award before Trump.
I can’t wait (or maybe I can), to hear the whining from Trump when he doesn’t win.
I have read that Trump wins the club championship at his golf courses without actually playing in them, which is a remarkable talent…That is the thing about golf. A few hours on the golf course with anyone tells you everything you need to know about that person.
David Owen on playing golf with Donald Trump.
As I’ve often said, the title of Rick Reilly’s book Commander in Cheat: How Golf Explains Trump is actually kinda right.
Just one more reason NC is essential. Such a Kantian handle the readers will identify! And one of my favorites of all time, since I am a dingus of the first magnitude at times.
Ain’t we’s all.
Delighted you’re delighted by the Kantian wink. Hammett and Kant, c’est moi.
Ugh … @any Golf metaphor …
I mean out of all the players on the orb only about 10% can play competitively day in and day out. After that only maybe 10% can make a dual work living off it, and lastly 2% make packet.
Heck I know a Champaign Lake family that threw stoopid money at the youngest kid so they could play the pro game as the father was a huge fan. Stories about getting up the wait staff at Pebble because it was too slow and putting in the dinning room to show his disdain at not being attend.
In September 11, 1941, following the “Greer” incident, the U.S. military authorized its escort vessels to attack German submarines.
In 1945, U.S. troops killed 110,000 Okinawan civilians.
I want to know how the author of this article views President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
I don’t like having to get rough with commenters, but your remark demands it.
What does that have to do with the 2025 Peace Prize? Your comment is whataboutism, which is a logically invalid form of argument and a violation of our written site Policies. It also looks like an insinuation of a ad hominem attack, a second Policies violation. On top of that, it is assignment, which is a third violation. This article is syndicated from TomDispatch. Why don’t you write Tom Engelhardt since we are not mind readers?
Having said that, it does take talent of a sort to pack in so many bad faith argumentation tactics in such a short comment.
Looking at the Nobel Peace Prize, perhaps Trump’s win would cement it’s complete demise. The Nobel of course is built on money earned from gunpowder. Irony much?
Obama was given the peace prize almost before he put his boots under the chair. That would be the same Obama who later opined that it turned out he was really good at killing people. Then Bob Dylan got a Nobel Prize for something or other.
The Nobel Prize is not being judged by Ghandi. Every decision is being made by lesser human beings. And human beings are swayed by all sorts of things. Politics, image, inducements, hectoring. Even in the sciences there are professional jealousies and heated differences of opinion, and who gets a Nobel is always a matter of opinion.
Looking at the 10 reasons above.
1. Perhaps Jan 6 was a setup. Chief of Security at the WH seems to think so. And unfolding evidence of dozens of plain clothes FBI agents attending Jan 6 says perhaps there are things we don’t know.
2. The US has been hollowed out for decades, jobs lost overseas and people brought in as cheap labour. People who lost jobs and whose wages have flatlined since the 1970s and fear homelessness have a beef when they see the billionaires being created every day. A nation has borders for a reason. If all the undocumented migrants voted for Trump, would the writer still be so protective of them? But ICE does look like thuggery, not good.
3. USAID – As I understand it, this was a US propaganda slush fund fueling colour revolutions, operating under cover of humanitarian work.
4.Yes, Trump does seem to be generating lying bs to justify the developing militarisation of the US
5. Yes, Trump is threatening others with takeover, but he is only doing in public what every other President did covertly. Libya. Iran. Syria. Russia. Ukraine. So is it more acceptable to destroy other countries by stealth?
6. Yes ,Trump is interfering in other countries very publicly. Every other administration had the decency to destabilise and destroy other countries in a much more refined way. Obama droned people at weddings, but he was so cool about it
.
7. Yes, Trump isnt recognising legal niceties. But then droning US citizens overseas probably wasnt legal, nor was fomenting revolutions in other places, but it was done way cooler.
8. See above, Libya, ISIS, Ukraine. US bombs are falling everywhere and have been for decades. What does it matter which plane delivers them.
9. The WHO cruelled its pitch during Covid. Would not admit that Covid is airborne, perhaps to save businesses from the expenses of HEPA aircon. As political as all getout, and not in a way that protected citizens so much. And as regards issues of discrimination in Europe, I would like to ask the Russians how welcoming the EU has been to them. Aurelian tells a good story of reverse racism in France and the impact that is having on young women.
10. Yes, Trump is definitely complicit in the Gaza genocide. As was Biden. And going back a bit, we could include Bush Jnr, Clinton, Bush Snr, Reagan perhaps. The Nakba happened in 1948? and there was a fair bit of death and displacement then. This is just Israel’s final implementation.
When was there an American president who was worthy of a Nobel Peace Prize?
Thanks, Arvid, solid counter-post to Clarence’s acceptance of bong standard normalacy
As someone who was deeply offended by Obama’s Nobel Prize* from the day he was awarded it allow me to point out that being the latest in a long line of posers does not make Donald Trump’s record any more qualifying for an honor supposedly about promoting real peace. See all the points you couldn’t nit pick.
If your point was that the Award itself is already pretty meaningless because of its record of all too often awarding war mongering self promoting jerks and then refusing to revoke those awards you might want to just say that.
I tend to agree with the gist of your comment. Though I think ArvidMartensen was mainly trying to make your last point – i.e. that there has been no American president worthy of the “Peace” prize and a number of undeserving winners in the past – I do see the value in listing these reasons explicitly. And they are mostly good reasons in my view.
That said, this piece by Lusane does demonstrate the usual Tom’s Dispatch liberal myopia. There are the unqualified statements about Jan. 6 and USAID, as ArvidMartensen points out. There is his failure to critique the last outrageous example of an American Presidential recipient. Though he does criticize Hillary Clinton, it was quite telling that this was because she had the audacity to praise Trump’s (actually empty) efforts toward peace in Ukraine, which in Lusane’s view was “all too willing to grant concessions to the universally recognized aggressor in that conflict, Russian President Vladimir Putin.” But perhaps most striking given who actually received this year’s award, he does not mention the attempts in both Trump administrations to destabilize and regime-change Venezuela.
That the Nobel “Peace Prize” committee named María Corina Machado as this year’s recipient indeed makes the key point of both of you: the award is not just worthless, it has become a blatant insult to those who sincerely seek peace in the world. I’ll take the winner of the Lay Down Your Arms award, Francesca Albanese:
https://consortiumnews.com/2025/10/09/francesca-albanese-wins-lay-down-your-arms-award/
Francesca is a jewel.
hated by all the right people.
she’s welcome around my fire any old time.
her existence in the “positive” column of Humanity, Is it Worth It?
undoes a whole bunch of those in the no column.
As to 3., similar comments to yours come up often when USAID is mentioned, and usually the humanitarian aid part is disregarded for some reason, as if it’s untrue or unimportant. The humanitarian aid could’ve been continued while stopping the regime change color revolution stuff, etc. Disgusting that Elon and Trump had no interest in doing it that way.
Here’s a recent study addressing the benefits of USAID humanitarian assistance: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)01186-9/fulltext
I suppose the study could’ve been funded by the CIA, but so could every other study ever done.
Only quibble I have is labeling the Russian Federation (and specifically the president…) as the aggressor in the war in the Donbas. It’s a heck of a lot more complicated than that, and it behooves a professor of political science and former US advisor to ECRI to have a more nuanced view of that situation.
Otherwise, yeah, Trump deserves a peace prize about as much as the prize for literature, physics, medicine… though I’m sure he thinks he deserves to get any of those as well.
Trump has always had a major chip on his shoulder about Obama and a lot of the stuff he was doing in his first term seemed to be undoing whatever Obama had done in his eight years. But here is the thing. Obama has got a Nobel peace prize, even if undeserved, while Trump does not. It is not a prize or award that he can go out and buy or have his friends arrange to give him. If he could he would threaten sanctions to get it but he can’t. I think that it obsesses him and riles him no end that Obama has one. That is why he said that if he does not get it, then it is an insult to the United States and not just him. A big man would shrug the whole thing off and move on but that is not Trump. And it looks like Venezuela’s Maria Corina Machado has just picked up this particular gong. That will drive him nuts as Machado is just a US puppet for that country whereas Trump thinks of himself as the puppet master. Next will come the temper tantrums-
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/oct/10/venezuelan-politician-maria-corina-machado-wins-nobel-peace-prize
Next week’s headlines:
Trump declares Maduro “a great guy” and announces sanctions and military strikes against “fraud” Machado
Is this the most bizarre world yet? After Kissinger, well, I gave up long ago on trying to answer that question.
Maria Corina Machado, aka Guaidó 2.0, aka Latina Tsikhanouskaya.
My internal autocorrect read Yves’ last phrase in her penultimate paragraph as, “when Obama was the prick.”
In polite society “prick” is replaced with “Reagan,” as in “when [cool black Reagan] was the [Reagan].”
Obama himself would take that as an honor — as far as I know, Obama’s biggest hero when he was at Harvard Law was Reagan himself.
Well, the excitement is over. The Norwegian committee has given the award to a candidate close to Trump policies, namely María Corina Machado, leader of the opposition to Maduro in Venezuela. The committee cite the usual nonsense about elections there not being democratic. Despite even Jimmy Carter and all the election observers who did not boycott the elections saying they found little if any evidence of fraud. A shameful choice by the Norwegians, they have given in to Trump’s bullying, bluster and blackmail via the back door in the hope of avoiding his wrath. Pathetic.
Machado supports sanctions against her own country and even advocates a “foreign intervention” for a regime change in Venezuela. What’s not to like as a peace candidate!
Yes, to update John Lennon’s remark, foreign intervention for regime change for peace is like f**king for virginity.
I agree. It is a highly political award to someone who seeks to overthrow an elected government. An absolute disgrace, the only intention of which is to interfere in another country’s politics by attempting to de-legitimise an elected President and to justify any future action by the United States to steal Venezuela’s oil.
The popes of peace in Norway take sides in Trump’s war on Venezuela.
I see. By which I mean I don’t. They feel the need to kiss his ass but not directly?
It It’s not just Trump’s war and giving it to Machado isn’t kissing Trump’s ass.
The anti-Maduro mania infects many who despise Trump also. It is conventiontal Western establishment policy.
See e.g. The Guardian newspaper is a long-time source of anti-Madura propaganda and were one of the loudest media supporters of Guaidó. They have always been strongly anti-Trump.
The NPP has long rewarded those who further Western elites aims. Not everything is about Trump.
True. I recall even Senator Bernard Sanders saying that Hugo Chavez was a “dead communist dictator”. Even after the Carter Center deemed Venezuela’s elections of him some of the “cleanest” elections in the world
https://venezuelanalysis.com/news/11511/
With “socialists” like Sanders, we don’t need no right-wing imperialists.
Does anyone have the links to a story that I remember about Machado and her gang being responsible for the murder of Chavez supporters during the coup where Hugo was deposed?
I almost wondered if this is some kind of crazy joke at Trump’s expense, but I don’t think the Norwegians, especially the modern ones, have that kind of humor.
(Although, I guess the Prince Regent was not joking when he made Baldrick a lord instead of Blackadder…)
The main reason Trump doesn’t deserve the Nobel Peace Prize is that he keeps asking for it. This typical U.S. importuning doesn’t go over well in the rest of the world.
The second reason is that Hillary Clinton logorrhea at Huff Post. Click through: It’s the usual Hillaryan lack of two functioning synapses to tell her when to shut the old piehole.
A third obstacle is that the Nobel Peace Prize comes from Norway. Here’s the current committee:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_Nobel_Committee#Members
Now, the Swedes and Finns may have lost their minds (along with the other Sauerkraut Republics from Estonia to Romania), but the Norwegians are canny and very much spirited. They will not be cowed.
I second Yves Smith’s nomination of the members of the Global Sumud Flotilla, with particular stress on the working-class members, like the dockworker from Genova José Novoi, who was kidnapped on the high seas by the Israelis, and his colleague Riccardo Rudino, who didn’t embark, but made the important statement that if Israeli forces touched the Flotilla, the dockworkers would shut it all down. And they did.
Usually, the Nobel Committee doesn’t give broadbased movements an award, and the Global Sumud Flotilla is even more diffuse in its organization than something like Amnesty International. On the other hand, the 2024 prize went to the association of survivors of the atomic bombs in Japan, Nihon Hidankyo, and much deserved.
My money is on the extraordinary Francesca Albanese, who has been touring Italy (and just met with the dockworkers and their organizations).
Just so I can witness the meltdown in D.C. Not that any of the girl goons and boy goons there have the slightest knowledge of the esteemed Jane Addams, eh.
Of course Francesca Albanese should have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for her role in documenting the war crimes of the Zionazis and for her efforts to get the West to recognise the horrors that have been brought down on the Palestinians. She is a person of rare courage in a conscienceless world. Of course, then the Zionazis and all those complicit in the crimes against the indigenous people of Palestine would lable the members of the Nobel Committee Jew haters and antisemites and that might mean they end up being sanctioned by the Fourth Reich and the dramatically unpeaceful Trump.
I agree that giving the peace prize to the Flotilla is by far the most logical choice. The antithesis of peace is war, and the most violent war killing the most people all year is against Gaza. Every peace prize is symbolic in some way, selecting someone representing a general cause going beyond just themselves to oppose a war, not merely advocating peace.
The travesty of giving the prize to the Zionist Venezuelan advocating similar warfare there is as antithetical as giving the prize to Trump. The Norwegian prize process will live in infamy for this and the other travesties cited above.
Vidkun Quisling and Jens Stoltenberg are Norwegians, as were thousands of SS men of the Wiking, Nordland, and Nord divisions. There are plenty of dubious people in Norway. I don’t think they are less crazy than the Swedes, Danes, or Finns.
PS. How is Machado any more deserving of the peace prize than Vidkun Quisling, btw? Quisling was robbed!
You need be alive for nomination. I don’t know if Quisling has the reincarnation powers, like Dalai Lama.
The awarding committee should have announced that no-one has done enough toward securing world peace and therefore there will not be an award this year.
I don’t know..
Francesca Albanese is the poster child of who SHOULD be getting a “peace” prize.
Being persecuted by the powers that be for trying to bring about justice…. and peace to the palestinian people. Exposing the war crimes and genocide by the zionist perpetrators.
the nobel peace prize is only important to fetishists.
There is no there there.
Aside from obama…. and this idiotic choice of Muchado , the US plant against Maduro;
There was henry kissinger winning it in 1973…. and get this for the “peace deal” with vietnam in 1973.
Which this absurdity is the same guy who went behind the scenes before the 1968 peace deal could be agreed upon, to NOT let a “peace” break out while the democrats were still in office.
At the LBJ library, they have tapes of kissinger associates, nixon, chennault and others that the FBI knew that these unelected republicans were trying to derail the peace deal. LBJ… considered this to be treason. But it was such a serious treason, he was worried that it would destabilize the whole system… so he didn’t make it all public.
So, kissinger, worked to make it that everyone who died, or wounded, or traumatized in vietnam between 1969 and 1975; on all sides had to suffer whatever lifechanging events befell them.
… and this absolutely evil person got the nobel peace prize…
what a joke. a sick, sick joke
so really, could it go any lower with trump… or would it be somewhere below the basalt still?
Sadly the Literature Prize has become equally politicised. Never again would someone like Pinter be awarded it. The committee was roundly condemned in the west and threatened with all sorts of reprisals for giving it to Hanke a few years ago, who had been somewhat of a voice supportive of Serbia. How dare they???
The Nobel Peace award has long been seen as much of a joke as the unofficial economics equivalent.
The award to Kissinger permanently harmed the credibility of the panel for so many folk, including me.
María Corina Machado is a highly political award and the immediate response from the White House will fill many with an overwhelming surge of schadenfreude.
There was an evident expectation by the US regime that the Gaza deal this week would sway the panel, even though nothing yet has actually been delivered.
There is always the simple fact that 47, the bigliest ever boastful global peacemaker, could have done all this months ago, had peace in the Levant ever been a personal objective.
The Trump regime has been assassinating Venezuelans, and the fact it has gone to a Venezuelan at all keeps that context alive, even if their fishermen are still being routinely murdered.
Trump hates Maduro with a vengeance and is very possibly seeking to create a future military intervention to capture Venezuelan oil, yet the award has gone to one of Maduro’s long term political opponents. Box ticked by award panel for realpolitik.
The perverse diplomatic logic of “my enemy’s enemy is my friend” doesn’t apply to Trump, whose character is so utterly dominated by his narcissism, so his clear resentment is still a win for those outside his orbit, regardless of Machado’s credibility as a recipient !
Comprehensive catalog of reasons Trump is undeserving of any real award, let alone a peace prize. The only wrong note for me was the author’s take on Ukraine, which is the standard US line. Those who know the backstory know the war didn’t just start in 2022 with the SMO. It is a war the US provoked, and the US has cynically used Ukrainians as cannon fodder for our war against Russia and Putin. We are the one who’ve repeatedly demonstrated we care not a whit for Ukraine’s “sovereignty”.
Not that he did it for any of the right reasons, but remember when Trump considered not sending weapons to Ukraine? Had he followed through, that might have been worthy of a peace prize. Instead, the Democrat party impeached him for that.
Peace sells, but nobody’s buying.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTM6t1sLync&list=RDVTM6t1sLync&start_radio=1
I’m reminded of the brilliant Tom Lehrer saying he would quit writing satirical music because political satire became obsolete when Henry Kissinger was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
Great reference. The Nobel “peace” prize is awarded by a group of vassal-sycophants in Norway. It is good for sarcastic jokes though.
The Nobel Peace Prize Has Become Orwellian Farce for Western Elites
From Sputnik today. https://sputnikglobe.com/20251010/nobel-peace-prize-has-become-orwellian-farce-for-western-elites–1122940011.html
Comments from MoA:
MOA: Nobel Committee, Fearing Trump’s Wrath, Hands Peace Prize To Regime Change Puppet
I am not sure if the following article from 2024 has ever been linked to by NC. It is written by Francisco Dominguez, a former refugee from Chile in the UK, now Head of the Centre for Brazilian and Latin American Studies at Middlesex University, London, United Kingdom.
He sets out all the attempts by the new Nobel laureate, aided and abetted by the usual US suspects and how western media and politicians etc., keep bleating about electoral fraud etc. The Norwegians must be terrified of the wrath of the Orange Man. Worth reading.
https://orinocotribune.com/venezuela-presidential-election-us-and-accomplices-left-grasping-at-straws/
Dumbya (in one of the photos above) sets a high bar for any rogues gallery in past 50 years, Trump not even close.
Here is precisely why he should be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize – the entire prize/enterprize, is perhaps the most successful case of fraudulent reputational laundering in history, perpetrated by one of the godfathers of modern warfare:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onr80iOoEXs
Anything which stretches its believability and discredits it further, is a good thing which paves the way for its replacement.