This is Naked Capitalism fundraising week. 1317 donors have already invested in our efforts to combat corruption and predatory conduct, particularly in the financial realm. Please join us and participate via our donation page, which shows how to give via check, credit card, debit card, PayPal, Clover, or Wise. Read about why we’re doing this fundraiser, what we’ve accomplished in the last year, and our current goal, Karōshi prevention.
Yves here. Nicolas Davies explains why UN members should not sit on their hands as the latest Israel-Palestine peace charade plays out. He delineates concrete steps the UN can take to increase pressure on Israel and the US and improve Palestine’s position.
By Nicolas J. S. Davies, an independent journalist, a researcher for CODEPINK and the author of Blood on Our Hands: The American Invasion and Destruction of Iraq. He is also the co-author, with Medea Benjamin, of War In Ukraine: Making Sense of a Senseless Conflict, which just came out in a new revised, updated 2nd edition.
As U.S. President Donald Trump surely intended, his “20-point Gaza plan” succeeded in upstaging calls by many other world leaders at the UN General Assembly for concrete, coordinated UN-led measures to force Israel to end its criminal genocide in Gaza and the illegal occupation of Palestine.
Trump’s White House meeting with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyah on September 29th coincided with the last day of the annual meeting of the UN General Assembly in New York, where Trump had met with eight Arab and Muslim leaders at the UN and won their support for a proposed plan for Gaza. In a textbook bait-and-switch, Trump then allowed the Israelis to significantly alter his plan before he unveiled it to the world at his meeting with Netanyahu, but pretended it was the same plan that the leaders of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE and other countries had endorsed.
Trump’s plan is based on cornering Hamas into a series of steps it hasn’t agreed to: freeing all the Israeli prisoners in Gaza without a full Israeli withdrawal; surrendering its weapons and its role in Palestinian politics; and handing Gaza over to a new phase of Israeli occupation. Gaza would be governed by a “board” headed by Trump and former U.K. prime minister Tony Blair, who not only invaded Iraq alongside the U.S. in 2003, but at the same time masterminded a dirty war against Hamas that led to the isolation and blockade of Gaza, and ultimately to the current crisis.
Under Trump’s plan, Israel would agree to end its genocidal assault on Gaza and partially withdraw its forces, but nothing in his plan would prevent it relaunching the genocide once the Israeli prisoners in Gaza were safely back in Israel. It would also retain control of Gaza’s borders with Israel and Egypt, allowing it to keep restricting the entry of food, medicine and rebuilding materials.
In response to Trump’s proposal, Hamas agreed to release all its Israeli prisoners in return for an Israeli release of Palestinian prisoners, but only after a permanent Israeli ceasefire and withdrawal from Gaza. Prime minister Netanyahu said publicly that Israel will not withdraw its forces from Gaza until Hamas and other Palestinian forces have been removed from power and disarmed, while Hamas insists it will not disarm until the occupation of Palestine ends and its fighters can hand over their weapons to the new armed forces of the sovereign nation of Palestine.
Hamas also responded that it has no authority to act as the sole negotiator in talks on the future of Palestine. It said Palestine must be governed by Palestinians, not Trump or Blair, and that its future must be negotiated between representatives of all Palestinian factions.
So Trump’s plan is rife with conditions that one side or the other won’t agree to, and it seems unlikely to end the genocide. But in any case, it is clearly designed to perpetuate, not to end, Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestine. As the Progressive International said in a statement on October 7th:
Far from paving a path to peace, it offers a blueprint for the further colonisation and subjugation of the Palestinian people — the culmination of decades of dispossession and destruction that reached its dark zenith in the ongoing genocide in Gaza.
The current negotiations may collapse quickly or drag on for weeks or months, but the UN and the world’s governments should not sit idly by as passive observers. The UN should urgently prepare to take the concrete steps that leaders from around the world called for at the General Assembly in September, to give force to UN General Assembly resolutions calling for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, the unrestricted restoration of life-saving humanitarian aid, and a final end to the brutal Israeli occupation of Palestine.
In July 2025, the UN General Assembly organized a “High-level International Conference for the Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine and the Implementation of the Two-State Solution.” The conference was chaired by France and Saudi Arabia, and its goal was “not only to reaffirm international consensus on the peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine but to catalyze concrete, timebound and coordinated international action toward the implementation of the two-State solution.”
The conference produced a lengthy “New York Declaration,” which was endorsed by the General Assembly in a resolution on September 12th, by a vote of 142 to 10, with 12 abstentions.
But this was a plan for the “day after,” which, by itself, failed to bring that day any closer, because it deliberately avoided taking the “concrete, timebound and coordinated international action” that the conference’s mandate had explicitly called for.
The declaration was based on the deliberations of 8 working groups, co-chaired by representatives of 15 different countries, the Arab League and the European Union, which each drew up plans for the aftermath of a hypothetical permanent ceasefire in Gaza, with topics like “Humanitarian Action and Reconstruction” and “Security for Israelis and Palestinians.”
Three roundtables at the July conference, chaired by former Irish president Mary Robinson, former Colombian president Juan Manuel Santos and former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid bin Ra’ad of Jordan, agreed that the General Assembly’s first step should be the international recognition of the state of Palestine.
UN recognition requires the approval of both the General Assembly and the UN Security Council. However, with such a large majority of countries supporting recognition, and the United States abusing its veto to sideline the Security Council, the General Assembly can call an Emergency Special Session (ESS) to act alone under the “Uniting for Peace” principle, to officially recognize Palestine and welcome it as a full UN member.
Instead, while several Western countries finally recognized Palestine, bringing the total number who have recognized its independent statehood to 157, the declaration was endorsed in a regular session of the General Assembly that lacked the power to grant formal UN recognition.
But the most serious omission from the July 2025 conference and the September 12th resolution was that they failed to take concrete, coordinated UN action to impose a ceasefire in Gaza, the vital first step to get to the “day after” that the working groups at the conference were tasked with planning for. Trump took advantage of that omission to propose an end to the genocide in Gaza on terms that would perpetuate the Israeli occupation instead of ending it.
It was entirely predictable that Israel would reject and ignore the New York Declaration, and prime minister Netanyahu did just that in his General Assembly speech on September 26th. But after most of the delegates walked out and left Netanyahu ranting to a nearly empty hall, the Hague Group of countries led by Colombia and South Africa hosted a meeting with representatives of 34 countries to plan the coordinated, concrete action the UN must now take to end the genocide and the occupation.
As Cuban foreign minister Bruno Rodriguez Parilla told the General Assembly in his speech the next day, it should convene an Emergency Special Session “without further delay” to take concrete measures for Palestine, including a binding resolution on full UN membership.
If the General Assembly is serious about ending the genocide and the occupation, the Emergency Special Session must also debate and vote on a UN-led arms embargo, economic boycott and other concrete measures designed to force Israel to comply with international law, international court rulings and UN resolutions on Palestine.
The UN Human Rights Office in Geneva already has a database of 158 Israeli and multinational corporations that are complicit in Israel’s illegal occupation, so an international boycott of those companies could take effect immediately.
Israel is a small country, dependent on trade and economic relations with countries all over the world. If the large majority of countries that voted for the New York Declaration are ready to back their words and their votes with coordinated action, a UN-led trade boycott, divestment campaign and arms embargo can put enormous pressure on Israel to end its genocide in Gaza and its illegal occupation of Palestine. With full participation by enough countries, these steps could quickly make Israel’s position untenable.
Many speakers at the 2025 General Assembly called passionately for this kind of decisive action to bring about a ceasefire in Gaza and end the occupation. King Abdullah of Jordan asked, “How long will we be satisfied with condemnation after condemnation without concrete action?”
President Lula said that Brazil already has an arms embargo against Israel and has cut off all trade with its illegal settlements; Turkiye severed all trade links with Israel in August; Dutch prime minister Dick Schoof called for an arms embargo and the suspension of the EU’s trade agreement with Israel; and Chadian prime minister Allah-Maye Halina declared, “Our duty from this moment on is to transform this strong declaration into concrete acts and make the Palestinian people’s hope a reality.”
The Hague Group of countries was formed by the Progressive International to support South Africa’s genocide case at the International Court of Justice and war crimes cases against Israeli officials at the International Criminal Court. In a meeting at Bogota in Colombia in July, twelve of those countries committed to an arms embargo and other concrete measures against the Israeli occupation. In his speech to the General Assembly on September 23rd, Colombian president Gustavo Petro called for an Emergency Special Session on Palestine and for a UN peacekeeping force to “defend Palestine.”
A previous Emergency Special Session in September 2024 demanded that Israel must end its post-1967 occupation of Palestine within a year. Israel’s refusal to even begin to do so, and its defiant escalation of its genocide in Gaza, increasing repression in the other occupied territories and attacks on other countries provide all the grounds the General Assembly should need to take the concrete, coordinated measures that many countries are calling for.
Tragically, instead of applying the diplomatic and economic pressure it will take to secure a ceasefire and end the occupation, France, Saudi Arabia and their partners instead relied on dangling carrots in front of Israel, such as regional economic integration and recognition by Arab and Muslim countries, to try to seduce or bribe Israel into complying with international law and UN resolutions.
This was never going to work. The toothless New York Declaration, and now Trump’s new occupation plan for Gaza, have wasted irreplaceable, precious lost time for the besieged, starved, bombed people of Gaza, as more of them are killed, maimed and starved to death every day. The UN General Assembly must follow up on these flawed initiatives with decisive UN-led action to actually end the genocide and the occupation, by imposing economic sanctions, an arms embargo and other measures to diplomatically and economically isolate Israel.
There is nothing to prevent the UN General Assembly from quickly convening a new meeting of its Emergency Special Session on Palestine. The ESS can finally take the “concrete, time-bound, coordinated international action” that the French- and Saudi-led initiative promised but failed to deliver – what Malaysian foreign minister Mohamad Hasan described to the General Assembly as “concrete action against the occupying force.”
Across the world, ordinary people are rising up to demand that their governments take action, while flotillas of activists set sail to breach the blockade of Gaza that their governments have failed to challenge.
The Emergency Special Session of the UN General Assembly, meeting under the Uniting for Peace principle, can debate and pass binding resolutions on UN recognition of Palestine, a UN-led international arms embargo, economic boycott and disinvestment campaign, war crimes prosecutions, and other measures to diplomatically isolate Israel.
By responding to calls of conscience from their own people, voting for these measures at the UN and acting quickly to enforce them, the governments of the world have the collective power to end this genocide and the brutal, illegal occupation of Palestine that it is part of. Now they must use it.
26 comments
Comments are closed.
I have the nagging feeling that since there is some kind of agreement for a cease-fire, exchange of prisoners, and partial retreat of Israeli troops, all those countries that had imposed partial arms embargoes on Israel will declare that everything is now in order and therefore resume their shipments of weaponry.
As for the UNO: lots of words, little action. Nothing will happen as long as countries, especially European, Arabic, and North American ones, do not act and impose effective sanctions (diplomatic, economic, financial, military) every time Israel violates agreements and international law. And seeing how some of those countries disregarded the ICC decisions, I do not think that we can expect much from their side.
you think the weapons of the IDF mainly come from imports?
Correct me if I am wrong, but my understanding is that most of the electronics and the heavy ammunition does.
Among the weapons and equipment of the IDF, many eye-catching items （F35）do come from imports. However, conventional equipment such as tanks, howitzers, smoothbore guns, automatic rifles, and military drones are mostly domestically produced. Additionally, Israel has the capability to produce ballistic missiles and atomic bombs indigenously.
Did you read what I wrote?
Israel is highly dependent on imports for the supply of artillery shells, aircraft bombs, and missiles. In fact, the on-going conflicts (against the Palestinians, Lebanese, Syrians, Iranians, and Yemenis) highlighted the extent of that dependency so that the Israeli government is making plans to set up domestic production lines for ammunition.
Same situation for electronics. While Israel manufactures some, is very capable at integrating components into complete systems, and has superior software competences, it is highly dependent on imports of electronics for its armament. Where do you think the batteries for Israeli drones come from, for instance?
Without high-end weapon equipments like the F-35, the IDF can still use howitzers and automatic rifles to kill enemy troops. These conventional weapons cause more collateral damage to civilians.
There’s a factory here in South Carolina that sends the steel artillery shell bodies to Israel to be filled with explosives. Do you think tiny Israel can make such things?
Internationally Israel’s only real power is hasbara power along with copious bribes to politicians around the world. JFK said that one of these was to Truman’s ’48 campaign resulting in his American support for the creation of Israel.
Of course it would be naive to deny that all power depends on public acceptance of its existence but in this instance the question of “how many divisions does Netanyahu have” brings the answer: not many at all. They are totally dependent on outside support.
So blame the tragedy in Gaza on all those bribed politicians including our president and not just the Israelis who are doing what they are allowed to get away with. The UN itself became a kind of “victor’s justice” with the creation of the Security Council. It may seem that it has been neutered but how much peace has it really brought us?
Per Epstein, bribery plus blackmail. Which rather begs the question over how the Epstein Operation ensnared key women.
The Defense Ministry on Tuesday signed two major deals with Elbit Systems for the local arms contractor to supply the military with thousands of heavy bombs and establish a new facility to manufacture raw materials.
The deals were estimated at NIS 1 billion ($275 million), the Defense Ministry said.
The ministry said the agreements were “crucial for enhancing the IDF’s operational endurance and force build-up capabilities,” and represented a “central lesson learned from the war.”
Under the first agreement, Elbit was to supply thousands of heavy air munitions used by the Israeli Air Force.
This would apparently reduce Israel’s need to rely on the United States, which in late spring held up a shipment of heavy bombs.
Why do you think a country that exported $14.79 billion worth of arms in 2024 is unable to manufacture howitzers, smoothbore guns, artillery shells, and bombs?
Hand to hand combat will see more dead israelis and about the same number of palestinian, while your israeli f 35 just kills palestinians (and, of course, lots of other people as well.)
Just deserts? (h/t brueenig)
I disagree, H2H combat will see zionazis die tenfold or more. They are known worldwide as supreme pussies against armed men who know how to fight. Their only power is against unarmed women, children and elderly, preferably from above or miles away.
It’s the USA way. The Big Daddy way.
It really looks like US & Israel are taking some time-out from the genocide to consolidate and prepare forces for attack on Iran. Basically what they did the last time. So stocking up on arms will be high on the todo list.
Did this article mistakenly write “prisoner” instead of “hostage”?
I took the use of the term “prisoners” for both Israeli and Palestinian captives to be a deliberate decision.
To describe the Israeli captives as “hostages” and the Palestinian captives as “prisoners” describes one captivity as illegitimate and the other as legitimate, even when there has been evidence of detention of Gazans by Israel without any juridical or even military basis (such as the capture and detention of doctors and other important members of civil society, seemingly because they were important members of civil society) (not to mention the routine capture and detention of West Bank Palestinians for the crime of getting in the way).
Alternatively, one could validly describe the Israeli captives as “hostages” because they are held by Hamas as leverage. But then one would have to describe Palestinian captives in the same way, because the exchange of captives demonstrates that they are held by Israel for the same end. Their exchange for Israeli captives clearly makes the point that their use as bargaining chips outweighs any supposed legal basis for their detention.
Palestinian prisoners are tried in court and have lawyers to defend them. Do Israeli hostages have access to these?
In its history, Israel has only carried out the death penalty once on a prisoner it arrested (Adolf Eichmann). On the other side, however…
This isnt a good site to spew Hasbara.
Palestinians in administrative detention do not have lawyers or any sort of due process. The Israelis being held are all soldiers of an occupying army captured in battle. Thus they are PoWs.
Israel is currently murdering innocent people in more countries than I can keep count of, including a genocide in Palestine.
Good riddance.
The Israelis being held are all soldiers of an occupying army captured in battle. Thus they are PoWs.
===========================
Including Kfir Bibas?
There are so many western-approved explanations, you just have to choose your favorite: Israeli militants are using babies as human shields; collateral damage; actually Israel killed them; the aggressor and occupant is responsible for everything; etc.
After years of Lucy and the football it’s hard to believe that this isn’t just another one.
For the people suffering so much I hope this is the beginning of a new chapter
What’s more notable is that they are treating what is happening in Gaza like it’s divorced from what is happening with Syria, Lebanon, and Iran.
Should real “peace” talks be more all encompassing?
And if wee Donald is really hankering over the peace prize, won’t invading Iran and/or Venezuala put the kibosh on that?
How will the United Nations ensure that GAZA does not become a hotbed of terrorist attacks in the future?
More germaine to the article we’re discussing, and of course when looking at their respective body counts, is the question of how the United Nations shall ensure that ISRAEL not continue to be a hotbed of terrorist attacks in the future, dear troll.
How will the United Nations ensure that the United Nations does not become a hotbed of terrorist attacks in the future?