Discussions of technology-driven change fail to distinguish between productivity-enhancing technology and disruptive technology.
Friday, February 12, 2016
Marriage is the new cheap fix for poverty…which means by implication that single low income women are a new category of the undeserving poor.
Flint is just the tip of the iceberg of lead poisoning in America.
Today’s Water Cooler: TPP and impunity, New Hampshire votes, Clinton goes negative, JOLTS, liquidity, Hong Kong fracas, corvids and forests
A very readable, information-rich post on what the Fed does and does not do, with emphasis on the nitty-gritty of monetary policy. If you are time-pressed, read the last item in the FAQ first, which is a terse item-by-item debunking of widely made, inaccurate statements about the Fed.
Bad loans are not the only reason to worry about banks. ZIRP and negative interest rates will bleed them to death, and Eurobanks are at real risk of bank runs.
Posted by Yves Smith at 6:55 am |
Big Pharma’s claim that it is hard pressed to find cash for R&D spending needs to be taken with a fistful of salt.
A rundown of how nice the various top presidential candidates are likely to be to Big Energy.
Real men are evidently an endangered species,. Chinese communists and the American Enterprise Institute are in the vanguard of trying to fix that.
Today’s Water Cooler: Clinton surrogate eruptions, New Hampshire primary, year of the monkey, Christie privatizes NJ water, Richard Pryor
Given what Hillary and Gore have said about Nafta, it’s time to ask candidates much more pointed questions about Nafta and the TPP.
Posted by David Dayen at 6:55 am |
Equity investors think private equity funds will show no profits on their current deals, which contrasts sharply with portfolio company valuations.
I suppose we’re going to have to deal with half-truths and logical stretches about Dodd-Frank right through until November, but Bernie Sanders’ focus on Wall Street has really ramped this up of late. The trajectory appears to be a show of proof of some sort, followed by a blog link from Paul Krugman, at which point the citation hardens into conventional wisdom. The version of this that began a few days ago with Wonkblog’s Matt O’Brien has a level of truth to it, of course, but I don’t think it reveals exactly what its endorsers think.