Why Climate Science Shouldn’t Forget to Factor in Brain Health

Yves here. With the in-your-face and unresolved health public health issues of Covid and now a panoply of other nasty, mainly respiratory, pathogens, worrying about the impact of climate change, particularly on neurological functioning may seem like a comparative luxury.

One danger is exposure to extreme heat and another, to pollution. Of course, poorer people are more exposed than the rich, hence don’t expect action any time soon.

By Burcin Ikiz, Ph.D., a neuroscientist and writer who covers brain health on her Psychology Today blog “Connecting Neurons” and other outlets. Originally published at Undark

Climate change is the biggest global health threat facing us today. According to the Lancet Countdown’s 2022 report that came out in October, the climate crisis is “undermining every dimension of global health monitored.” Its effects include direct impacts, such as extreme weather events and sea-level rise, as well as indirect ones, like increased food insecurity, forced migrations, the spread of infectious diseases, and heat-related illnesses.

But one piece of information missing in most health reports, as well as in many climate change studies and international conferences, such as COP27, is how it affects — and will affect — our brains.

The oversight might be understandable, given how little we truly know about the subject. Over the decade I have studied neurodegenerative diseases as a neuroscientist, I have come across only a handful of studies on climate change and brain health. But that’s exactly why it’s so critical to increase public awareness, funding, and research focus on this topic. We need to elucidate how a warming climate impacts the brain so we can find ways to prevent or alleviate its damage to our health.

From the little we do know, the neurological harms associated with climate change may range widely from hindering brain development to increasing the risk for certain diseases. A growing body of evidence suggests that our changing climate will likely negatively affect our brains through different pathways. One is through exposure to extreme heat. Like the rest of our bodies, our brains have an ideal temperature for optimal functioning. Any deviation can result in various symptoms ranging from reduced productivity to worsening symptoms of neurological and mental disorders, such as multiple sclerosis, substance use disorders, schizophrenia, and suicide risk.

Scientists have also shown that heat exposure can induce long-term learning and memory deficits in rats with mild traumatic brain injury and complex metabolic changes in rodent brains implicated in neurodegeneration. Meanwhile, infectious diseases, such as Zika and dengue are rising due to increasing temperatures and may result in severe neurological outcomes like encephalitis and encephalopathy. Long-term exposure to air pollution and fine inhalable particles, known as PM 2.5, have also been strongly linked to increased risk for dementia.

We are already facing an epidemic of neurodegenerative diseases. More than 6 million Americans alone are living with Alzheimer’s disease today. This number is projected to more than double in the next 30 years. And yet, after decades of research and many failed clinical trials, we still don’t have a cure or ways to truly slow down diseases such as dementia, Parkinson’s disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or ALS. In the next 50 years or so, we will not only see millions more people with these fatal and incurable disorders, but with the effects of climate change, we will likely see them occurring more frequently and at much earlier stages of life.

What’s the most concerning is that the developing brains of children and adolescents are possibly the most susceptible to the adverse effects of climate change. Researchers have found a strong link between air pollution and an increased risk for changes in brain development in children and teens, resulting in lower IQs, poorer hand-eye coordination, and neurodevelopmental disorders. One study even predicts that rising water temperatures will reduce the synthesis of DHA, an omega-3 fatty acid critical for healthy brain development, by algae, which in turn could severely limit access to this critical nutrient for 96 percent of the world’s population.

The field of the climate’s effects on brain health is still burgeoning, but these early studies demonstrate how a singular factor related to climate change, such as extreme heat or higher pollution levels, can impair our brains and threaten those of future generations.

However, climate change is complex, and as weather patterns change, we will likely be subject to not just one but multiple stressors simultaneously for an extended time. And science does not yet know what these exposures can do to our nervous systems long-term. For example, during my training as a postdoc, I remember observing mouse neurons dying in a dish within days of exposure to a neurotoxin found in algal blooms, which are in a global surge due to the warming climate. The experience made me wary of what such a toxin may be capable of doing to human brains in real life.

While these findings may seem scary, there is hope. Our brains are fascinating organs that can find ways to mitigate damage given the opportunity. Our adaptable nerve cells can amend their connections and reorganize their wiring. With the same actions we take to curb climate change, to prevent air pollution, excessive heat, and exposure to harmful substances, we can prevent and mitigate damage to our brains, and to our children’s.

But we can only do so if we first understand the extent and range of climate change’s harm. That is why we need more scientists to focus their research efforts on assessing its impact on our brains. Moreover, we need climate policy and decision-makers to pay attention to this issue so that they can introduce strategies that can protect vulnerable populations from further damage.

Climate change’s effects won’t bypass the brain, so neither should climate science.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


  1. earthling

    Eye opening information on air pollution and particles being associated with dementia.

    Let’s keep being the weirdo who masks up/walks away from excessive vehicle exhaust, etc.

  2. Martín

    It is pretty hard to forget about climate and brain health these days, but not in the way the article describes.

    Just by acknowledging climate change, mental health becomes at stake, with many suffering from climate crisis induced stress, anxiety, and depression, as it can be psychologically devastating to feel climate and ecological catastrophe closing in every day. This is a powerful reason for people to consciously or unconsciously disregard climate change, and a big hurdle to overcome if we are to tackle this problem. Our human brains al ill-equipped to deal with doomsday scenarios.

    1. John R Moffett

      Yes, and I know people who have what should be called CTSD, or Covid Traumatic Stress Disorder. People who have strong health-related fears have been traumatized by the pandemic, just as others have been traumatized by ecocide and extreme weather events. So there is plenty of panic, and excess cortisol, which can lead to prolonged trauma-related brain disorders. The corporate owned news is fueled by panic-mongering, so they aren’t helping the situation at all.

  3. Herb

    I had expected that the article would address the direct effect of rising CO2 levels on the brain.

    The author also seems to conflate air pollution impacts and climate change impacts. Moving to a renewable energy system will dramatically reduce air pollution while temperature benefits will remain elusive for many decades after fossil fuels are no longer being widely burned. The reduction in air pollution will actually lead be to a temporary increase in global temperatures as the cooling impact of most pollution particles will no longer be available.

  4. Eric Anderson

    Funny how the differentiation of effect for the current distribution of humanity across the many different climates is unexplained. I’m left wondering if this scientist is embarked on a political career.

  5. Paula McMInn

    Climate science ought to figure in religion. We are taught to believe in something we cannot see as god. But if you study new science, it is saying to us, here is god in the no see ums of the oceans and soils. Oceans provide 70% of our atmospheric oxygen, while living soils, soils not degraded by chemicals, have billions of communities of microscopic entities bringing nutrients to all plants and to those who eat them. You should look up some of the no see ums of soil and ocean. You might believe in god again and you might do more to protect your earth. Indigenous were never wrong. Protect them tho they are foreign to you in your cities so distant from living soil and ocean. Their native wisdom about this planet is being revealed by science. Christianity taught us to believe in something unseen, a god. Best we all start knowing who that unseen god is.

    1. thousand points of green

      Here’s a book about one particular group and aspect of those no see ums, in this case bacterial no see ums moving between the soil itself and the plants who grow in the soil.

      Here’s a paper by one of the principal scientitst developing this science of rhizophagy and plant-based endophytes in his lab at Rutgers. For those who like dense science, densely written.

Comments are closed.