Milei’s Controversial Plan to Turn Argentina into a Money Launderer’s Paradise

“The key is that nobody asks where you got your dollars.”

President Javier Milei is on a mission to transform Argentina into a paradise for money launderers — including, it seems, the creative accountants of drug trafficking organisations. Both he and Economy Minister Luis Caputo have spoken in recent days about “relaxing” (in the FT’s words) Argentina’s curbs on tax evasion and money laundering in a bid to attract billions of dollars of hidden savings back into the formal economy.

The proposal contrasts starkly with the general direction of travel on cash these days, with most governments looking to make it harder to use, deposit and withdraw physical currency. As we reported two weeks ago, Spain’s tax agency has implemented a raft of anti-money laundering measures including one stipulating that anyone planning to withdraw more than $3,000 of their own money from the bank must notify the State in advance, or risk facing punitive fines.

France’s Justice Minister Gerald Darmanin has gone even further, proposing to abolish cash transactions altogether on the grounds that digital payments – including cryptocurrencies – are much easier to trace than physical money and would help authorities combat drug trafficking and other criminal activity.

As such, the Milei government’s proposals should, in principle, represent a welcome step in the opposite direction. However, while the proposals are still somewhat fuzzy on detail, the language used by Milei and Caputo in recent days suggests their intent is not so much to relax tax evasion and money laundering rules as it is to remove them altogether.

This will be a boon not just for criminal organisations but also for inveterate tax evaders who for years, if not decades, have stashed their money in tax havens like Panama and the Cayman Islands, including Caputo himself. The government calls the initiative the “Plan for the Historic Reparations of the Savings of Argentines”, and says it will take place in two stages.

“The first involves everything that the national executive branch can do and is within its reach. It will be applied by decree, which the President will sign in the next few hours, and the UIF will adapt its regulations to the new scheme,” said Milei’s spokesperson, Manuel Adorni. One of the decrees signed by Milei stipulates that there will be no fiscal control over cash operations involving sums lower than just under $50,000.

The second stage, said Adorni, “will consist of a bill [sent to Congress] to shield Argentine savers from here to the future, against the next administrations.”

Ask No Questions, Get No Answers

“I do not care in the slightest” how Argentines got their dollars, Milei said during a television interview on Monday, during which he appeared to encourage tax evasion and play down the risk of courting organised crime. From the Buenos Aires Herald:

Asked about dollars stemming from tax evasion, the president said that “taxes are robbery,” later adding: “people who tried to protect themselves from thieving politicians are heroes, not criminals.”

He went on to argue that organized crime such as drug trafficking should be combated by the Security Ministry and the Defence Ministry, without involving the economy. “You do not use the economy to fight crime,” he said.

Nick here. Even for Milei, who admits to having regular conversations with his dead dog through a medium, this is an absurd thing to say. After all, it is through the economy that criminal organisations are able to transform the proceeds of their activities into untraceable money that can easily be spent, or into assets that can be held or sold.

What the Milei government is essentially proposing to do is, on the one hand, escalate its “all-out war” on the drug trade — which, if we’re being honest, is not very libertarian-minded — while at the same time giving drug traffickers free reign to launder their money into the official economy.

Drug money is a huge source of liquidity for the global banking system — so much so that Antonio Maria Costa, head of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, claimed that drugs money essentially saved some banks from collapse during the 2008-09 Global Financial Crisis, becoming “the only liquid capital investment available.” The fact that Canadian lender TD Bank was recently fined $3 billion for laundering drug money suggests this trend is alive and well.

And that appears to be what Milei’s new fiscal amnesty is ultimately all about: remonetising Argentina’s financial system (and central bank) using the proceeds of crime and tax evasion, because something tells me it will be mainly criminals, both of the blue- and white-collar variety, (and not everyday Argentines) who will be taking advantage of the new rules. And even some of them may blanch at the idea of putting their money in Argentina’s banking system.

Now, back to the Buenos Aires Herald piece:

For the measure to work, [Milei] said, “the key is that nobody asks where you got your dollars. What’s more, I don’t care where you got your dollars. I don’t care in the slightest. That’s to say, economic issues are fixed in the economy. Issues of other kinds are fixed in the legal and judicial sphere. You have to understand that: they shouldn’t be mixed.”

After the plans were announced, María Eugenia Marano, a lawyer focusing on economic crimes, told the Herald that allowing the population to use dollars with no questions asked facilitated bringing laundered money back into the financial system.

Here’s what Milei has to say about the suckers who have actually been complying with the law and paying their taxes over recent decades:

“Maybe [that person] didn’t have the talent, the guts or whatever it was to get out of the system. If everyone had managed to do the same, perhaps the politicians would have stopped stealing from us.”

All of which is darkly ironic given the Milei government ramped up taxes on just about everyone, particularly the lower middle classes, as part of the economic shock program it began administering in December 2023.

“Liberating Mattress Dollars”

In a speech at the annual conference of one of Argentina’s most powerful business lobbies, AmCham, on Tuesday Caputo spoke of “liberating” the use of “mattress dollars” to promote the “remonetisation” of economic activity. That is something Argentina desperately needs.

Industrial activity in the country plummeted by 4.5% in March, exacerbating an already well-established trend. It was the worst decline since December 2023, when the just-installed Milei government imposed a 118% devaluation. A recent report by the Interdisciplinary Institute of Political Economy (IIEP) of the University of Buenos Aires (UBA) found that exports of the sector plummeted 17% in the past 20 years.

Corporate defaults are also rising, partly due to the government’s recent lifting of currency controls, Bloomberg reports:

Companies took advantage of the currency controls that created a gap in exchange rates by importing goods at the stronger official rate and selling them in pesos linked to a weaker parallel rate. Companies were also able to borrow in the local capital markets, benefiting from investors looking to hedge against currency risks and rushing to buy securities linked to the official exchange rate, such as bonds or commercial paper.

Following those recent overhauls however, companies are beginning to stumble, with two subsidiaries of utility Albanesi SA on Monday unable to pay $19.5 million in interest on a bond that was issued just six months ago. The default adds to a list that’s expected to get longer as Milei pursues his dramatic shift of the Argentine economy.

Agro-industrial companies Grupo Los Grobo LLC, Agrofina and agricultural supplier Red Surcos SA in recent months also failed to meet their debt obligations. Red Surcos, for one, in December defaulted on the payment of two promissory notes. Los Grobo and Agrofina accumulated claims for non-payment of debts of around $300 million, according to local news reports.

So far, the defaults aren’t systemic, nor are they concentrated in a single sector. Still, they’re highlighting the growing pain points for companies in Milei’s Argentina.

Consumption, particularly among lower income groups, is also showing no sign of recovery as annual inflation remains at a still-high 47% while wages in the private sector continue to stagnate. In March consumption levels fell 5.4% year over year. It was the 16th consecutive month of decline. It is against this backdrop that the Milei government is seeking to lure billions of “mattress dollars” back into the official economy.

“It is not money laundering,” Caputo said, “it is the beginning of a new regime”:

“What we’re going to do is much deeper. It is the beginning of a new regime. In Argentina, the level of informality is so high as a result of two reasons: taxes and excessive regulations. Argentina assumes that 99.99% are criminals and this is not the case. We take this to a level of madness that leads people to escape formality.”

The Milei government estimates that Argentines have anywhere between US$200 billion and US$400 billion — the equivalent of between 33% and 66% of the country’s GDP. According to the INDEC statistical bureau, Argentines held US$256 billion in cash and deposits outside the nation’s financial system in the last quarter of 2024. Releasing that money, Milei says, could “drive a sharp acceleration in economic growth.”

Successive Argentine governments, including Milei’s, have launched tax amnesties but with muted impact. Milei has likened his proposed “Plan for the Historic Reparations of the Savings of Argentines” to a tax amnesty — just without the tax part.

You might think that such a move would earn the Milei government a stern rebuke from the US government but so far, crickets. In fact, Abigail Dressel, the chargé d’affaires of the US embassy in Argentina, spoke at the same event as Caputo, and had nothing but effusive words about US-Argentine relations and Argentina’s “radical shift in economic policy” under Milei. Perhaps conversations are taking place in private but in public there’s not been a whimper of protest from the US Treasury or State Department.

Decades of Distrust

One of the main reasons for Argentines’ penchant for holding dollars under the mattress is the chronic weakness of the Argentine peso, notes the FT:

The currency’s value has been decimated by chronic inflation, prompting people to save in dollars. When the government introduced currency controls in 2011, limiting dollar purchases in order to prop up the peso, many Argentines took their earnings outside of the legal system to a vast black market for dollars, known as “the blue”…

Those hidden dollars can be exchanged on the black market for pesos and used to make small purchases, but anything significant is risky.

Retailers must take ID for cash purchases of more than about $180 and report them to tax authorities.

The FT hints at an arguably more important reason: the general public’s distrust of the government and banking system following “several episodes in the 1990s and 2000s where the government abruptly restricted access to savings.”

Those “episodes” include the so-called “Corralito” (corral, animal pen) of December 2001, when the Fernando de la Rua government, facing a gathering bank run, imposed a limit of cash withdrawals of 250 ARS per week. At that time, the ARS was pegged artificially one to one against the dollar.

With the stroke of a pen, $70 billion of personal and business savings were frozen. Within days, de la Rua was forced to flee the Casa Rosada by helicopter following nationwide protests, strikes and looting that had resulted in 30 deaths and 400 injuries. Weeks later, his replacement, Eduardo Duhalde, depreciated the Argentine currency by 400%, leaving millions of Argentines facing ruin.

Well-connected bankers, financiers and politicians were able to pull their money out of the banking system and send it overseas before the Corralito came into effect. Much of it still remains overseas but could soon be coming back thanks to the new rules.

The question is: will Argentines in general be willing to entrust their hard-earned savings with the banks again, especially given the ongoing weakness of the economy?

Just last month, Argentina was awarded a $20 billion bailout from the IMF to steady the peso and bolster the central bank’s reserves as well as a further $22 billion from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank. The country is the biggest IMF debtor in the Fund’s 81-year history.

Viva El Narco, Carajo

Two groups of people that will probably take advantage of the opportunity to recycle their undeclared dollars into the financial system are the members of Milei’s own team who have money abroad, including Caputo himself, the central bank governor, Santiago Bausili, the Minister of Justice, Mariano Cúneo Libaron, and Milei’s chief of staff, Guillermo Francos.

Caputo was implicated in the Paradise Papers scandal, which revealed that the then-minister of finance (and now-economy minister) had failed to disclose on taking office that he was a shareholder of offshore companies created to manage hundreds of millions of dollars in tax havens. Caputo could now potentially benefit from his own department’s proposed relaxation of Argentina’s tax evasion and money laundering rules.

So, too, could Latin America’s drug traffickers and other criminal groups as well as members of Milei’s government with ties to drug traffickers, including José Luis Espert, the founder and leader of the Avanza Libertad coalition. As Raúl Kollman writes for Página 12, Argentina’s economy has long been used by narcos to launder money. They include the Colombian cartel kingpin Ignacio Alvarez Meyendorff, who is currently languishing in a US prison:

Meyendorff was extradited to the United States in 2013, a year before Argentina managed to get off the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF) grey list, which meant being among the countries most sought after by criminals – drug traffickers, human traffickers, gun runners, tax evaders – to invest dirty money. For the West, the issue is key because capitalism does not tolerate competition between legal money and illegal money, basically because the latter has zero cost: it comes from crime. Then the criminals begin to buy properties, companies, economic power and, with that, political and judicial power.

Javier Milei’s laundering proposal opens the doors for Argentina to once again become a tax and criminal haven. The president said: “Drug trafficking is a security problem, it is not fought with the economy.”

A judge in Comodoro Py begs to differ, telling Página/12 that Milei can even be charged with instigation of the crime of money laundering:

“The rules that the origin of the money must be reported and that notaries, accountants, banks have to report suspicious transactions, are established by law. And the crime is typified. In other words, evading that obligation puts the person who does so in the position of a necessary participant in the crime. And that is not avoided with a rule from any body, the Central Bank, ARCA, or whatever.”

Argentina could soon find itself placed back on the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF) grey list, which would have serious consequences for the country, warns the economist and former head of the Financial Information Unit (UIF) José “Pepe” Sbatella. They include a sharp increase in the cost of money with the interest rate on international loans “potentially tripling or quadrupling”.

The IMF, meanwhile, seems to be looking the other way. Yesterday, just minutes before the policy was launched, the Fund announced its qualified support for the Milei government’s plan to liberate “mattress cash”, warning that any measures taken must comply with international anti-money laundering schemes, which are included as part of its current $20 billion program.

But how will authorities be able to police dirty money flows if Milei has essentially eliminated all fiscal controls over cash operations lower than $50,000?

Only a month ago, the IMF President Kristalina Georgieva said:

“They told me, I’m not sure if it is true, that there are more than US$200 billion under the mattress and God knows where else. If that money is invested in Argentina, imagine what this country would be.”

The fact that both Washington and the IMF appear to be turning a blind eye to all of this is further confirmation of the farcical nature of the US-led Global War on Drugs, which, like the Global War on Terror, ultimately serves as a pretext for US military interventions and other counter-insurgency measures in resource-rich countries of the so-called “Global South”.

It’s also worth bearing in mind that the US itself already functions as a de facto tax haven with its unique financial secrecy position. As Hillel Nadler, an assistant professor at Wayne State University School of Law, recent told Forbes, this means that “foreign investors can not only avoid paying tax to the U.S., or pay minimal tax to the U.S., but they can avoid paying tax in their home countries on their profits from U.S. financial assets.”

Lastly, Georgieva also said that for the policy to be successful Argentina needs to generate confidence that this time is different. Given the current state of the country’s economy, and the fact that it is even deeper in hock to the IMF and other international financial institutions, that is likely to be a pretty hard sell.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

8 comments

  1. Terry Flynn

    Thanks. The money laundering thing caught my attention recently but in UK context. There are stricter rules on multiple bank accounts (don’t think these days I’d get away with having bank accounts in two countries if I were to move back to Australia for instance).

    I’ve had several, from what I sense independent, sources suggested to me by the YT algorithm who have questioned the number of barbershops and nail salons in a typical UK town/city. Here in Nottingham, the main Mansfield Road (A60) that runs right into the heart of the city has, within its final 300 metres or so, TEN barbershops right there in heart of the city. A lot of the other previously varied retail premises are now nail salons. WTF? The prices cannot POSSIBLY cover the rents + rates charged in Nottingham city centre. Each one lasts around 6 months, closes, then is replaced by another barbershop. Cash is king. Though Nottingham city centre does have a lot of student accommodation these days, they can’t possibly be enough business, even in conjunction with workers getting a lunchtime trim.

    This simply does not add up. Maybe we just got a lot of immigrant barbers with zero financial nous. However, having talked to my previously regular barber, that doesn’t seem to be the case. It’s happening in my suburb too. Barbers that are always empty of customers but exist in one form or another. What gives? One interesting observation made is that there are usually no receipts given to customers, no way of disproving a claim that “customer x at 1pm was a difficult one taking 1.5 hours to get it right” etc. With cuts to HMRC (tax authorities) here one wonders if they have any ability to keep tabs on these outfits. Yet the amounts (if it were the case that it’s all money laundering) seem like small beer, so I dunno. Hmmm.

    Reply
    1. Adam1

      One phenomenon that is common in the wealthy community I live in is for a spouse to open a shop in our village, which too has very high rents, and run the business for a year or 3 before closing. You know they never made any money, but the losses probably offset other taxable income. In addition, when the business opened I’m sure they recorded $50k in renovation expenses even though the shop only saw maybe $1,000 in fresh paint and mysteriously $49k of other remodeling that happened in their residential kitchen (hehehe).

      Reply
      1. Terry Flynn

        Thanks for that. I like to think I’m not one for conspiracy theories but observations like yours and what I see here make me think “this cannot possibly add up” and something is going on increasingly in the grey/black economy round here.

        Meanwhile someone like my Dad is watched like a hawk because he provided Shoji blinds to the Embassy – and home – they flew him to European mainland country, for an Ambassador to the Court of St James in London (along with other mega-rich) and is hassled to within an inch of his life to account for the last penny. *Sheesh*.

        So in our three person household, Labour became toxic: by me because they’re just Tory-lite and using alphabet stuff and talk about a national credit card, by Dad because they make manufacturing more difficult, and by mum because the winter fuel allowance debacle etc. Well done Labour MP for Gedling, Michale Payne! You turned three previous Labour voters against you and we will NEVER come back.

        Reply
  2. The Rev Kev

    In a way it kinda all makes sense. For twenty years the international money laundering machine was Afghanistan but the Taliban ended that party. Then for the past three years that operation moved to the Ukraine and it has been amazing but it looks like Putin is going to spoil this one. With a need for a base for it, I guess that Milie is stepping up to the plate and telling the international community to set it up in Argentina. Bonus points as there is no war to spoil things. I remember how some of the biggest banks in America were busted for washing drug cartel money for which they got a firm slap on the back of their hands I can tell you. But now they can do it all legally in Argentina and DC is giving it all the nod. Some of the “treasure islands” may lose a bit of money to Argentina too. But if I were an Argentinian with money under my mattress, I would not be running off to the banks to deposit it there. It’s safety would all depend on a Milie promise which is worth zip.

    Reply
  3. Wukchumni

    Argentina is about the last place you’d want to money launder unless you were using Quarters @ a laundromat in Buenos Aires.

    They have an unblemished record of not being good with money for many decades of monetary malfeasance~

    Reply
  4. Tom B.

    Ingenius plan? I thought the title might be an example of ingenious wordplay, but the text does not support this.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *