Curtis Yarvin’s Dystopian Plan for “Gaza Inc.” Closer With Proposed Stablecoin

The future of Gaza is becoming clearer, and it is shaping into a dystopian model: technocratic governance, a population managed through biometric surveillance and stablecoins, and oversight by a supranational private entity that profits from it. Welcome to the future.

This scenario is not hyperbole; it is the plan proposed by Trump’s Board of Peace, which strangely resembles Curtis Yarvin’s proposal to turn the enclave into “Gaza Inc.” Yarvin says he never shared his proposal with the President—which is probably true—and attributes the similarities to them “inhabiting the same reality,” which speaks volumes about what that reality entails. His vision is explicit: “the first charter city backed by US legitimacy: Gaza, Inc. Stock symbol: GAZA.”

His outlandish idea is to make Gaza a publicly listed company through an initial public offering (IPO), which he says could raise a trillion dollars and pay off Gaza residents through shares, but only by forcing them to leave. “You don’t get any special treatment in Starbucks stores for being an SBUX holder,” he notes by way of comparison.

Short of formally listing Gaza on a stock exchange and forcibly displacing two million people—at least so far—the Trump Board of Peace appears to be following a similar script. During a transition period, governance would fall to the National Committee for Gaza Management (NGAC), a board of Palestinian technocrats.

The concept borrows legitimacy from intra-Palestinian discussions in 2024 about Hamas transferring administrative control, but the resemblance ends there. The NGAC lacks local legitimacy because it would operate under a UN resolution mandated by the Board of Peace and remain subordinate to the Gaza Executive Board.

That board includes figures such as Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner, Tony Blair, Marc Rowan, Yakir Gabay, Hakan Fidan, and representatives from Egypt, Qatar, and the UAE. Its role is to oversee the NGAC and manage reconstruction. Above it sits the Board of Peace Executive Board, tasked with advancing this Trumpian initiative—which has already been ratified by 60 countries.

However, as we noted in a previous article after the signing ceremony in Davos, its structure is designed as a potential financial vehicle shielded by diplomatic immunity; its charter makes it similar to a multinational corporation but with diplomatic status and sovereignty.

Under this layered architecture, Gaza effectively becomes a fiefdom administered by Trump and his associates. It stops short of becoming a private corporation, as Yarvin proposed, but functions in a manner reminiscent of Western colonial trading companies. Kushner himself hinted at this logic when he described Gaza’s “waterfront property” as “very valuable” if Israel “moved the people out” and cleaned it up.

That logic now appears operational. At Davos this year, Kushner outlined plans to transform Gaza into a coastal tourism destination, transportation hub, and center for digital infrastructure. The last point may be the most consequential.

According to the Financial Times, the Executive Board of Peace is preparing to launch a dollar-pegged stablecoin to “jump-start the Gaza economy.” Another source told the FT that the aim is also to “dry Gaza of cash so that Hamas can’t generate any.” Pegging the coin to the dollar means backing it with US Treasuries.

The stablecoin could channel the estimated $70 billion needed for reconstruction, according to the UN, and finance Kushner’s $25 billion plan. It is not yet Yarvin’s IPO, but it shares the same financialization logic. And, no less significant, Gaza could become a holder of US debt on par with established sovereign actors such as Germany or Israel.

The human rights organization Euromed has condemned the proposal as “an emerging instrument of silent genocide in Gaza.” No wonder, since the man behind the idea is Liran Tancman, a former Israeli Intelligence Corps official, co-founder of the Israeli Cyber Command, and co-founder of the infamous GHF. The text reads like a warning to us all, beyond Gaza:

“This would change access to money and basic transactions from a fundamental right into a revocable privilege, making food, medicine, and shelter dependent on security decisions and military assessments. It reflects a coercive restructuring of daily life aimed at pushing the population toward poverty and displacement, managed through technology,” states the report.

Technocratic governance. A stablecoin. Digital infrastructure. Yet one small obstacle remains before turning this “beautiful piece of property,” in the words of the U.S. president, into the “Riviera of the Middle East”: two million people. Here enter the plans for Gaza residential zones.

Leaked documents obtained by Dropsite detail a Civil-Military Coordination Center (CMCC) plan—an entity dependent on the U.S. Central Command, established after the so-called ceasefire—to relocate Palestinians into areas fully controlled by Israel. The irony is not lost in the name “Alternative Safe Communities.”

According to the CENTCOM proposal, these zones would “contain and control their residents through biometric surveillance, checkpoints, monitoring of purchases, and educational programs promoting normalization with Israel.” Because, despite what Yarvin thinks, you cannot have an earthly dystopian paradise without slave to do the hardwork.

It is unclear how much of the population of Gaza remains alive or how many would want to remain in Gaza under the present or the outlined circumstances. However, what seems clear is that the “Riviera of the Middle East” would not be built for them. So, for whom would this place be?

The immediate beneficiaries are obvious: the Board of Peace and its appointees, who would exercise executive power over reconstruction and land management.

However, if all the elements mentioned above fit into place—which is difficult but not impossible—the implications extend far beyond Gaza. Under the Board of Peace, with diplomatic immunity and freed from conventional state control, Gaza could become a new financial paradise for the coming multipolar world and a Middle Eastern hub for digital infrastructure. It would be the ideal place for U.S. and other Western or allied companies to be based, as well as their executives, strategically located and protected by Israel. It would be the first fully native-digital surveillance society built from scratch—and a model for others.

After all, that seems to be the prototype that the Board of Peace wants to export.