Michael Hudson: US Economy is Based on a Ponzi Scheme

Yves here. In a talk with Ben Norton, Michael Hudson discusses how borrowing in the US has increasingly served to fund speculation in assets, as opposed to productive investment, with one of the perverse results that companies buy back stock and offshore/outsource activities as opposed to invest in the business of their business. We discussed this ultimately Ponzi-like activity early on, in a 2005 article in the Conference Board Review, The Incredible Shrinking Corporation.

The discussion below looks at how post-crisis policies turbo-charged this sorry tendency and provides current data on some of its effects, such as an acceleration of the rise in wealth inequality.

However, a small quibble: Hudson describes the sources of investment capital as retained earnings and stock issuance. In fact, in order of importance, they are retained earnings, borrowings, and equity sales. But borrowing is pretty much not the old-fashioned bank loan for general corporate purposes. Small business might borrow against real estate, receivables, equipment or use personal borrowings by the owner (credit cards or personal lines of credit). Bigger businesses can issue corporate bonds or sell commercial paper.

Originally published at Geopolitical Economy Hour

Is another financial crisis brewing in the US economy? Economist Michael Hudson explains the dangers.” Reports suggest the US economy may be on the verge of another financial crisis, with major problems in the $3 trillion private credit market.

There are growing signs that the United States may be on the verge of another major financial crisis, one that could start in the private credit market, which is already seeing significant turmoil, before spreading to other sectors.

Geopolitical Economy Report editor Ben Norton interviewed economist Michael Hudson to discuss the serious problems on Wall Street. Hudson warned that the US economy is built on a Ponzi scheme that depends on continuing to pour money into a bloated, bubbly financial system based on unsustainable speculation, not industrial production.

BEN NORTON: There are more and more signs that we may be on the precipice of another major financial crisis.

The former CEO of the Wall Street bank Goldman Sachs warned in an interview on Bloomberg that he can smell another financial crisis on the horizon. Where exactly could this crisis come from? Well, some financial analysts are worried about the private credit industry in the US.

This has exploded in recent years, because after the 2008 crash, banks were more heavily regulated. So more and more firms on Wall Street began to lend to private companies, and the private credit industry ballooned.

It is now a $3 trillion industry, yet it is not regulated. And many of these private credit firms have given bad loans to bad companies that are now defaulting.

We published a short video explaining the issue with the private credit industry and the fears of a new financial crisis. However, that video is just a brief introduction to the problem.

I thought it would be important to go into further detail explaining the very real danger here. And I thought the perfect guest to interview to help us understand this would be the economist Michael Hudson.

Michael is the author of many books, including Killing the Host: How Financial Parasites and Debt Destroy the Global Economy.

BEN NORTON: Michael, thanks for joining us today. It’s always a pleasure having you.

Let’s talk about the real possibility of a new financial crisis. If you read financial media outlets like Bloomberg and the Financial Times, they have been warning a lot recently of the possibility of a new financial crisis.

It could potentially start in the private credit industry, which is seeing all of these problems and rising default rates. And it could spread; this could be contagion that spreads through the banking sector and other industries.

Then you also have the AI bubble, and the war in Iran, and the energy shock. There is so much we’re going to talk about today. But let’s just start by talking about this crisis. Do you think we could be on the verge of another major financial crash?

MICHAEL HUDSON: Yes, the whole problem stems exactly from 2008 or more particularly, 2009, when President Obama took office. His solution to the junk mortgage crisis, the bank fraud crisis, was to turn the economy into a Ponzi scheme.

He needed to bail out the banks. The banks had made so many fraudulent and bad loans, that exceeded the ability of these banks to collect on their high-interest, junk mortgages that had been given, that the major banking companies were in negative equity.

What was the solution? The solution was a zero interest-rate policy, ZIRP. The Federal Reserve lowered interest rates from the high crisis levels in 2008 and 2009 way down to 0.1%, which is what banks could borrow for.

The Federal Reserve was able to create electronic money on its computers to lend to the banks at a very low interest rates and said, “Well, banks, you have as much money as you want, at 0.1%, that we are providing you to lend out to the economy, to support the price of real estate, stocks, and bonds, so that we will restore the negative equity that the reckless banking sector has created”.

Well, the result is that the banks did two things.

One, they could simply leave the 0. 1% money they borrowed with the Federal Reserve, and make a few percentage points for nothing, in their sleep, by just leaving it with the Federal Reserve, because the Federal Reserve said, in effect: “Our job is to transfer money from the private economy into the banking sector, to rescue the financial sector, because that’s what central banks do; we represent the commercial banks”.

“So we’re going to begin paying interest on the bank reserves”, which the Fed hadn’t done before. “But, all the rest of the money, we want you to lend out to the economy, to make as much interest rate margin, the increase in what you charge to borrowers over what you can borrow, the cost of your borrowing from us, which is almost nothing”.

Well, the banks weren’t set up to evaluate loans to particular companies. They usually make money on collateral being pledged for their loans. Bank credit isn’t extended, in the United States or Britain, to finance industrial capital investment. That’s the job of the stock market, if anything, or of companies to reinvest their earnings.

Banks lend money for assets, real estate, stocks, and bonds, already issued, already in existence. So they lend money out to intermediaries, saying, “You do the job; you find the companies to take over”.

You then begin to have private capital take over companies and make money by essentially looting them. Thames Water in England is typical of how you loot a company. Hospitals, for instance, were a target of these private equity companies. They would go to a hospital saying, “We’ll sell off your real estate, to a separate entity. Then you agree to use the capital gain, the money that you make selling the real estate, to pay a special dividend. And now, instead of owning the real estate, you will now be paying rent on a long-term lease for the real estate. And we’ll lend you the money for this, and you’ll be paying us credit, management fees, late fee penalties”.

The result is that a lot of hospitals went bankrupt. Private equity proceeded to bankrupt whole swaths of the American economy. A new word was added to the English language: enshittification — just cutting back the quality of what companies were doing, slashing expenses, working labor harder, making them work overtime, cutting.

When there was an attrition of the labor force, when workers left, you let the remaining workers pick up all of the slack. Productivity went up. So you had an extractive, predatory financial system in the United States.

Meanwhile, this predatory financial system was making so many gains for the companies that were financialized and using their profits not to invest in new capital formation and new factories and means of production; all of that was done abroad; it was sent to China and other Asian countries.

92-94%, of corporate cash flow profits and all the surplus they had was spent either on dividend payouts or buying their own stocks. So you had companies creating the stock market boom by buying their own stocks back, to push up the price, so that the earnings they had would be spread over a shrinking and shrinking number of shares, making the illusion of increasing earnings per share.

The earnings weren’t really earned. When you make money in your sleep, it’s not earned; it’s economic rent, meaning unearned capital that you make in predatory ways.

So the financial system has been turned into a predatory system. And all of this enormous growth in financial wealth since 2009 has accrued to the financial and real estate sector, dominated by the wealthiest 10% of the population.

40% of the American population doesn’t have any savings at all. They’re living on the brink.

And now the costs are going up. They’re having to fall further and further behind on their credit card debt, their personal debt, their automobile debt, student loans especially. So they’re not able to pay. And the bottom 60-80% finds itself hardly increased at all. What used to be the middle class isn’t really in the middle anymore.

It turns out the middle-class people are wage earners, just like the blue-collar earners. They have to pay rising costs for either for rent or for their mortgages to buy homes, whose price is inflated by the low interest rates that enable a larger and larger debt to be created on the basis of these low interest rates.

Well, now that interest rates are going up, you can imagine the cost squeeze.

There’s a huge wave of defaults happening all the way from consumers — that’s polite word for wage earners, in America — to corporations that are being squeezed. Tthis is all part of the backwash that — being a Ponzi scheme, essentially, the way that you enable the economy to keep paying its debts if you lend the debtor the money to pay the interest.

That’s what credit card holders do. They will send in the payment, a monthly payment due on their credit cards, and their credit card debt is going to go up and up and up, and with it their monthly payments. But as long as the credit card companies will lend to the consumers the money, the credit, to remain current on their obligations and not have to pay penalty fees, then you’re going to be able to keep the Ponzi scheme going.

A Ponzi scheme is one that needs more and more money paid into it to keep the exponential growth rate growing.

The same thing happens for corporations. As corporate sales fall off, as labor squeezed — if, in the United States, wage earners have to spend more money on gasoline, on electricity prices that are going up, partly as a result of gas prices, on all of these monopolized expenses, then they’re going to have less and less money to spend on the goods that they produce.

That means that companies that produce goods and services for sale in the United States are going to have lower sales, and lower profits out of which to pay the rising debt and the interest on their carrying charges that they are mounting up, and that are being increased as the economy is pushed into financial crisis, as a result of the move to a war economy. It means that there are going to be layoffs, that companies are going to be closing down.

Farmers cannot afford to do farming anymore. Chemical companies cannot afford to produce what they were producing before. Electric companies cannot afford to pay the higher prices for their gas, or oil, without regulatory agencies increasing their electric rates. And that means that firms using electricity are going to have to close down their offices.

We’re in for the equivalent of what was the Great Depression. And depressions are not inflationary. They’re deflationary. That’s what nobody seems to get.

They think, “Oh, if interest rates go up, then a wealthy people who have a bond are not going to be able to buy as many goods and services as they could. And we have to stabilize the purchasing power of their credit by lowering the purchasing power of labor”. The economy is to be sacrificed to the financial sector. That’s what neoliberalism is all about. That’s what finance capitalism is all about, and what makes it so different from industrial capitalism.

We’re in a post-industrial society, and that’s a financial society run by the banks, through their control of the central banks, which are controlled by the government, [which is run by politicians] whose campaigns are financed by contributors from the finance and the real estate sector.

So it’s all sort of a self-feeding circular flow. And Ponzi schemes always end in a crash. That’s what’s leading other investors to try to withdraw from the American and European economies. But where can they withdraw to? That’s the problem. What can they do?

BEN NORTON: Yeah, I’d like to talk about the US government’s response, or lack of response to all of this. Because we’ve seen that the Trump administration has been completely in bed with the finance industry.

One of the biggest donors to Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign was the highest paid corporate executive on Wall Street, Stephen Schwarzman, the CEO of Blackstone, which is the largest alternative asset manager in the world. And Blackstone has a massive private equity arm.

And Trump’s friends and donors on Wall Street pressured him to sign an executive order in August 2025 that is so cynical. It is titled “Democratizing Access to Alternative Assets for 401(K) Investors”. And it makes it seem like this is something that is helping average workers who are saving for their retirement and their 401(K) plan.

But in reality, what this was was an attempt by Wall Street to provide exit liquidity, and dump these horrible, toxic assets on average people. Because it was very clear on Wall Street, you know, in the months leading up to this crisis, everyone could see that there was there were so many bad loans that had been made by these private credit and private equity funds, and they were looking for someone to hold the bag.

So Trump comes in and says, “Oh, we’re going to ‘democratize’ access”.

And there are reports that some of these financial firms are actually paying wealth managers, and they’re paying financial advisors, to pressure average people to invest in some private credit fund, saying, “Look, you can get 10% per year on this fund”. And supposedly it’s not risky.

I mean, there are so many similarities to what happened with the collateralized debt obligations, the CDOs, that just bundled together all of these mortgage-backed securities in the lead up to the 2007-2008 financial crisis. Back then, credit rating agencies said these MBS and CDOs were great, they were risk free, they were AAA rated. And obviously it was all junk.

And what we see today with the widespread use of some of these apps, like for instance Robinhood, there are a lot of average people, especially young men, who are basically just gambling their savings away and trying to engage in risky derivatives. Some of them have been buying up ETFs of some of these private credit funds.

Basically, the more sophisticated financial analysts and firms on Wall Street are just trying to dump all of this stuff on average people. And what’s so disgusting is that the white House was facilitating this in the lead-up to this crisis that a lot of people could see coming.

How do you how do you see it?

MICHAEL HUDSON: Well, that’s exactly what has been happening, Ben.

When an investment firm deals with an investor — primarily what you call average people are largely pension funds. We’re having pension-fund capitalism being used to bail out the Ponzi scheme.

In other words, when a company sees an investor or a fund manager come in, what do they think? “How can I make money off these people?”

Well, right now, the wealthiest funds, like Blackstone, think, “It’s now how can we make money; we know that we’re entering a depression period where we can’t make money, really. There’s not going to be much more to be made. The market has gone as high as it can be”.

“But what we can do is minimize the losses. What we want to do is avoid making a loss. But there are going to be losses. What do we do? Let’s make labor pay for them. Let’s turn the economy of pension-fund managers and the average people into suckers — the suckers who bought Donald Trump’s cryptocurrency [coin] and the Melania [coin], you know, that went up to a huge amount, and then collapsed 95%.

Donald Trump had a company that made Donald Trump watches — and, you know, you talked about lowering the consumer prices, which he promised to do — the watches that were sold, at huge prices, like maybe $10,000, the price for Donald Trump watches has fallen 95%. Talk about lowering prices for consumers!

A         ll of these were con games. The financial system has been turned into a confidence game, of how do you get American consumers to have the confidence to be willing to risk their money in a Wall Street casino where the casino always wins, and the players lose on balance, because that’s why they created the casinos in the first place. That’s the game.

Well, Wall Street is that kind of a consumer game. If you can convince people, “Look at the high interest you’re making”, you’ll ignore the fact that you’re going to lose your capital. Yes, you’ll make 10% interest, and then lose all of the money that you’ve [invested].

When I was in Russia in 1994, you know, taking the subway, I’d say all of these advertisements along the subway, saying, “You can make 33% on your savings by putting the money in such and such a bank”. It was all a huge scam. Albania had, I think, the leading type scam. The whole economy, the consumers, the largest single investment by consumers and savers were in basically a Ponzi scheme. That was all wiped out.

So what we’re seeing is the Albanian-ization of the American economy. It’ll sort of look like Russia under Yeltsin.

You’re guaranteed to lose your capital, but if you can only think, tunnel vision for the short term, then you’ll think, “Well, I made 10% for a while”. That’s the policy.

Pension-fund capitalism was always an attempt to withhold wages to provide to the financial sector, the financialized pension systems, instead of a pay-as-you-go system, or instead of a public pension system.

So the whole way in which the American pensions have been financialized, and American savings have been financialized, by predatory private capital firms is exploitative from the beginning. That’s the model. Create a bubble, sell it the top, and then sell all of the assets, and stocks, and bonds, and other financial claims, that were your assets, sell them to labor, sell them to the pension funds.

Tell them that this is the way to save the economy, and to get rich themselves, to get rich in the short run, by losing all your money in the medium term. That’s what happens in a crisis.

BEN NORTON: Yeah, very well said, Michael.

I want to talk about the situation overall in the US economy, because, we’re seeing the energy crisis due to this US war of aggression in Iran causing oil prices to skyrocket. And now we’re seeing this crisis in private credit.

Well, we’ve also seen several other major problems with the US economy recently.

You may have seen this chart going around that shows that now the richest 10% of Americans make up half of the spending in the economy. And of course, the US economy is deindustrialized, and driven largely by consumption.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

18 comments

  1. Carolinian

    Article seems to be cut off but the rest available here.

    https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2026/04/21/private-credit-financial-crisis-us-economy-michael-hudson/

    As for Stephen Schwarzman he must be a great guy since they named the famous NYC central library after him.

    https://ilsr.org/articles/ny-public-library-trades-naming-rights-greedy-hedge-fund-billionaire-big-bucks/

    Similarly physician Matt Bivens has been doing a series on the opioid crisis led by the Sackler crime family who got the Metropolitan Museum to name an entire wing after them

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackler_Wing

    They steal us blind and then fund monuments to themselves. What a world.

  2. flora

    Thanks for this article. Per your intro comments:
    ” Michael Hudson discusses how borrowing in the US has increasingly served to fund speculation in assets, as opposed to productive investment, with one of the perverse results that companies buy back stock and offshore/outsource activities as opposed to invest in the business of their business. ”

    This has everything to do with changes in US tax law that made this profitable. Once upon a time, in the bad old days of the mid-20th century, such activity was either illegal or taxed at a very, very high rate to keep manufacturing investments here onshore, to increase investments in productive activities, and to keep owners and CEOs and BoDs from looting the companies.

    When tax laws were changed to favor looting and offshoring the monetary “incentives” changed. / my 2 cents

    1. JonnyJames

      I agree, the tax law “reforms” further incentivized offshoring and de-industrialization. De-regulation, under the guise of “reforms” and “modernization” in order to make fraud and manipulation “legal”. (Orwellian-named Financial Services Modernization Act, Commodity Futures Modernization Act) At around the same time, we had SCOTUS decisions that made illegal political bribery, legal (Citizens United). Much of the corruption has become formalized, normalized and institutionalized.

      This also relates to your reply about the junk bonds. It’s mind-boggling how criminality becomes normal and accepted behavior, while the perps make a killing and project their crimes on others. High crime does indeed pay, and it pays highly.

      Hudson makes a good point about equating Nuclear Winter with Financial Winter: these freaks are going to get a lot more people killed one way, or the other.

    2. skippy

      Bonus points for naming the Prez that lowered taxes from 70%-ish too 20%-ish and soul-ed the idea of a social security tax as a master stroke economic plan ….

      1. JonnyJames

        Or rather which faction of the uniparty had majorities in Congress when they passed the legislation?

  3. Mr Kloop

    The Rest of the World is eagerly waiting for the great US Ponzi Scheme to come tumbling down. Maybe we can then live in peace without the US.

  4. JonnyJames

    Another great post from the great prof. Hudson. I think Ben does a good job interviewing as well, thanks for posting this.

    However, a small quibble: Hudson describes the sources of investment capital as retained earnings and stock issuance. In fact, in order of importance, they are retained earnings, borrowings, and equity sales. But borrowing is pretty much not the old-fashioned bank loan for general corporate purposes. Small business might borrow against real estate, receivables, equipment or use personal borrowings by the owner (credit cards or personal lines of credit). Bigger businesses can issue corporate bonds or sell commercial paper.

    I may have missed something, but if I understand this correctly, the quibble may be a small misunderstanding as I have read and heard of Michael addressing these issues especially borrowing and debt.

    1. flora

      An aside: There are regular corporate bonds and then there are “bonds”: junk bonds, CDO’s, etc. See the book The Predators’ Ball about the rise of junk bonds and the junk bond king Michael Milken, and what happened to his firm Drexel Burnham Lambert. (No, not NC’s Lambert. / ;)

      1. flora

        All done or excused in the neoliberal, lovely sounding, rallying cry: “Shareholder interest!” (Makes it sound kinda greater-good populist, which it wasn’t. /;)

        1. flora

          adding: and going on too long, funny how moving executive pay to include large bundles of stock options, which was sold as better “aligning the CEOs interest with the company’s interest”, did just the opposite, imo. It aligned the CEO’s interest with jacking up the stock price irrespective of how said ‘jacking’ might affect the long term interest and viability of the company.

          The Wall St. CEO’s rallying cry became the short term “I got mine!” Yes, you did, and in the process destroyed Sears, Pennys, Sunbeam, Westinghouse Electric, and many other once profitable, long term and good businesses. Chainsaw Al Dunlap was the poster boy for that era.

          End rant. / ;)

          1. Rolf

            Ah yes, I remember Chainsaw Al, who finally got his due, sort of, revealed as an utter fraud and shyster. Sort of like our Toy President. From Wikipedia,

            Dunlap is on the lists of “Worst CEOs of All Time” published by several business publications. Fast Company noted that Dunlap “might score impressively on the Corporate Psychopathy checklist” and in an interview, Dunlap freely admitted to possessing many of the traits of a psychopath, but considered them positive traits such as leadership and decisiveness.

            1. skippy

              Some Economic Libertarian/Austrian, right here, on NC back in the day, after a bit of a debate with him, opined that – WE – need such people to move humanity forward – full stop. Seems any sort of altruism or notion of society is a *** very bad thing *** as it impedes markets/price discovery and akin to gravity going poof and we all die.

              Back in those days it was a rare omission, otherwise it would be some out of hole cloth rhetoric dressed up as Logic[tm]. Seems these days those sorts are embolden by all the money thrown at them by financial elitists and years of grooming generations. All of which begs the question …. who is next after Trumpo … whilst vast swaths of the unwashed are subjugated by the velvet leash of their 401K or Work/ACA health insurance plans.

  5. nyleta

    Another strange 2 yr to 3 yr Treasury buyback result, only 10 % of what they proposed was accepted. The last time at these dates was short as well but not this short. Is it because they expect rates to drop or is it because losses due to inflation induced rate hikes will be less in these maturities ?

  6. Skip Intro

    I fear Hudson has confused ‘enshittification’ with ‘crapification’. The latter is the endless cutting of corners at the cost of product quality. The former, to paraphrase Cory Doctorow, is a more of a service-economy parallel, that arises as a company transitions from a popular service or software product for customers, to a system for locking in revenue streams, which fundamentally undermines the service.

  7. mohookoo

    Thank God for Prof Hudson.

    Just yesterday from The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2026/apr/23/savvy-squirrel-advertising-uk-investment-business

    RED ALERT for all the “little guys” in the UK: if you have £10,000 in savings then you are being targeted for fleecing.

    “Chris Cummings, the chief executive of the Investment Association lobby group, which is steering the campaign, said: “Every year since the global financial crisis, we’ve had more well-intentioned regulation that has come in that has been designed to offer consumer protection.

    “But where we’ve ended up is protecting people out of capital markets, and that’s why we’ve got this.””

    “Protecting people out of capital markets” ?? What naked Thatcherite shark-talk is this?

    And what does the government say? Exactly the same:
    “The City minister Lucy Rigby, who is launching the new retail investment campaign alongside Reeves at the London Stock Exchange on Thursday, said: “With greater awareness of the benefits of investing, more people will be able to make informed decisions about how to make their savings work harder for them.

    “That will mean greater prosperity and financial resilience for households across the country and strengthened domestic capital markets too.””

    “….more people will be able to make informed decisions about how to make their savings work harder for them.”

    Now, where have we heard that before? Was the pensions mis-selling scandal so long ago that these partners-in-crime think that the victims will surely have forgotten?

    “Savvy Shark” would have been the truthful name.

    Col Smithers, give us the dirt on how this conspiracy was planned, and name the names. Please! Even though, sadly, it will make no difference…..

Comments are closed.