Conor here: Bad news for Europe. Good news for American LNG exporters. From Reuters:
Asia’s imports of U.S. LNG are expected to reach a record high of 4.23 million tons in July, about three times the 1.34 million tons from February. Asia’s demand for U.S. LNG has meant that Europe has seen its imports from its top supplier drop, with Kpler tracking arrivals of just 3.94 million tons for July, down from a recent peak of 7.79 million in January and the lowest since November 2024.
The switching of U.S. cargoes to Asia has resulted in Europe’s total LNG imports falling to an expected 6.90 million tons in July, the lowest since September 2024 and down from 8.72 million tons in July 2025.
The drop in LNG imports comes as Europe’s refilling of natural gas inventories falls well behind schedule, with data from energy analyst John Kemp showing a storage deficit of 158 terawatt hours by July 7, about 22% wider than the 10-year seasonal average.
This means that European utilities are likely going to have to bid up spot LNG prices to levels that knock Asian buyers such as China and India out of the market. It also means the longer Qatar’s LNG remains effectively unavailable amid the Iran conflict, the more likely spot prices will climb.
And so European nations have turned to Russia’s Yamal LNG plant, absorbing almost the entire output of the Siberian facility during the first half of 2026, but such imports will be banned by the EU come January 1. More fun times ahead.
By Tsvetana Paraskova, an energy and commodities journalist who has contributed to Oilprice.com for nearly a decade, covering global energy markets, commodities, and the geopolitical and economic developments shaping supply and demand. Originally published at OilPrice.
- Europe’s heatwave is disrupting energy and transport, with low river levels restricting barge traffic on the Rhine and driving up shipping costs for fuel, coal, and other goods.
- High river temperatures have forced France to cut nuclear power generation, reducing electricity output as reactors face cooling constraints.
- The extreme weather is adding to Europe’s energy challenges, increasing inflationary pressures and threatening economic growth alongside ongoing disruptions from the Strait of Hormuz crisis.
The intense early summer heatwave in Europe is warming the biggest rivers and drying up their water levels, disrupting energy deliveries, power generation, and key supply chain routes.
The heatwaves in Europe started as early as June, with record-breaking temperatures for weeks on end in Europe’s biggest economies, Germany and France.
As a result, rainfall was severely limited, and key inland transportation river routes were affected by navigation restrictions, with curbs on the freight volumes a barge can ship. This, in turn, has raised shipping costs and added additional strains to the economies at a time when the protracted Strait of Hormuz crisis is already hiking Europe’s energy costs and inflation.
On top of economic and inflationary effects in Germany, the heatwave actually curbed electricity supply in France.
Early this week, France’s nuclear power generation was slashed by 6.4 gigawatts (GW), or about 14% of the country’s total power demand for the day, amid the heatwave that hiked river temperatures and limited the ability of the nuclear power plants to use the water to cool reactors.
This is not the first time France has had to curb output at reactors and limit nuclear power production due to high summer temperatures.
France still exported electricity to its neighbors despite reduced nuclear power output, but these events appear to be becoming more frequent as heatwaves last longer with more extreme temperatures.
The same goes for disruption to shipping on the 800-mile-long Rhine River, the biggest inland shipping corridor in Europe, which is critically important for Germany’s and central Europe’s supply of coal, diesel, and goods.
The Rhine handles an enormous amount of supplies for Europe, including fuel and coal, adding to supply chain issues that the Hormuz crisis has created for sea routes.
The Rhine River, which runs northwest from Switzerland through Germany, France, and the Netherlands into the North Sea, is a major petroleum product transportation corridor in Europe. Due to the heatwaves and drought, the levels on the river are low and have now become too shallow for many barges shipping petroleum products to pass. Barges are not being fully loaded to keep them lighter on the water, which lifts shipping costs and delays shipments of coal, fuels, and other goods.
The Kaub gauge, on the Middle Rhine between Koblenz and Mainz, sits at the shallowest chokepoint on the river. It sets the maximum draft and, therefore, the laden weight for every barge moving between the Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp ARA seaports and the industrial hinterland of the Rhine valley, shared by Germany, France, and Switzerland.
The previous major crisis with low Rhine water levels was in 2022, and in 2018 before that.
The 2022 critically low Rhine levels occurred when the first energy crisis hit Europe and its economy after the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
This summer, the low Rhine level due to scarce rainfall and intense heatwaves coincides with the Middle East crisis to mount additional pressure on industry, energy supply and prices, transportation costs, and ultimately, inflation.
Water level at the Kaub chokepoint is now at its lowest level in decades for mid-July, which has hiked the freight cost to ship diesel from Rotterdam to southern Germany by more than 50% in the past week.
The early heatwaves and low river levels could pressure Germany’s industry and economy, which has just managed to shake off the initial shock from the Middle East crisis.
Back in 2018, the low Rhine levels in November 2018 led to a 1.5% decline in Germany’s industrial production, which in turn lowered Germany’s GDP by 0.4%, according to the Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
This year, the end-June heatwave cost the German economy more than $6.8 billion, or 6 billion euros, an exclusive analysis by economic research firm Prognos for German business daily Handelsblatt showed this week.
In the future, Germany could see three or four intense heatwaves each summer with temperatures exceeding 35 C, or 95 F. Prognos has estimated that Germany could lose 1 billion euros, or $1.14 billion, on each day in which temperatures exceed 35 C. Thus, the annual damage to the German economy could top 20 billion euros, or $23 billion.


Climate change has an actual financial cost to economies. Hilarity ensues in national governments as they exercise their moral stupidity. Only if you like black comedy.
Adding a clarification.
France is reducing the intake of rivierwater for their powerplants due to environmental reasons. The plants can operate with higher temperatures of the water used for cooling.
Life in the rivers can’t handle the even higher temperature of the water once it has been used for cooling
I agree that the current limit is based on ‘Environmental’ considerations regarding wildlife.
But the heat flow rate for the cooling water is mass flow x Coefficient x Temperate Delta (Gradient). So if the temperatures climb then your cooling system becomes closer and closer to it’s maximum design load for coolant mass flow rate (ie how much water it can move in a given unit of time).
Obviously this can be upgraded but that requires time, paperwork and money. It’s a real indication that we are outside of ‘what the designers considered normal temperatures’.
The same way that my city’s sewer systems could not keep up with a recent rainstorm event that was double the previous record for daily rainfall … thousands of basements were flooded. The people who designed the sewer for an ‘extreme’ event defined extreme as much less than mother nature could in fact deliver.
The EU would be better off banning LNG and going back to coal, if they want to slow down the heating of the planet.
Huh?
Some studies have argued that under-reported upstream methane leaks from shale fracking, combined with ocean transport emissions, make LNG’s total greenhouse gas footprint worse than coal even though the smokestack emissions are far less.
An interesting line of pursuit, as fossil fuel consumption returns carbon captured millions, many millions of years ago, to the biosphere today.
Homo Sapiens has accomplished this much.
Of course all our other pursuits entertain us, but time will tell for future generations.
I guess it wasn’t such a genius idea to acquiesce to/participate in the blowing up of Nordstream, but who could have possibly imagined it would have such bad consequences for the Europeans?
I cannot add the tags such as sarcasm, irony, and blob; I agree it is bad.
Will Europe really stop importing Russian LNG next year, I wonder?