Here’s What a Real Strike Looks Like: 150 Million Say No to Despotism in India

Yves here. Even though the gilet jaunes are getting a lot of interest due to the vivid images of damage to Paris, other important protests for labor and against inequality are being neglected by the Western media. One is against anti-labor “reforms” in India.

By  Vijay Prashad, an Indian historian, editor and journalist. He is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at Globetrotter, a project of the Independent Media Institute. He is the chief editor of LeftWord Books and the director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. He has written more than twenty books, including The Darker Nations: A People’s History of the Third World (The New Press, 2007), The Poorer Nations: A Possible History of the Global South (Verso, 2013), The Death of the Nation and the Future of the Arab Revolution (University of California Press, 2016) and Red Star Over the Third World (LeftWord, 2017). He writes regularly for Frontline, the Hindu, Newsclick, AlterNet and BirGün. Originally produced by Globetrotter a project of the Independent Media Institute.

Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.Indian cities never go silent. Sound is a constant feature—the horns of cars, the chirping of birds, the cries of hawkers, the steady hum of a motorcycle engine. On Tuesday, India is on strike. It is likely that about 150 million workers will stay away from their workplaces. Trade unions of the Left have called for the strike, a general strike in a country exhausted by rising inequality and a mood of dissatisfaction.

The streets of Kerala—a state governed by the Left Democratic Front—are not quiet. Cars and motorcycles go their way. But the roads are quieter. Public transport is off the road, because the transport unions are behind the strike. Thiruvananthapuram sounds like it did about 20 years ago, when traffic was lighter and when the city was calmer. But there is nothing calm in the atmosphere. Workers are angry. The government in Delhi continues to betray them.

Largest Strike in World History

Strikes of this scale are not unusual in India. The largest recorded strike in world history took place in India in 2016, when 180 million workers protested the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The demands of this strike are—as usual—many, but they center around the deterioration of the livelihood of workers, around the demise of work itself for many people and around the political attack on unions.

Modi’s government is eager to amend the trade unions laws. Tapan Sen, the leader of the Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU), said that the new trade union laws would essentially lead to the enslavement of Indian workers. These are strong words. But they are not unbelievable.


Since India won independence in 1947, it has pursued a “mixed” path of national development. Important sections of the economy remained in government hands, with public sector firms formed to deliver essential industrial goods to enhance the development goals of the country. The agricultural sector was also organized so that the government provided credit to farmers at subsidized rates and the government set procurement prices to ensure that farmers continued to grow essential food crops.

All this changed in 1991, when the government began to “liberalize” the economy, privatize the public sector, reduce its role in the agricultural market and welcome foreign investment. Growth was now premised on the rate of return on financial investment and not on the investment in people and their futures. The new policy orientation—liberalization—has grown the middle class and earned the wealthy fabulous amounts of money. But it has also created an agrarian crisis and produced a precarious situation for workers.

Demoralize the Workers

The government, since 1991, knew that it was not enough to privatize the public sector and to sell off precious public assets to private hands. It had to do two more things.

First, it had to make sure that public sector enterprises would fail and would then lose legitimacy. The government starved these public sector firms of funds and watched them swing in the wind. Without investment, these firms were unable to make improvements and so began to deteriorate. Their demise validated the argument of liberalization, although their demise had been manufactured by an investment strike.

Second, the government pushed to break trade union power by using the courts to undermine the right to strike and by using the legislature to amend the trade union laws. Weaker unions would mean demoralized workers, which would mean that workers would now be utterly at the mercy of the private firms.

Right to Strike

This strike, like the 17 before it, is about livelihood issues and about the right to strike. A new trade union law sits in the legislature. It would mean the death of trade unionism in India. Tapan Sen’s statement about enslavement seems less hyperbolic in this context. If workers have no power, then they are effectively enslaved to the firm. This is already the case in factories that operate almost like concentration camps.

Walking through factories along the Chennai-Coimbatore corridor or in the Manesar area gives you a sense of the power of these new factories. They are a fortress, difficult to breach. Or a prison. Either way, trade unions are not welcome there. They are kept out by force—either violence or political muscle. Workers are often brought in from far away, migrants with few roots in the area. No workers stay long. As soon as they appear settled, they are removed.

Footloose workers and harassed trade unionists make for a harsh work environment. The culture of working-class solidarity erodes, social violence grows—the seedbed of neofascist politics.

Hope in Kerala

Kerala is a unique place in India. Here, the culture of struggle remains strong; the pride in Kerala’s history of social transformation is evident. Over the course of the past 100 years, Kerala has sharpened its attack on hierarchy and on division. Horrific social practices were beaten back, and the Left movement cultivated public action as a normal feature of social life.

When the Left is in power—as it is now in power—it does not introduce new policies by fiat. Mass movements of the Left develop public campaigns to raise awareness and build a political will behind policies. This is one of the reasons why the air of hopelessness does not hang over Kerala.

Elsewhere in India, about 300,000 farmers have committed suicide largely because of the agrarian debt crisis. Professor Siddik Rabiyath of the University of Kerala tells me that the fisher folk have a higher debt burden than farmers, but that they do not commit suicide. He suggests that this might be because of the hope that the next day’s catch will rescue them from debt. It is also because of the general atmosphere of hopefulness in Kerala.

Last year, when this state of 35 million went underwater in a flood, the fisher folk grabbed their boats and became the frontline of rescue workers. They did not do this work for money or for fame. They did it because of the tradition of social solidarity in the state and because of the culture of public action here (see the Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research dossieron the floods in Kerala).


The rail lines out of Thiruvananthapuram do not function. Strikers sit on the tracks. They have blocked the trains. So have strikers in Assam—at the other end of India. They have also blocked railway lines. National Highway 16 in Bhubaneswar, Odisha, is a parking lot. Cars and motorcycles cannot move. Schools and universities are silent. Unions patrolled the industrial areas outside Delhi and outside Chennai. Public buses in Mumbai sit in their parking lots, bus stands a lonely sight.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government has been silent. There are elections later this year. The temperature in India does not favor Modi. But that is not the reason for his silence. He has made it a habit to ignore public action, to stand above it all, pretend that it is not happening. If the new trade union law goes into effect, India will essentially abandon any commitment to workplace democracy. It is part of the slow erosion of democratic processes in the country, a drift into the ugliness of hierarchy and domination. The workers do not want this. They are on the streets. They have other plans for their future.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


  1. Spring Texan

    One reason I can’t stand Tulsi Gabbard is because of her tolerance for the horrendous Modi.

    As far as inspiring protest, thanks I was happy to learn of this. Solidarity! It was good too to read of the strength of this vital value in Kerala.

    The womens’ protests in India recently about whether women should be banned from a temple have also been massive and amazing. [As I read the article now, I see this is ALSO in Kerala.] Of course Modi supports their exclusion. They are really demonstrating against the basic ideology of misogyny as the exclusion of menstrual-age women is so the menstruating women won’t “tempt” a celibate deity.

    Sounds like Kerala rocks!

    The reinstatement of the value of solidarity is one of the most important changes we desperately need in the US instead of “everyone for himself”.

  2. Carolinian

    Surely the worst outcome of the neoliberal disease is not its effect on the US–still a very rich country–but the way these economic ideas have spread to regions of desperate poverty. Yesterday Counterpunch had an article about how corporate agribusiness is leading the world to disaster.

    One can only hope the cultural transmission belt will flip into reverse as mass protest overseas inspires working class America to do more than just vote for Donald Trump.

  3. hemeantwell

    Good piece. For more on the nature of Left politics there, this Wiki article is pretty good.
    Kerala stands out both as a long-term bastion of the Left and because the Communist parties that are part of the Left coalition have pursued more compromising, but effective policies, particularly agrarian, that seem to have helped them avoid becoming a bureaucratic social combat organization.

    Agrarian reform
    One of the major changes advocated by the CPI was the Agrarian Relations Bill, passed in 1961. The bill was intentionally moderate because those drafting it knew it would have to pass through many constitutional channels before it would be made into a law. Over 1,000 amendments were debated due to party divisions. Though the bill was moderate, it still changed the farming system. It abolished feudalism and aimed to create a capitalist agricultural system. The CPI did not push more radical Communist land reforms. Namboodiripad stated they would not attempt state ownership or collective farms because even though such ideas might appeal to intellectuals on a scientific basis, they would not actually help the peasantry in practice. The bill aimed to improve wages and working conditions as well as secure employment. Landlords were only allowed to work on their land if they paid compensation, which helped protect the tenants’ rights

    1. Jerri-Lynn Scofield

      Effective policies are not limited to agrarian policies, either. Kerala also measures well on literacy, and is one of two Indian states – along with Puducherry – where the sex ratio of female to male births is higher than 1.

  4. Chauncey Gardiner

    Appreciate the alternative views of economic developments that that are causing perturbations in the force field globally. In India I expect another round of engineered religious conflict will be applied by Modi’s party in an effort to reduce the public visibility of this issue soon enough.

    Appreciate the article by Vijay Prashad, the interview of Arundhati Roy that you ran a few days ago, and the coverage on the anniversary of the Bhopal environmental disaster that raise awareness of issues not covered by corporate media here and about which I was unaware. When considered with other developments like the gilet jaunes movement in France, seems to me that the neoliberal grip on state policies globally is beginning to shift, although what could follow is far from clear.

  5. georgieboy

    For a quick — and anger-inducing — look at life in Hindu society, read Ants Among Elephants by Sujatha Gidla.

    She was born into the Untouchables category — approximately 300 million strong, or weak.

    Kerala/Gujarat is about 20% Christian, versus national average about 2%. Christianity got a foothold there in part because it appealed to the Untouchables, as does Communism, in a world where 25% of the people start life off officially in the shi**er.

    Gidla now works for the NYC Subway system, btw. Her uncle was a famous leader in the Communist movement in the center of India, Telegana.

  6. Rajesh K

    Actually this seems to have been written by someone who thinks that Modi has done absolutely NOTHING. Demonetization was a failure, but the book “The Billionaire Raj” (by James Crabtree) argues that Modi has stopped large scale corruption that’s prevalent during “The Season of Scam” i.e. neoliberal practices like giving telecom licenses away for cheap. Crabtree however laments that no working honest government institution has been created afterwards, so rather India is now in a state of holding pattern, where no large scale projects have been approved for a while. The book was published late last year, and is available in Amazon.

    And for people thinking that Socialist India was better … the book also describes life under Nehru/Gandhi socialist policies and it ain’t fun. A relative of mine actually lived through that period and no way she will be willing to repeat that experience.

  7. Yo4

    The author mentions previous strikes in recent years, but says nothing about the outcome. Modi’s continued boldness suggests it wasn’t much, if anything.

    A google search on the subject isn’t very helpful probably because the subject is so broad.

    Does anyone here know what happened as a result of some or any of those strikes and the basis for apparent optimism for this round?

  8. DHG

    This is exactly what needs to transpire in the US. A complete and total labor revolt against the elites including the entrenched in DC. Throw all the bums out.

Comments are closed.