Bureau of Labor Statistics (Non) Reporting Tallies 8 Strikes in 2020 Versus Payday Report’s >1200

Yves here. It’s gratifying to see Mike Elk of Payday Report get some long overdue recognition. For those of you who have somehow managed not to hear of Payday Report despite this site linking to it regularly, Elk covers an important but not surprisingly neglected beat. Payday Report’s mission is “Covering labor in news deserts.”

Elk has kept at his project despite running what can only be described as an extreme shoestring operation. Sadly Payday report is in constant fundraising mode due to the lack of big donations and resulting difficulty even in covering what for a decent news operation would be petty change level costs, like car rental and hotel charges to cover the unionization campaign at the Amazon warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama.1 Elk, by virtue of his on the ground reporting, made the early, deeply unpopular, and correct call that the drive would fail.

Payday Report has just gotten an Emmy nomination. As Elk explained in an e-mail yesterday:

Mike Elk of Payday Report credited for work as Pittsburgh guide in filming the Emmy-nominated CNN special “Where Do We Even Start with White Supremacy?”

Today, the Television Academy announced that W. Kamau Bell’s CNN show “United Shades of America” was nominated for “Outstanding Hosted Nonfiction Series or Special 2021.” As the founder of Payday Report, I was so glad to see the nomination because I served as the local guide and advisor for the special’s opening 75-minute episode: ““Where Do We Even Start with White Supremacy?”

As a Jewish yinzer reporter who was at Tree of Life Synagogue on the morning of the massacre, I can’t tell you what it means for our work to be nominated for an Emmy.

I was first contacted by “United Shades of America” producer Raza Naqvi after he saw some of Payday Report’s work on how anti-racist activists were responding to white supremacy in the wake of the Tree of Life Synagogue massacre.

It was then that CNN began to explore where to film a special on white supremacy and systemic racism. The show’s producers initially wanted to do something broad like focusing on the deeper roots of white supremacy and how it manifests in society. But for months I worked the phones to lay out ideas and persuade producer Raza to do a story on systemic racism in Pittsburgh, focusing heavily on the community’s response in the wake of the Tree of Life massacre.

After I sent them copies of Payday’s work on the air quality crisis in Pittsburgh, I convinced them to come to Pittsburgh.

Then, after setting up a meeting between the producers and State Rep. Summer Lee, my high school classmate, I was able to work with them to create an opening that began with the horrors of the Tree of Life massacre, and then transitioned into how white supremacy also manifested itself in environmental racism in Pittsburgh’s Mon Valley. In a powerful scene, PA State Rep. Lee described US Steel as “a colonizer” poisoning black communities while contributing very little in tax dollars or jobs to the community.

As the post below explains, the big reason the Bureau of Labor Statistics was so wildly wrong on the level of strikes is the use of an outmoded definition. So no wonder so many supposed economic experts were caught flat-footed in 2021 at the degree to which workers are refusing to sign up for McJobs. Had they been paying attention, they would have seen that labor discontent was high and rising.

So again, hats off to Elk. And I hope you’ll chip in to support his work.

By Clarissa A. Leon, Editorial Director, PaydayReport.com and Mike Elk, Founder, PaydayReport.com. Originally published at the Institute for New Economic Thinking website

Earlier this year, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) revealed that 2020 was the third-lowest year for strikes in the United States since they started collecting data on strikes in 1947. The Bureau of Labor Statistics claimed that there were just eight “major work stoppages” in the US in 2020.

Payday Report’s COVID-19 Strike Wave Interactive Map, launched at the beginning of the pandemic in March 2020, began using news and social media accounts of workers walking off the job in protest as a measure of strike activity. By this measure, the map indicates at least 1,200 strikes in 2020 as reported in news and social media reports. These labor strike activities were counted as strikes even without regard to workplace size or union authorization.

Early on in the pandemic, Payday Report began to notice a massive strike wave brewing as workers, fearful of losing their lives, simply refused to work.

Almost immediately, strikes were on the move.

In late March of 2020, hundreds of mostly Black sanitation workers in Pittsburgh, members of Teamsters Local 249, engaged in an illegal wildcat strike to protest their working conditions during the pandemic.

Days later on March 27, a group of Black members of Teamsters Local 667 went on strike after a worker contracted COVID-19.

That same week poultry workers at Perdue Farms in Georgia went on strike to protest their working conditions during the pandemic.

One week later, another 1,000 meatpackers walked off in Greely, CO, requesting better personal protective safety gear and complaining how social distancing at the plant was all but nonexistent; they were working elbow to elbow.

In April, dozens of nurses in Beaver County, PAwalked off the jobat the Brighton Rehab and Wellness Center after 36 of their residents and six health care workers tested positive for the virus.

As the year progressed, the murder of George Floyd on May 25 in Minneapolis and the rise of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement spurred a new surge of strikes.

By June 19, 2020, Payday Report tracked more than 600 strikes, walkouts, wildcat strikes, and general strikes, notingthat workers walked off the job “at over 500 employers in the last three weeks alone.

BLM called on workers at workplaces across the nation to #Strike4BlackLives on July 20. About 60 different labor unions called for justice and walked out of their workplaces in solidarity.

From New York City to San Francisco, workerswalked out of their jobs at fast-food joints, nursing homes, warehouses, and more, all in solidarity with BLM.

While the pandemic continued, so did the strikes.

By December 2020, the number of strikes (which included walkouts, wildcat strikes, and general strikes) on Payday Report’s COVID-19 Strike Wave Interactive Mapreachednearly 1,200 strikes across the United States – one of the largest strike waves in decades, according to University of Wyoming Professor Mike Duff.

Still, according to the BLS, 2020 was exceptionally low. In fact, BLS said that it had the “third lowest number of major work stoppages since the series began in 1947.”

The BLS narrowly defines a work stoppage using an outdated system that only recognizes actions at employers with 1,000 or more workers, and actions “must last at least one shift during the week, Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.”

The stark difference between how BLS and Payday Report’s COVID-19 Strike Wave Interactive Map defines a strike illustrates the giant chasm between how the government views strikes and how they are covered in the media.

Even though Payday Report’s COVID-19 Strike Wave Interactive Map includes a broad range of work stoppages, the reports are gathered from two main sources: the news media, which underreports labor issues, and social media posts, especially from workers involved in or near the actions. Many workers, concerned about their safety, job, deportation, among other things, may not self-report worker actions on social media. It is likely that there are many work stoppages not picked up on the strike tracker.

No longer are union leaders calling for strike votes with strict control of strike activity, often directed by union staff. Now workers, often in nonunion workplaces, are coordinating online and simply walking out over concerns about COVID and in solidarity with the Black Lives Matter movement.

In the era of COVID and digital movements, these strikes look radically different from traditional labor strikes, the strike tracker can help change that dynamic.

Payday Report’s COVID-19 Strike Wave Interactive Map has helped change the discourse on worker uprisings. Major publications in the US, like NPR, and foreign publications like The Economistand The Sydney Morning Herald, have cited Payday Report’s strike numbers.

Of the eight major work stoppages counted by the BLS, five involved various SEIU local unions in Washington state, Illinois, and California. Theother unions participating in work stoppages, either with SEIU or separately, includedthe California Nurses Association, the St. Paul Federation of Educators, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, the Graduate Employees’ Organization of the University of Michigan, and the International Longshoremen and Warehouse Unions.

If Payday Report used the BLS’s definition, it would not have tracked the giant wave of strikes that surged just as the Black Lives Matter movement made headway across the nation in June and July 2020.

The tracker would have missed the scientists across the country, who in solidarity with BLM,participated in #ShutDownStem,or the numerous Seattle businesses whoclosed in solidarity.

The tracker would also have left out the10-person walkout of nurses in Providence St. John’s Medical Center in Santa Monica, CA, who refused to work without proper personal protective equipment.

Between March 1, 2020, and July 7, 2021, there have been 1,400 strikes since the beginning of the pandemic. While the pace of strikes is slightly slower than when the pandemic began, they’re still cropping up. It seems, once more, workers have had enough.

Payday Report will continue reporting on the Strike Wave and as always, report on stories where we talk to the workers first. Workers are taking action across the country as the tracker proves, even if those actions are uncounted by the BLS.

Payday Report would like to thank the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET) for providing support and technical assistance to the COVID-19 Strike Wave Interactive Map, and the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) for editorial assistance.

____

1 As much as the INET is an important validator, note that INET provided funding only for one initiative, not ongoing Payday Report overhead. INET funds specific research projects, and does not provide ongoing backing.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

12 comments

  1. timbers

    Maybe BLS can get in touch with the folks who tabulate CPI and other government “inflation” reports. I’m sure they have lots of good ideas to share with BLS on how to get to a perfect accuracy so that the measure of strikes each year and every years is zero or at least lower than what they measure now.

    Reply
    1. Left in Wisconsin

      I assume this is sarcasm? as it is BLS that also calculates CPI.

      There is a larger story here that involves many aspects:

      1. The Labor Dept, which houses BLS, and BLS itself have been objects of political tension from their very founding. While ostensibly founded as a “pro-worker” counterpart to the pro-business Commerce Dept, the Labor Dept has routinely been subject to control (mostly but not always during Repub administrations) by people hostile to its (ostensible) mission. And even in times when it has been mostly labor oriented, hostile Congresses have enacted extreme budget cuts (e.g. 40% in 1946-47) or explicit prohibitions on collecting or disseminating certain kinds of statistics (e.g. Reagan administration) to thwart its ability to support worker interests.

      2. It is impossible to separate the history of BLS/Labor Dept from US labor history, especially anti-communism. Pro-business opposition to any labor orientation meant the dept always stayed close to the official/acceptable (anti-communist) labor movement: the AFL up to 1930s, AFL and CIO through WW2 (often with dual internal staffing), and the mainstream AFL-CIO through about 1980. This is a main reason why the strike data has always been about official strikes rather than wildcat strikes. BLS has always promoted itself as a-political and simply focused on collecting the “data.” In terms of bureaucratic longevity, this has probably been a wise strategy.

      3. Since 1980, I would argue that the dept has been completely adrift with regard to its historical mission as it really has no constituency – the official labor movement has basically had no agenda since then except slowing its decline/demise. This has only reinforced its capture by the same neoliberal interests that have captured most of DC.

      4. BLS was originally conceived in the 1890s to collect labor statistics – as the name indicates. Maybe its first major project was a multi-year study of productivity gains resulting from the switch in manufacturing from “hand” to “machine” labor, with the dual objectives of determining the degrees of job loss from productivity gains and the degree to which gain from productivity growth were being shared in terms of worker wage growth. The original CPI work was all about informing union negotiating strategies (not cutting Social Security benefits). But now, and this process really has been on-going for a century or more, it is really a bureau of economic statistics. This can been seen in the transformation of CPI and productivity statistics from “labor” oriented statistics meant to inform union strategy to “economic” statistics meant to inform “economists” and “economic policy makers.” Other than legacy considerations, it is not clear why there are separate economic statistical agencies in Labor, Commerce, and at the Fed. They all do the same thing and they all now work in the same economic framework/universe.

      TL/DR: Payday Report is an invaluable to corrective to the official government statistics and statistical agencies which have been corrupted by pro-business (anti-union), narrowly pro AFL or AFL-CIO, and mainstream economic (anti-power analysis) interests.

      Reply
      1. aliteralmind

        Your comment is fascinating and validates my instincts as laid out in this post:

        Our overly-rosy unemployment statistics (and its math) ignore millions

        This is a really important topic: Ensuring the core data is corrupted in favor of the powerful before it can ever be evaluated and then used to craft policy. It makes it such that those down the pipeline can act in genuine good faith and STILL screw the little guy. They can only work with what they got!

        Can you please recommend some sources to learn more about this stuff? You can email me at activistmmt@gmail.com if you like.

        Thanks!

        Reply
  2. betamax3000

    I work in the labor movement and Mike Elk has a terrible reputation — not only as a reporter of questionable ethics but as an alleged harasser of women in labor media and journalism. I don’t speak for said women, of course, but a simple search on Twitter for Mike’s name will surface a considerable number of stories.

    Further – his prediction that the Amazon Bessemer union election would not succeed was not somehow unique or brave of him. Virtually all labor people were not optimistic about the chances of success of a Board election, especially due to Amazon’s flooding of the proposed bargaining unit with thousands of additional workers, sophisticated and some ways unprecedented anti-union campaign. There are plenty of interesting post-mortems on the campaign’s strategy and tactics which folks can look up if they’re genuinely interested in understanding what went wrong and what can be learned.

    However, most in the labor movement chose not to add fuel to the fire of right-wing and Amazon’s media blitz during the campaign’s bossfight itself, instead channeling efforts in sharing (pro-union) workers’ stories to combat the Amazon propaganda. Others, especially with organizing experience or willingness to knock doors, etc., spent time in Bessemer helping out in various ways. Meanwhile, Mike seemingly used it as an opportunity for self-promotion and being iconoclastic as a self-professed pro-union media figure. For instance, Mike selectively edited a video of a worker — claiming he voted against the union, when in fact he voted for it. https://twitter.com/mindyisser/status/1376862167727796224

    I am not denying that the Payday Report has the capacity to do interesting or high-quality work. However, I am in solidarity with the women he allegedly harassed/harasses and don’t promote or trust his work, myself.

    Reply
    1. Alex Cox

      Sexual harrassment claims were also thrown at the founders of Wikileaks. This appears to be standard operating procedure to discredit independent journalists.

      Reply
    2. Yves Smith Post author

      Please point to an actual statement in print by a labor sympathizer that the Bessemer vote was likely to fail. Private mutterings and sticking your neck out are in two completely different universes.

      Places like Common Dreams were treating it as a probable win, and they must have heard that somewhere. The New York Times had an in-depth post mortem and they depicted the organizers as blindsided by the loss.

      This is ad hominem and a violation of our written site Policies. And I am also not a supporter of the #MeToo overreach of treating women as always correct.

      Reply
  3. PKMKII

    Manufacturing consent. The “official” tally shows a happy labor force, those consuming the official tally will think that all is well, labor is content with the current status quo. Never mind what you’re seeing, the algorithm can’t be wrong…

    Reply
  4. Trogg

    Labor Notes was right that not all the Black Lives Matter closures which inflate Elk’s numbers should not be counted as strikes since we’re talking employers closing shop in many instances. The BLS numbers, on the other hand, are clearly too low. That being said, if the bls changes it’s definition, then the data may not be able to be used for historical comparison. They may have to give us numbers for a “strike 1” along with a less restrictive “strike 2” going forward.

    Reply
    1. Yves Smith Post author

      The BLS has regularly changed definitions for unemployment since the early 1990s (by who is or is not in the labor pool) without renaming its series.

      Reply
      1. trogg

        And actually I just noted that Reagan forced the BLS to stop keep track of stoppages involving worksites of 6 or more. So thanks for pointing out. Nevertheless Elk’s numbers are kind of ridiculous (with all due respect to a guy who does vital reporting otherwise). It’s bad if the BLS doesn’t include the historic teachers strikes in their data. But it’s equally important not to sensationally inflate the numbers as Elk has and has Labor Notes clearly documented.

        Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *