Chaos in the Caucasus: The Great Armenian Sell Out and Turkish/NATO Dreams of a Turan Corridor Stretching to China

On Monday we looked at Azerbaijan’s deteriorating relationship with Russia on manufactured grounds—with a heavy assist from the US and Israel—and how it fits into a long-planned Turkic corridor project slicing through the South Caucasus. Key to that plan is Armenia where the US and company have been laying the groundwork for this operation for years. We’re now seeing it come more fully into the light. Let’s examine what’s taking place in Armenia before turning to Türkiye and wider implications for the Eurasian heartland.

Armenia’s Least Worst Option: Beg Russia for Help (But That’s Not Going to Happen)

The US with heavy French involvement, has successfully turned to Armenia into a tool of the West in recent years. The US has one of its largest embassies in the world in Armenia and even a representative of the US armed forces embedded in the Armenian Defense Ministry. The biggest problem for the West was that the plan to get a stooge government in Georgia failed — an effort that isn’t completely dead, but it’s on life support, and with it the logistics to Armenia.

Nonetheless, the Armenian government, by most objective accounts acting against the interests of its people, has successfully eroded ties with Russia over the past few years,[1]  despite Moscow being the historic counterweight to the designs of Türkiye and Azerbaijan. Why did the Armenian government of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan do this? Hard to say for certain. The charitable view is that was a clumsy rebalancing act. Either way, Armenia is now in an untenable position, and it looks like the final sell-out has begun.

There is now talk that the US, having abandoned the plan to weasel itself more comfortably militarily into Armenia, is instead content to turn the job over to Türkiye and Azerbaijan. It’s also possible this was the plan all along and that resistance from the Armenian government and tensions between Azerbaijan and the West were just a feint that are so in vogue in the West nowadays. It would make sense that the plan to open the Turan Corridor not get the green light until Armenia had successfully pushed Russia out of any involvement. That now appears to be the case unless Armenia does an about face and pleads for Moscow’s help, and/or Russia were to forcefully intervene.

As of now, the government in Yerevan is doubling down on its anti-Russia stance as it arrests clergymen and businesspeople who were allegedly plotting a coup. Armenia is speeding towards nationalizing a power grid owned by jailed Russian businessman as Pashinyan stated there is a “high probability that certain circles in Russia are behind these hybrid operations and this hybrid war.” One thing Armenia has not done yet is make any request that Russia vacate its military base in the country — one Russia is reportedly reinforcing:

Armenian analysts are pointing to the Russian Orthodox Church’s opposition to the arrests, as well as the alleged involvement of some members of the ArBat Battalion, a unit of Armenian volunteers that is part of the Russian Armed Forces, as evidence that Moscow is behind the unrest.

Pashinyan and Putin meet in October of 2024 at the Kremlin.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov recently commented on the upheaval, saying the following:

“This is, of course, an internal matter for Armenia,” he stated. “We are, of course, interested in the preservation of law and order in Armenia, so that Armenia is a prosperous, stable country, friendly to Russia.”

The archbishops who have been detained are key members of the Armenian Apostolic Church, which has been the main driver of protests against Pashinyan over his policies towards Azerbaijan, which some see as a betrayal of Armenian interests.

Included in the arrests is Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan, the leader of the Sacred Struggle opposition movement. Galstanyan was educated in the U.K. and Canada and in recent years has risen to prominence due to his opposition to any land deals with Azerbaijan. He has the support of much of the political opposition, as well as the Sasna Tsrer organization, an extra-parliamentary force that is anti-Russian, pro-West, and has perpetrated political violence in the past.

Public outcry and protests have followed the crackdown with some leading to clashes with police. The arrests began as Pashinyan made a historic visit to Istanbul to meet with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

And just prior to that trip to Türkiye the situation had seemingly reached a point of no return with the head of the Armenian Church accusing Pashinyan of being circumcised in comparing him to Judas. Pashinyan responded that he was ready to ‘“prove the opposite.”

Setting aside the status of Pashinyan’s foreskin, where does this all leave us?

Should Pashinyan be looking to make some sort of deal with Türkiye and Azerbaijan, it would help explain the crackdown on the opposition. There is a fear among the Armenian opposition that Pashinyan will agree to—if he hasn’t already—cede territory to allow Türkiye and Azerbaijan to open their coveted Zangezur Corridor. Note from the Monday post that Zangezur would not touch Iranian territory, nor does it mean that Turkiye and Azerbaijan would invade Iran, which seems far-fetched. It does, however, hurt both Russia and Iran economically, weakens their influence in the South Caucasus, and could potentially stir up trouble in Iran’s northwestern states. In other words, it’s a major headache that has significant long term consequences.

And it’s fairly clear that the point from the 2020 Moscow-brokered peace treaty between Armenia and Azerbaijan that Russia oversee any such Zangezur route will not be honored. While Russian officials remain tight-lipped, others aren’t being quite so diplomatic:

Let’s contrast with the stance from EU:

Of course, Brussels and the US are very interested in a direct route to get their hands on all that Caspian and Central Asian fossil fuels and strategic minerals. They had hoped to do so through Georgia, but a Turkic corridor that simultaneously hurts Iran makes for a fine Plan B—even if it means turning to old friend/foe Erdogan.

As the Atlantic Council so-eloquently put it a few years back: “Türkiye can become an energy hub—but not by going all-in on Russian gas.” Washington wants that gas to come from Azerbaijan and elsewhere in Central Asia.

Türkiye Does Türkiye Things

The relationship between Türkiye and the West is often described as transactional and with good reason. That’s usually how things get done with the second most important member of NATO (recall the deal for Türkiye to approve Sweden’s NATO accession in exchange for 40 F-16s).

For months, the EU has been increasing Türkiye’s role in the bloc’s defense industries and it was recently capped off by news last week that  the two sides will hold defense talks after a three-year pause. Ankara is looking for access to the EU’s new $170 billion defense fund.

Perhaps the biggest news of all on this front is that, according to Erdogan, the US is easing up on 2017 the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA). Washington imposed sanctions on Ankara in 2020 over its purchase of the Russian-made S-400 missile defense system. Erdogan said a month ago that the sanctions, which have hammered Türkiye’s defense sector, are softening and that steps toward lifting them are progressing rapidly, which Türkiye has insisted on for years.

US Ambassador to Türkiye Tom Barrack said recently that he expects a deal on lifting the sanctions by the end of the year, which would involve welcoming Türkiye back into the F-35 program.

There was also the recent launch of a joint venture between Turkish drone maker Baykar and Italian defense contractor Leonardo (Leonardo has very close defense ties with Israel).

Türkiye had for some time been trying to purchase 40 Eurofighter-Typhoon new-generation aircraft, but Germany was holding up the sale.

That sensitive issue is now apparently resolved. According to the German Handelsblatt daily, Berlin is giving the green light.

Recall that prior to the Syria offensive, Germany and others eased off a years-long unofficial embargo on defense exports to Türkiye. Two months ahead of that operation, Der Spiegel reported that Germany’s Federal Security Council, which meets in secret, was approving the sale of $368 million worth of heavy weaponry to Türkiye, as well as reconsidering Türkiye’s request to purchase Eurofighter warplanes.

The big question is what is the West getting in return for all this recent goodwill? One could argue it’s an attempt to shore up NATO’s industrial base, which is severely lacking. That’s certainly possible.

It could also be a cooperation with the US plan to further weasel its way into the Caucasus. While Türkiye’s moves eastwards via a link up with Azerbaijan through Armenia are part of its own grand visions for a Turkic corridor stretching into China and it has long insisted Armenia will cooperate one way or another, it likely took some deals to get Ankara to agree to the potential Washington role in that plan. This US policy is not a product of the Trump administration, but it certainly has its own motivations:

The U.S. model envisions American business interests as a stabilizing force, similar to a recent deal involving rare earth minerals in Ukraine. One U.S. official reportedly told [Olesya Vardanyan of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace] that the plan could even lead to a Nobel Peace Prize for former President Donald Trump, suggesting that the initiative may become part of his broader foreign policy platform.

Meanwhile, Türkiye’s eastwards march will ratchet up the pressure on Iran and Russia. Tehran is worried that Ankara’s visions of Pan-Turkism will incite ethnic unrest and divisions in the Azeri and Kurdish areas in the northwest of Iran. As Ali Nassar writes at The Cradle: 

It reveals a layered geopolitical project anchored in Pan-Turanist nationalism, Muslim Brotherhood-aligned political Islam, and strategic deployment of military and development tools – crafted to serve Ankara’s national interests while converging with NATO’s broader regional goals.

…Pan-Turanism, an early 20th-century ideology premised on the unification of Turkic-speaking peoples from Anatolia to western China, has been resurrected in Ankara as a vehicle for geopolitical consolidation. Today, Turkiye deploys this vision to deepen its grip on Central Asia – particularly in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Azerbaijan.

This ideological push is operationalized through the Organization of Turkic states, which functions as a joint political, economic, and security bloc linking Ankara with these post-Soviet republics.

Türkiye and the West also have visions of using the Zangezur as an energy corridor to send fossil fuels and other resources from Central Asia and the Caspian westwards while cutting out Russia and Iran, all the while increasing their footprint in these countries, effectively carving out a chunk of the Eurasian “heartland.” 

Here’s a better view for those in the back:

***

I can’t find the comment right now, but someone here at NC said the Western Zionists see Iran as a game of Jenga. Is it fair to say Iran won the 12-Day War and that Russia is winning/has won in Ukraine? Yes.

But the empire always has tricks up its sleeve, works on long timelines, and as Israel demonstrates daily, it has no red lines.

Should Türkiye, Azerbaijan and Armenia make a move for Zangezur, the bet in think tank landia is that Iran and Russia are too preoccupied with their other conflicts against Western proxies to do all that much about it. We’ll see. Iran has called such a scheme a red line, and Tehran and Moscow will no doubt respond in some fashion.

Economic measures are easy to envision. As Fitch Ratings notes, Armenia’s economy relies significantly on Russia for both trade and energy. For example, Armenia also currently pays Russia $165 per thousand cubic meters of gas, well below the market price in Europe, and Russia is Armenia’s number one trading partner. Due to Russian companies’ large investments in the Azerbaijani oil and gas sector, it is one of the bigger beneficiaries of Brussels’ efforts to increase energy imports from Azerbaijan in order to replace Russian supplies. Azerbaijan is also importing more Russian gas itself in order to meet its obligations to Europe. Türkiye gets nearly half of its natural gas and a quarter of its oil from Russia on good deals and profits from sending Turkstream gas on to Southeastern Europe.

Will economic measures be enough, though? Moscow often seems convinced that at some point national self interest will kick in for these countries, as will an awareness that conflict would be devastating, but common sense is in short supply these days, and the US is proficient at getting rulers to go against their country’s national interest. As Yves detailed yesterday, Russia might in typical late fashion be coming to that conclusion. It’s important to note that the issue of Zangezur was a cause of friction between Moscow and Tehran with Iranian leadership alarmed while Russia thought it was going to be involved and benefit.

They’re on the same page now. Is it too late to avoid violence? With drones being launched against Russia from Kazakhstan and against Iran from Azerbaijan, we could be well on our way towards a wider conflict.

From the American neocon-Zionists perspective, if they set Russia and Iran’s backyard on fire, great. They’re happy to help provide the gasoline. And no doubt they’re already well on their way starting their next inferno while Moscow and Tehran try to put this one out.

Notes

  1. As we wrote on Monday, Armenia blamed Russia for not coming to its aid more forcefully in its conflicts with Azerbaijan. While one can sympathize with that sentiment, let’s review some other key details:
  • It was Armenia that moved peace talks to Western platforms, and it was during those meetings that Armenia agreed to officially recognize Nagorno-Karabakh as part of Azerbaijan.
  • Once Armenia did so (and PM Pashinyan declared so publicly), the die was cast. The region was (and is) recognized as Azerbaijani territory by the international community but was overwhelmingly populated by ethnic Armenians. Roughly 100,000 of them fled to Armenia after Azerbaijan blockaded the region for months and then moved militarily to assert control in September – an operation that resulted in hundreds of deaths.
  • Despite moving the negotiation process under the guidance of the West and publicly recognizing Nagorno-Karabakh as Azerbaijani territory, the Pashinyan government has sought to lay all the blame for its loss at the feet of Russia.

It quickly became apparent why. Armenian officials are arguing that since the 2020 agreement also included provisions about Russian peacekeepers in Nagorno-Karabakh and their control over a corridor that ran from Armenia to Nagorno-Karabakh, and since that all fell apart, the rest of the document is essentially null and void, which means no Russian involvement in any Zangezur Corridor. We’ve since heard Armenian officials discuss alternatives like private security forces or Russia monitoring from afar—whatever that means. Among a series of downgrades to Russia’s presence in Armenia, on January 1, Russian border guards withdrew from the Armenian-Iranian border checkpoint at Yerevan’s request. Since 1992 Armenia’s borders with Türkiye and Iran had been the responsibility of Russian troops.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

7 comments

  1. ambrit

    What if any relevance is the fact that Armenia is mainly Christian, the Armenian Apostolic Church, and thus, supposedly natural allies with the Russian Orthodox Church? The Turks are, after all, followers of Islam, not always friendly to Christians. This could be spun as a religious war.
    Given the Western alignment of the Pashinyan government, the Russians could take a page out of Washington’s play book and foment a colour revolution of their own in Yerevan. The same could be said of Azerbaijan. Not a direct intervention in either nation, but a new “geopolitical nudge theory.” Also possible in Azerbaijan could be the infiltration of Chechen “Freedom Fighters” to help ‘free’ their co-religionists from the shackles of Western Imperialism.
    The Caucasus has generally been one of the more ‘volatile’ regions of the world.
    Stay safe.

    Reply
    1. hoki_haya

      of enormous relevance. religion is of course at the root of regional enmity. armenia was the first christian nation on earth, 302AD, a man named Lusavorich who was imprisoned at the base of Ararat for his faith in the new teachings. many (largely female) armenian martyrs before that, who were hunted up here by the Romans – one can still visit their tombs and the caves where they hid.

      yet yerevan, in armenian (and russian) spirit of brotherhood, hosts a beautiful mosque, and i have never seen persecution of anyone on religious grounds – yerevan is a crossroads of iranians, indians, europeans, and the beloved armenians. turks been trying to wipe it out since even before the 1915 genocide. back then, americans and russians worked together (natural allies) to construct orphanages and hold turks at bay.

      these days are bleak for this nation, but as usual, armenians hold spirits high, having little other recourse.

      it’s the ‘freest’ country i’ve ever seen – of course that can’t be allowed.

      Reply
      1. hoki_haya

        when the people pushed Pashinyan’s balaclava-covered blackguards out of Etchmiadzin – the seat of the Armenian Apostolic Church – last week, they were shouting, ‘Turk! Turk!’

        Reply
      2. Polar Socialist

        I beg to differ. Azerbaijan first and foremost wants to establish a connection from Azerbaijan proper to the separate Nakhchivan region to “correct a historic injustice” – and without going trough Iran both because “sovereignty” and because there are more ethnic Azeris in Iran than in Azerbaijan.
        Armenia would prefer the existing set-up, where it remians the hub for north-south traffic – which is actually viable compared to the Zangezur corridor that would only really serve Nakhchivan area, regardless of the marketing talk.
        Iran doesn’t really care how the trade in the are is organized, as long as it is organized, but it is very suspicious that Zangezur corridor means NATO coming to the area to cause trouble.
        Same for Russia, in the medium term it still has Armenia and Azerbaijan by the short an curlies, is all for peace and prosperity in the area and keeping NATO out.
        Turkiye is more likely playing it’s pan-Turkic game rather than NATO-expansion, and is using the “access to Mediterranean” as a shiny for the Azerbaijan to get on-board. Given it’s interventions in Libya, Syria and all over the Kurdistan, getting seriously involved in Caspian area would be a serious over-stretching.
        India will be mightily annoyed if any of this disrupts the International North–South Transport Corridor.

        tldr; there are plenty of reasons for all of the regional actors even without bringing religions in to the picture.

        Reply
        1. hoki_haya

          i recall my first flight here from athens, examining maps, and trying how on earth to understand that such a thing as Nakhijevan could be Azeri? the map speaks for itself. there has been a long-term, multi-generational plan, to rid Armenians from existence – this absolutely exists today in the Turkish mind as it did over a hundred years ago. Azerbaijan is its proxy, Israel’s on-board, and about 17 different voices inside the current admin are debating to what degree the US should be as well.

          certainly religion is here – there’s just no denying that. come see.

          Reply
    2. The Rev Kev

      They could also take a page out of western playbooks and have all sorts of ad hoc groups spring up to attack any western corridors in the same way has been happening to the Chinese. I’m sure that the Russians and Chinese would be very helpful with financing, recruiting, training and equipping any such groups and perhaps the Taliban can help out here. After all, what can the CIA do. Sue them for copyright infringement?

      The only question in my mind is when Erdogan will turn on the others. He loves doing this sort of stuff and will always betray people. There is no such thing as a long term deal with him. With the proper inducements he will flip and knows as the war in the Ukraine shuts down, that the Russians will be able to turn their attention more to him.

      Reply
      1. NotThePilot

        I honestly don’t have a read yet on what’s happening in the Caucasus. I mainly just agree with the take that Pashniyan & Aliyev are going to wind up hurting themselves & their own countries most in the end.

        I think you’re onto something about Erdoğan, or maybe his strategic position more precisely, being the real wildcard. Any hypothetical corridor to Azerbaijan has to pass through Kurdish areas of the country. In that light, the stand-down call from Öcalan earlier this year definitely seems to be part of a plan. Even if the PKK dissolves though, buy-in for any grand schemes from the east of the country is still an open question.

        Maybe more importantly though is Erdoğan’s political support overall. The crackdown on the CHP may give the AKP room to maneuver in the short-term, but I haven’t heard anyone claim support for the AKP is growing. The Turkish economy isn’t doing well, the AKP is fundamentally neoliberal instead of autarkic (so the econo-political link is more like the US where hardship demoralizes rather than consolidates support like in Russia or Iran), and that was before becoming new part-owners of Syria.

        Taken altogether, whatever the Turkish government’s involvement, I’m not sure whether it’s from a position of strength or trying to dig out of a hole

        Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *