[Today’s Iran war post launched before complete. Please return at 8:00 AM EDT for a final version]
Ansar Allah’s closure of the Bab el Mandeb strait, Trump’s commitment to more kinetic escalation this week as Iran selectively damages critical petrostate energy and economic infrastructure, reports of fracture in Saudi Arabia and Israel and the continued slow bleeding out of the global economy all point to pressures continuing to build on connected economic, military, and political fronts. Yet as we will point out, too many forecasters are making linear forecasts, as if things will continue more or less as they are now, such at Robert Pape suggesting that Trump can continue the conflict on something like the current footing for six months. They are ignoring that pressures in any of these systems, or across systems, can and likely will generate sudden, large dislocations.
As we have described in connection with financial crises, when too much energy is pumped into a system, it will undergo a sudden change to a less ordered state. Ice becomes water. Water becomes steam.
After the rupture of the Great Crash and then the Depression and the creation of a bulwark of rules and supports to prevent anything like that happening again, the tacit assumption was the US and other advanced economies would not suffer the sort of near or actual banking system collapse that occurs in developing countries (where the IMF’s tender ministrations buffer short-term damage at the cost of “reforms” that hurt the working classes). They might have slower moving “crises” like the S&L crisis, where institutions are put down and the costs, in terms of recessions and distribution of losses, are distributed broadly if not fairly.
The near-failure of the global financial system in September-October 2008 came about due to the authorities engaging in mere short-term patch ups during the three preceding acute phases, and then no one in the officialdom considering what would happen if Lehman became insolvent. Incredibly, it collapsed in the worst way possible, with the skimpiest bankruptcy filing allowed. Even though Lehman had hired the top bankruptcy lawyer in the US, Harvey Miller, he had not been authorized to saddle up and make any preparation. Miller was shocked not just at the fact of the sudden implosion but that no one at the Treasury or Fed had contacted him, or apparently any other bankruptcy pro, to ascertain what a Lehman bankruptcy might set off.
In 2008, we merely had one crisis, in derivatives that turbo-charged underlying real economy subprime mortgages. Right now, on the financial front alone, we have multiple potential train wrecks: an AI stock/bond bubble collapse, the overlapping stresses in private debt, and crytocurrencies. And unlike 2008, when massive Chinese stimulus blunted the impact of the meltdown, as we report in Links today, the Chinese debt overhang is extreme and China’s national champion EV industry is flagging.
What happens to all those financial flash points as the underlying Strait of Hormuz and now (unless Saudi Arabia unexpectedly backs down) Bab el Mandab economic squeezes intensify to the point of creating severe price shocks and shortages in critical supplies like diesel? I do not expect happy outcomes. A fresh sighting of brewing trouble:
A massive leverage unwind is underway in semiconductor ETFs:
Assets under management (AUM) in US leveraged semiconductor ETFs have dropped -$63 billion from the June peak, to $100 billion, the lowest since late April.
This marks a -39% decline, the largest drawdown since April… pic.twitter.com/EsnxvTvHM6
— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) July 19, 2026
In other words, not only is each of these pressure realms – economic, military, political – each subject to independent crises, it seems very likely that they are, to revive old crisis-era concepts, tightly coupled. A severe disruption in one, like a big jump in oil prices or LNG shortages, can trigger sudden, disruptive action in the military and/or political arenas.
Let’s turn first to the sign of mounting stress on the military front. Trump has committed himself to the punishment of Iran to get them to let go of the Strait of Hormuz, as in capitulate. But as many have said, not only does the US lack the ability to do so, but it is about to be exposed as the emperor that has no clothes, as in woefully short of means, much sooner than most press outlets have conditioned the public to expect.
On top of that, as a Janta Ka segment we featured yesterday stated and Alastair Crooke confirmed on Judge Napolitano yesterday, Iran is systematically pushing the US out of based on the Gulf, with the US trying to retreat to Jordan. The next phase is to force the US out of Jordan to Israel, which will then set up the systematic destruction of military assets there. We’ll soon turn to a new Larry Johnson piece where he anticipates the US trying to apply lavish porcine maquillage to this forced retreat. Johnson calls it “debasification”.
As we will soon discuss, that increase the odds of a desperate Trump engaging in an ultimately ineffective show of strength, possibly in the form of a shock-and-awe bombing campaign on Pickaxe Mountain, where the US believes Iran’s enriched uranium and centrifuges are housed.1 Brandon Weichert and Karen Kwaitkowski believe the US could mount a nuclear strike.
In addition, the other fantasy about how the US will subdue Iran, via economic harm, is coming up short. The sanctions regime is so severe that the war proper is not doing incremental damage to the economy.2
First to the big picture, growing evidence of US military impotence and what desperate measures the US might employ in response.
‼️ The truth of the situation is becoming shockingly clear to more and more people in Washington.
But the dilemma remains: withdraw and relinquish West Asia to the Iran / Russia / China bloc, or continue to fight and relinquish the entire empire. https://t.co/iR0CveiMy6
— Will Schryver (@imetatronink) July 20, 2026
⚡️⭕️ New Telegraph report: a US official says Washington does not have enough missiles to sustain an all-out war with Iran, amid a Washington Post assessment that Trump's escalation path against Iran has hit a dead end. Iran is described as able to withstand losses despite…
— Middle East Observer (@ME_Observer_) July 21, 2026
And Iran is getting stronger as the US weakens. From Military Watch in U.S. Intel Warns Iran’s Missile Capabilities Continuing to Improve Despite Months of Air Strikes:
Senior U.S. intelligence officials have concluded that Iran’s ballistic missile program has continued to advance despite close to five months of intensive American and Israeli attacks, raising growing concerns in Washington regarding the long-term effectiveness of the military campaign. Intelligence assessments indicate that while production facilities and launch infrastructure have suffered damage, Iran has retained a substantial portion of its missile development capability and continues to improve both the performance and survivability of its arsenal. Alongside the destruction of critical civilian infrastructure and the elimination of the country’s political leadership, the destruction of Iran’s missile arsenals was a leading priority for U.S. forces during its attacks on the country.
Particular concern has reportedly centred on improvements in missile accuracy, manoeuvrability and survivability. Newer generations of Iranian ballistic missiles and hypersonic glide vehicles have demonstrated increasingly sophisticated terminal manoeuvring capabilities intended to complicate interception by missile defence systems. The Israeli paper Haaretz near the end of March confirmedthat 8 out of 10 Iranian missiles launched against Israeli targets were reaching their targets, following mounting reports and growing quantities of footage pointing to the failures of Israeli and U.S. ballistic missile defences. Iran has also gradually transitioned to building. Missiles with solid-fuel propulsion, reducing launch preparation times while improving the mobility and survivability of transporter-erector-launchers.
Iran’s missile forces have also demonstrated an unexpectedly high operational tempo throughout the conflict. Despite repeated strikes on military infrastructure, Iranian forces have continued launching ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and long-range drones against U.S. military facilities and allied targets across the Middle East. The continued pace of operations has reinforced assessments that Iran entered the war with significantly larger missile inventories than many Western estimates had suggested.
And the overall Iranian strategy is proving to be very successful. From Alternative News on Twitter:
What we’re witnessing is not random retaliation (like bombing Tel Aviv), but a deliberate campaign aimed at systematically degrading the regional architecture that allows the US and its allies to project military power across the Middle East.
Several principles of warfare are being applied:
1. Suppression of enemy support infrastructure.
2. Degradation of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities.
3. Attrition of air defense and interceptor inventories.
4. Disruption of logistics and sustainment.
5. Political pressure on host nations.
6. Shaping the operational environment before attempting anything larger.Iran is not yet fighting with all its tools and weapons. It is not a cornered country and is still shaping the battlefield for the next level of attack.
And again, the US is not merely being shown as unable to protect commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz. It is also being systematically turfed out of the theater. I encourage you to read Larry Johnson’s detailed post, DeBasification… A Fancy Word for Booting the US Out of the Middle East, in full. Key sections:
Iran has launched targeted attacks during the past two weeks on key US bases in Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. This has produced a de facto evacuation of US forces and equipment from most of these bases. The US Navy’s Fifth Fleet Headquarters in Bahrain is in shambles; the Combined Air Operations Center (CAOC) at Al Udeid in Qatar has been closed and moved to Shaw Air Force Base in South Carolina. And Iran continues to pound bases in Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar to ensure that no US aircraft or missile launchers remain intact at those locations.
The US also has relocated the $250 million MQ-4C Triton. In early May 2026, the US dispatched the MQ-4C Triton drone to Jordan…
Following massive missile strikes by Iran on 11 and 12 July on Jordan’s two airbases hosting US combat aircrafts, including the MQ-4C Triton, the US pulled the plug on keeping the Triton in Jordan….
During the first 43 days of the 2026 Iran war (Operation Epic Fury, beginning 28 February), Iran systematically targeted the sensor and communications layer of the US military’s integrated air defense architecture across the Persian Gulf…
By the end of the first 43 days, Iran had hit at least 12–19 radar and SATCOM systems across seven countries, with total damage estimated at $3.15 to $5+ billion.
And Iran is keeping up the punishment:
⚡️🚨 IRGC statement (Communique No. 40): Iranian forces struck a compound housing US forces in Jordan, reportedly killing a number of soldiers, marking a casualty claim in the ongoing wave of attacks on American-linked sites in the region. (IRGC statement via IRIB News, Iran…
— Middle East Observer (@ME_Observer_) July 21, 2026
In case you had any doubts, the US escalation has not impeded the Iranian success in choking the Strait of Hormuz:
Ten days into the new phase of the war (which the US said would degrade Iranian attack capabilities in the Strait of Hormuz), the IRGC keeps hitting oil tankers. Overnight, another vessel was hit and the crew had to jump into the lifeboats. https://t.co/oO92ekR3SM
— Javier Blas (@JavierBlas) July 21, 2026
And from Lloyd’s List in Hormuz tanker transits slump as attacks mount and dark voyages dominate:
- Tanker transits through Hormuz fell further last week, with dark transits now accounting for nearly 70% of all movements
- Non-Iran-linked VLCC inbound transits collapsed, signalling evaporating owner confidence
- Another tanker was struck on Tuesday near Oman, days after three Dynacom vessels were hit, threatening a chilling effect on owners and operators in the region
And to Ansar Allah making the sorry state in the Strait of Hormuz worse, from Asia Times in Houthis announce maritime embargo of Saudi Arabia:
Houthi rebels in Yemen on Monday announced they were imposing a maritime embargo against Saudi Arabia in yet another threat to global petroleum supplies amid the US war on Iran.
Yahya Saree, spokesperson for the Houthis, said in a video announcement that the militia would be enforcing the shipping embargo in retaliation for last week’s bombing of Sanaa Airport, which the group blamed on the Saudis…
According to Javier Blas, energy and commodities columnist at Bloomberg, Saudi Arabia has been shipping roughly 4.5 million barrels of oil per day through shipping channels in the Red Sea, with “most of it” traveling through the Strait of Bab al-Mandeb.
The Houthis’ announcement of an embargo against the Saudis comes as the US has continued burning through its crude inventories.
Data released by US Energy Information Administration revealed that US crude inventories fell by 1.7 million barrels over the week ending July 10, leaving stocks at their lowest level since 1983.
The Saudis could of course back down now that Ansar Allah has thrown dow the gauntlet. But they too are doubling down. From Global21 in In the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, chaos is unfolding rapidly:
The Houthis announced this week the closure of the strait to Saudi vessels…
Until last week, Saudi Arabia was exporting around 4 to 4.5 million barrels per day through the port of Yanbu on the Red Sea. Of that total, approximately 2.5 million barrels needed to sail south, crossing the Bab el-Mandeb Strait to supply the Asian market…
The alternative, circumnavigating the African continent, adds between 6,000 and 6,500 kilometers to the journey, equivalent to 10 to 14 extra days of continuous sailing. The additional cost, solely in fuel and crew operational expenses, could reach up to US$1.5 million per vessel.
The cost of maritime insurance has also skyrocketed and some insurers are refusing coverage.
The Saudis are refusing to negotiate and have already issued alerts to their navy and allied ships. It is precisely at this point that the situation could escalate, and significantly.
The European Union maintains Operation Aspides, with a strictly defensive mandate: protection of legitimate commercial traffic in the region, without authorization for strikes on Yemeni territory.
In contrast, the United Kingdom and the United States, which also operate in the area, act under separate commands with missions of an offensive nature targeting sites in Yemen.
Years ago, a coalition of around 30 ships in the region already faced difficulties containing the Houthis, who at the time possessed an arsenal inferior to the one they have today.
Now, with the ongoing conflict involving Iran, the political will led by the US could drag European countries into a broader escalation, beginning with attempts to force the reopening of the strait.
Mind you, Mr. Market will still rally based on the flimsiest of pretexts. Yesterday, it was the not-as-cheery-as-pretended news that there was diplomatic outreach to Iran, with it not even being clear whether the US was behind it or the intermediaries were spinning their wheels.
But again, what determines where ships will travel is cost and safety. Operators and crews are risk averse. Bloomberg’s landing page underscores that issue:
From Shipowners Offer Huge Bonuses to Get Crews to Sail Hormuz:
One shipowner is attempting to coax crews to sail through the Strait of Hormuz by offering them an extra six months pay if they’re willing to cross the vital oil channel, offering seafarers a stark choice between large financial rewards and the risk of death.
Sinokor Group, the world’s largest owner of supertankers, distributed such an offer to its seafarers for a round trip to pick up oil from either Saudi Arabia or Iraq and unload it in the Gulf of Oman. The firm offered six months extra salary if they make a return voyage, which it said would take about a month in total, according to a document distributed late last week and seen by Bloomberg….
“They are being offered huge bonuses by some companies,” according to Captain Pradeep Chawla, chairman of GlobalMET, a body that works with the International Maritime Organization to promote seafarer training and education, without specifically referencing the Sinokor offer. “We have heard stories of a large number of crew members getting off, but they are able to find people who are willing to go.”
Now to yet another Trump Administration desperation move that might get done:
They're going to drop a nuke on this place. Just watch. Either we are with the B-61-11 and B-61-12 gravity bombs and/or Israel will fire nuclear-tipped cruise missiles from their Dolphin-class sub. https://t.co/K3MS4e2YQM
— Brandon Weichert (@WeTheBrandon) July 21, 2026
From Wikipedia on the B61 bomb:
The B61 nuclear bomb is the primary thermonuclear gravity bomb in the United States Enduring Stockpile following the end of the Cold War. It is a low-to-intermediate yield strategic and tactical nuclear weapon featuring a two-stage radiation implosion design….
Ss of 2026, approximately 505 B61s are in service. The strategic B61-11 nuclear bunker buster is believed to be the only nuclear weapon assigned to the B-2 Spirit stealth strategic bomber, which can carry up to sixteen. The B61-12 is the only remaining US tactical nuclear weapon, with 200 stockpiled, approximately 100 in the US, and another 100 in certain European NATO member states under its nuclear sharing arrangement, maintained by munitions squadrons. The B61-12 is certified for delivery by the F-35A Lightning II stealth fifth generation fighter, and F-15E Strike Eagle, F-16 Fighting Falcon, and Panavia Tornado IDS fourth generation fighters.
More detail from a talk between Karen Kwaitkoswki and Weichert:
From a lightly edited machine transcript:
Weichert: We’ve got about 20 B61 gravity bombs, nuclear bombs at Incirlik, and Trump is Trump is fixated on Pickaxe Mountain. Now, my understanding is that Pickaxe is not fully operational yet.
Kwaitkowski: Mhm.
Weichert: Is it possible the president plans on trying to send some kind of a message to Tehran, don’t keep this going by dropping a B61-11 or 12 um on pickaxe knowing it’s kind of isolated, knowing that it’s not fully operational, but yet it would still potentially send a very serious message.
Do you think that’s possible? And what would the ramifications be?
Kwaitkowski: Yeah, I I do think it’s possible because they’re going to tell Trump, like you said, it’s remote. It’s a mountain.
They’re operating deep in the mountain.
And our B61s, we’re going to fly in there like we did along with the other big bombs, 12-day war. We’re going to fly in there. They can’t do anything.
Their air defense is zero. And then we’re going to put those things right down deep. And they’re not going to explode. They’re not going to detonate this nuclear. It’s going to be sir. It’s going to be just like an underground demonstration and you know we’ve done that for years and we’re not bound by any treaties because US just quit all of them. So we don’t have any nuclear treaties. Um we’re going to do that and and if you sold
Trump would buy that.
Trump would buy that.Weichert: Absolutely.
Kwaitkoswki: Then it’s like the biggest bomb ever
Weichert: and he’ll be remembered as that. The guy who dropped the biggest bomb ever.
Kwaitkowski: That’s right. And he’ll say he didn’t kill anybody or he only killed like you know 100 or 200 people instead of like this massive thing. And um that could be sold to Trump very easily…
The problem is um Trump knows nothing about his enemy. He seems uninterested. He lies about him constantly. Probably believes his own lies. So he thinks that that will cause them to bend the knee. Iran’s not going to bend the knee on that. No. What Iran’s going to do is they’re going to say, you know, this is our holy land. I don’t mean holy land like religious, but this is our this is Iran. This is Persia. We’re not going anywhere. We’ve been here for 3,000 years. We’re staying sacred defense. And [every] last one of us is going to die before any of us leave.
We’re are we are dying here on our land.
That’s how we’re going to do it. And uh that’s not even up for debate. So now you have dropped this unthinkable bomb.
One that that you know for all those years when I told Kohmenei was opposed to a nuclear weapon. He was opposed to it on his interpretation of Islamic code….He was against it for much more you know fundamental reasons that God was opposed to it, that Allah was opposed to it my my understanding is this is not something humans should do… humans should not have the power to destroy the planet even though we already do..
So, that’s a big important reason for them to hate the bomb. And if that’s bomb is used on them, they’re not going to run. They’re going to kneel. They’re going to say, you know, you really are the devil. You really are inhuman and un unredeemable. You know, you really are going to drown in a sea of the blood of your victims.
And back to an element of the Iran strategy raised earlier, that of political pressure. This post, The Jig is Up: How the Tribal Veto Just Eliminated MBS as a Power in Saudi Arabia, from Asiatic Global Order, is big if true. But it seems contradicted at least for now by the Saudi refusal to back down in in the dustup with Ansar Allah. Key points from the transcript:
Saudi Arabia is the last pillar that really holds the American foreign policy and power within the Middle East..
…the three entities that have supported the MBS. The military, the tribes, and finally the clerics have basically told MBS, we asked you to take up the Americans and you didn’t. …And so for the three entities that holds this kingdom together, the military, The tribes and the clergy, all three, particularly the first two, have began to shift away from MBS and in many ways, literally, literally just said, it’s time for you to go..
..the tribes in particular, remember you have the North, you have the South, you have the East, you have the West and the Central. The Northern tribes, the Shamar and the Hawitats, And in this case, the central tribe, which was the Utayaba, I apologize if I say it wrong, who, by the way, are the arm of the National Guard, came up and started blocking the roads because they were getting hit. Their argument was to the king that you had promised us stability. We have not gotten that. We are getting killed because of Israel, because of U.S., and because of these bombs. MBS ignored their warning. So what did they do?
They started with the north and the central, and eventually they closed up for the past couple of weeks or so, completely the borders
…the National Guard is not listening to the central government.
The East has been refusing to come out. So you already have two pillars telling MBS it’s time to go. The last pillar, ladies and gentlemen, was the clergy. That is the most important one. What you have, ladies and gentlemen, in the past few days, in the North, in the Central, in the South, and some in the East,
the medium and smaller mosques have literally either said MBS has to go, or they have called for the establishment of a new leader,…And why is that important? Because once you have the clerics, once you have the tribes, once you have the military, you have no one left.
Now in light of that, consider Robert Pape’s latest post, Can America Open Hormuz by the Midterms?. He of course says “no” to the headline question, but then indulges the idea that the US will conduct a limited ground operation (he does make clear it will ultimately fail). For instance:
Once the first landing succeeds, the campaign no longer revolves around reopening Hormuz. It revolves around protecting the growing American force already committed ashore.
If you read his entire post, even though he throws a lot of cold water on this sort of intervention, he still depict the US as having the means to hold on for some time, which is na ga happen.
Again, remember Herbert Stein: “If something cannot go on forever, it will stop.” We are way more limited in our military means than too many otherwise well informed commentators seem able to recognize. And that’s before considering that Mr. Market may check Trump before lack of kinetic means does.
.
____
1 Given both Iran’s and Hezbollah’s skillful use of decoys, what do you think the odds are that Iran staged a fake move of materiel?
2 Ahmadian discusses the continuing US/Israel efforts to increase domestic pressure starting at 46:00:
From Ahmadian in a lightly cleaned up machine transcript:
The third announcement came from Trump himself, President Trump. He said we sent in arms in January. He said it very clearly with no you can’t just interpret his words.
We sent arms to help the Iranians that is to help the opposition to bring down the system. And so we have a clear image as to what happened in January and that never stopped afterwards. We on a daily basis, on a weekly basis, we hear many reports of Iranian security forces seizing arms that are coming from border places in Iran. Arresting people who bring them in. An effort by the Israelis to weaponize the Iranian street.
As opposed to that, what is the what are the authorities in Tehran doing? Banking on the street as well, that is having people in the street trying to diffuse any effort by the Israelis and the Americans to move the streets in a way that is similar to January 2026…
You know economics is front and center when it comes comes to the Iranian streets. The Americans and the Israelis focused on the economics to put pressure on the Iranian streets, basically collectively punishing them for them to move against their administration, their government, their authorities on the behest of Israel and the United States. That didn’t happen in the war and I don’t see it happening moving forward.
But that’s a bet also another losing bet for the Israelis and the Americans. Now, the Iranians are under pressure. And when you look at the rhetoric from the Iranian authorities dealing with the United States, you could see that their main focus is Iran’s economics.
If there is no outcome, economic, financial outcome for Iran in this negotiations, as I said earlier, I don’t see any logic for the Iranians to deal with the United States after what it did in the country. Their main aim is for the oil embargo to be lifted and the uh frozen assets to be freed, get back to the country and have a change in the economics of the country because that would benefit Iranians as opposed to the collective punishment that has been there uh in the form of the maximum pressure and then in the form of you know multiple wars.
The war came in with more pressure, economic pressure on the society, but it’s really not that different. You know, people usually resort to, you know, generic talking points about Iran being under pressure, but when you look at the indicators, they talk about the depreciation of the value of the currency. But if you look at it before, right before the war and right after the war, you’d see that it gained actually 2 to 3% of value. If you look at the inflation, it didn’t really change that much before the war and after the war.
It’s still high.There is pressure on the ordinary Iranians and on the society, but it doesn’t mean that the war changed the entirety of the equation. It brought in more pressure per se. The pressure was there. Maximum pressure basically sanctioned the entirety of the Iranian economics, financial sectors, everything. And they got to a to a level that because there’s nothing to basically sanction, they’re sanctioning people. They sanction you know entities that have nothing to do with economics because they don’t have much to sanction anymore in Iran.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see this war fizzle out. Trump is really good at distraction, so he could do something else completely outrageous, to distract the American people from the fact of a withdrawal. It seems like they’re already setting up Hegseth and/or Caine to take the blame.
As for dropping a nuke, I doubt he understands just how much of a disaster that would be for the U.S. and Israel. I wonder how much pushback there would be from within the military. Hopefully we don’t have to find out.
That is not really an option if Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz, as it will. You can’t distract from that.
To clarify, I’m not saying that he would succeed, but I wouldn’t be surprised to see him try something really crazy as a distraction. There’s the real world, and the world that exists in Trump’s head, and we have ample evidence at which one guides U.S. policy. Anything but admit that he failed.
That is why I don’t see fizzle out. There are no voices of opposition in the inner circle. Many of the voices are muddles with religious fervor. More Testosterone, More Aggression. Ironic from those who ascribe to the common faith message of Moar Love.
I never gamed out the Jackpot with Nukes. Thought it was solely resource and environmental degradation.
As to underground nuke test equivalent strategic strike, I don’t think anyone has tested into a concentration of enriched ‘dust’.
What a bunch of perverted selfish dunces we have running our show.
There certainly appears to be no we in US. Hey, that could be a Green Party bumper sticker:
Putting the we back in US
You can t “distract” from the Iran’s control of the Strait of Hormuz any more than someone could “distract” themselves and others from a major amputation. I am ashamed by my difficulty in behaving normally (either looking overly long or too obviously averting my eyes) when encountering someone who lost a leg.
A pretext for and implementing martial law or blatant interference or accusations that Cuba or China does in the famous midterms?
They need a pretext?
Would it be that much of a disaster though? Who is going to hold the USA Israel accountable for dropping a WMD? Chuck Schumer and the Democrats? Macron? The Labour Party?
Nukes have limited to almost no military value – that is almost completely psychological. Using them would cross a psychological threshold. We wouldn’t be able to see the impact of that usage, because it would be occurring in peoples’ minds. How would that affect policy towards the U.S. and Israel? It’s impossible to say, but there would almost certainly be an impact. It’s quite telling that no nukes have ever been used in a conflict since World War II, and that’s because policy makers intuitively understand the psychological impact of using them, if not quite what that would be.
Nukes have solid military value against a target inside a mountain. Political fallout negates this value, though.
Drop a nuke on a Muslim country and suffer no consequences? Can’t really see that happening.
Assuming that doesn’t trigger World War III right then.
I’m more worried that he will try something really stoopid after Labor Day, e.g. an October Surprise.
Imagine him still polling in the basement, with no SAVE act, nothing to show the voters, high inflation, $5 gas in the deep south, and Mike Johnson applying for a job at a Stuckey’s off of I-10.
He might try a ground invasion, hoping to get the “rally round the flag” vote out.
I don’t think it would work, but that doesn’t mean he won’t try it. Remember, we’re dealing with a mentally deranged narcissist.
All done! If you arrived before the time of this comment, please re-load this page and re-skim.
Yves, your work in sifting, sorting, organizing, and juxtaposing, all this information, is quite simply wildly impressive. Thank you again.
Thank you, Yves.
Thanks again, always my first read. And thanks for this from the intro,
They are ignoring that pressures in any of these systems, or across systems, can and likely will generate sudden, large dislocations.
This idea is often overlooked or ignored, yet seems baked in to our petro addicted existence, and it will only amplify the economic destruction. This threatens to be a “tipping point” of some sort, although I know not to where.
I really don’t understand this talk of Israel launching a nuke against Iran from a Dolphin-class submarine. The problem there is that that nuke would have a return address – Israel. And as a nuke is a weapon of mass destruction (remember those), Iran would launch an equivalent attack on Israel which would mean infrastructure like water purification plants, energy grid infrastructure, airports, seaports, etc. which would send the whole country into a crisis at the same moment that their political leadership is in turmoil. It would mean hundreds of thousands of Israelis having to flee Israel all at the same time as water runs short. Will Egypt open the borders for them? Do the Israelis really want to find out?
G-d forbid they should flee their moral s*^&#hole of a country and return to the States (though admittedly that would be karmic payback for enabling them all this time), further poisoning the polity here. Hard to imagine the Russians would want them back either.
Better they stew in their own foul juices and cannibalize each other.
Optimistic of you to assume Ben Gurion Airport would be operational for all those Long Islanders
No and that is why we are starting to see the same pushback from all u.s. allies in West Asia. In Israel there was the no more planes at Ben Gurion airport, and now Smoltrech is saying Israel is not interested in getting back involved in the war on Iran. Likewise Saudi no longer wants the u.s. using its bases. As Iran destroys the bases in each Gulf state, I doubt the rebuilding will commence anytime soon, most likely never.
Geopolitically this will be a shift going back to the 1930s when Roosevelt made a deal with the Saudis. The ripples from this will extend globally.
A thing I’ve seen no comments on anywhere: most of – not all of – the ground-penetrating bombs about which the US made such a fuss in June 2025 are puny compared to the “Blockbusters” the RAF used successfully against Germany in 1944-45. Why?
Consider the Vietnam War: when I asked an apparently expert blogger why the US didn’t destroy North Vietnam’s railways and, particularly, bridges and tunnels he said that it was very difficult to destroy such linear targets. But the RAF had shown how to do it a couple of decades earlier. Did the US not have any ground-penetrating bombs in the sixties?
So why on earth has the US persisted with using bombs that just aren’t man enough for the job? I’ll grant that the task of bombing Iranian granite is harder than bombing German earth but the requirement of a bloody big bomb is surely the same? The RAF’s Lancasters carried a ten ton bomb. I learn from Google that only the GBU-57 is bigger; the other American “bunker busters” are only 5,000 lb or 2,000 lb. How did people persuade themselves that such little things would do much good against deep, hard rock? Or did it not occur to them that you don’t get to choose your opponent’s geology?
Those “blockbusters” were dropped from planes flying over Germany. Most US bombs need to be dropped while flying over the targets. Which the US still cannot do freely over Iran. Because the bombers would be shot down.
There does appear to be an earth-penetrating munition, the “Massive Ordnance Penetrator”, that is on the scale of the WWII precedent you mention
A limitation on its use appears to be “available inventory”; some were already employed in B-2 raid of June 2025. It also may, as Martina notes, currently be undeliverable if US is unable to thoroughly suppress Iranian air defenses.
It would be a really bad look for the Trump regime if the Iranians got to show the crash site of a B-2 bomber to international journalists. Even worse if the Iranian captured the crew.
It rather looks like another coordinated set of leaks from the Pentagon to get through to Trump that they can’t offer him any moves that they don’t want to play.
Robert Barnes explained that Trump’s staff can’t give him bad news or tell him things he doesn’t like as he just flies into a rage. To get certain information into his head you have to leak it to the press. And it very much looked like that’s how the first 40 days of fighting ended shortly after a set of weirdly specific information about munition stocks and depletion and replenishment rates/costs went to a number of (wanna say 3 but not sure) mainstream US news orgs.
For Trump, if it doesn’t appear on Fox News then it is only fake news.
Peter certainly isn’t going to deliver that bad news. So, instead leak it to the one thing we know he reads – the New York Times.
I get the impression from Michael Wolff (but this seems confirmed in DJT’s interview with Usha Vance about his reading habits) that DJT’s interest in NYT is primarily in items about himself. So the leak strategy may work best if the information gets into a story that is at least superficially about DJT. I suppose that this is not difficult to do; one could imagine items headlined with something like “President Trump faced with difficult decisions due to [XYZ situation described in the leaked information].”
It seems to have something of the character of “intelligence briefing of POTUS via leaks to the press.”
What a crazy time.
‘DeBasification… A Fancy Word for Booting the US Out of the Middle East’
This is starting to sound like some grand chess game. The Iranians make a move, the US has to pull out of Bahrain, Kuwait and Quatar and abandons those squares. The Iranians make another move and the US has to pull back to Jordan. The Iranians hit Jordan good and hard – Çheck!’ The US, having run out of squares, is forced to move to Israel. Checkmate? With the amount of planes all crammed together in Israel and nowhere enough shelters, you would only need a one-eyed monkey hanging from a balloon to drop a hand grenade to cause utter chaos.
You left out the step where Iran says ” if you do x we will do y”. US does x. Iran does y.
Debassification – No Geddy Lee, Bootsy Collins, or Sting?
Music would not be the same without the bottom end.
Sooo, no USO tours at these bases anymore? Where’s Bob Hope when you need him?
On the road… / ;)
Heh! Heh! Heh! Along with the old crooner.
Jaco!! Jaco Pastorius and others backing Joni Mitchell. Live Shadows and Light tour. 1 hr 13 mins.
https://youtu.be/xrAs7-LT6VE?list=RDxrAs7-LT6VE must view- Yes it IS art!
MBGA – Make Bass Great Again
Cheryl Lynn – Got To Be Real
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fI569nw0YUQ&list=RDEr9xGRolrT4
Check out timestamp @ 4:10!
thank you for the musical link, it’s superb playing.
Les Claypool?
I remember it as if it were a meal ago.
Blistering rock alert.
Looks like Abdullah II skipped town for the UK. I wonder if he will wear fatigues while in London.
From Due Dissidence:
Iran STRIKES Gulf States as Trump Signals DISASTROUS ESCALATION of War
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41vGG0JRpDg
Minor typo, “What happens to all those financial glash points”
I like the idea of a global clash point – a glash point!
It’s the point at which the reflecting pool liner was attacked? That Davey Hearn is a MENACE!
Lordy
Perfect setup to update the plot of Wages of Fear for the 21st Century!
The script practically writes itself.
Somewhat tangential, but since you mentioned a script:
We are watching the 2nd season of Silo on Apple TV. It’s a dystopian sci fi series set in an underground bunker of mysterious origin and history with careful controls on the population’s knowledge and communications etc. We appreciate the way it resonates with old Twilight Zone plots.
Anyway this season there is a new backstory(?) emerging that implicates a mysterious war with Iran. Zionist propaganda? Or Anti? There are several episodes left.
The show has me wondering if there will be influence on more movies and TV shows. Are we about to see a whole new set of Iranian/Palestinian supervillains?
Excellent idea!
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2025/06/the-sunday-morning-movie-presents-sorcerer-1977-run-time-1h-58m.html
The Monty Python movie “The Life of Brian” ends with a group of people being crucified while singing “Always look on the bright side of life.”
On that note, though the war rages, it’s mentioned in the text, “And again, the US is not merely being shown as unable to protect commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz. It is also being systematically turfed out of the theater.”
If Iran, which is up to its eyeballs with economic problems, can still put the US out of business in West Asia with a revolutionary approach to warfare, then obviously, no other power will be able to take its place; at least not with a dominant military presence.
In other words, the world might be a more peaceful place if small or middle powers possess efficient and inexpensive weapons that serve as an effective deterrent against the big guys.
As a member of BRICS, Iran could pretty much lead the way toward this eventuality.
Trump’s off-ramp for this war will be domestic policy. State of emergency, crackdown on “leftists”, or invading Cuba
See Ken Kilippenstein’s latest reports, including Rubio’s recent declarations.
I did have that thought, and Rubio’s et als comments on this are ominous. Once these guys learn they hard way they can’t bully other nations, or at least the nations they want to bully, where do they go? I doubt they see the light and reform themselves, or get a hobby. It will be war on their own citizens. They only fight people who won’t/can’t fight back. They thought that would be Iran, but they were wrong.
It’s incredible they thought it would be Iran, given how badly it went when they tried it the first time, but I guess what they lack in brainpower, they make up for with sheer brutality.
Working in the white House right now must be quite an experience as Trump continues to deteriorate.
Susie Wiles’ job is to “Manage” Trump and she’s doing the best she can, and it ain’t enough.
Between the pouting, the flights of rage and the grandiose fantasies of World Domination it’s a very special place to work.
It appears that the “Eye of Sauron” is being turned on the US Populace and that’s going to have some unintended effects as Mr Market swoons.
The AI bubble has started to deflate, it was counting on big $ from Japan and the Gulf which will not be forthcoming.
It’s a heck of a show.
Riffing on the systemic failure (the AI bubble is there too), here is a 30,000 foot question: After debasing the US from West Asia, will it stop there, or continue to Cyprus and Italy/Romania, etc.? These bases are within Iran’s reach, and the useless interceptors (which could stop drones) are gone. I think Russia would be a big supporter – they might coordinate by hitting Germany. My SWAG is that once the US loses in West Asia, the route will extend to Western Europe.
FYI – when I was in college back in the day at GA Tech, one of my friends, a civil engineering student, told me that for his class, they had calculated that 10 feet of reinforced concrete would stop a direct hit by a nuke. Iranian engineers are top-notch, and I am sure have 30 feet (or 100 feet) of concrete (as blast diverters) strategically placed below (say 150 feet) the entrance (allowing for say 50 m penetration).
I hadn’t really thought before you mentioned this, about the possibility that it would be Iran, and not Russia, that strikes a US presence in a NATO country, thus triggering an Article 5 crisis. Iran can justifiably state that no attack from US forces stationed anywhere will go unanswered. The US is pretty much all in already (ex nukes), so the only additional escalation would come from Europe. Provided that there is any teeth to what NATO members see as “such action as it deems necessary”.
And what does Europe have to offer? The US already has twice as many destroyers in theater as Britain has in total. NATO air forces would presumably need to use most of the same US bases that the US is currently losing in the GCC. There is no realistic probability that European countries would send ground forces into Iran, especially while the US is exclusively playing an air-war game. And any actions NATO members would take would only weaken Europe’s position against what they see as an inevitable direct confrontation with Russia.
I had not considered it would be Iran, and not Russia, that breaks NATO.
If debasification works for Iran, DPRK can start with Yokosuka!
North Korea has probably taken notes. If the US starts a shooting war on the peninsular, every US base in South Korea and Japan will be toast which will automatically cripple any military operations. And does the US have the air defense missiles to defend those bases any more?
Iran has been so measured in its responses though, as noted here on NC several times, that I just don’t see them escalating this situation like that (i.e. hitting U.S. assets in continental Europe). Italy already withdrew from Iraq and said they want no part in this; Spain has not been supportive of the U.S. (at least officially) by denying the use of their airspace; the rest of Europe declined to get involved in Trump’s demands they help open the Strait. Why would Iran provoke them?
Let’s consider winning for the US. I understand the consensus is that the US can’t win, but let’s think about what winning would look like.
Iran’s regime falls. Iran breaks apart into ethnic separatist enclaves each engaged in civil war against each other. Whatever Iranian regime emerges is paralyzed for a decade putting down internal revolts, and Israel doesn’t have to consider Iran in any of its planning. Hezbollah and Hamas and Houthis lose any support from Iran.
First, before the US gets there, most of the GCC energy infrastructure is wiped out, and world depression.
Second, US bases in the region are totally destroyed, and I doubt much of Israel will remain.
Third, US has no serious offensive missile capabilities short of nukes and isn’t getting rare earths from China.
This means the US is effectively out the region, world economy is toast, probable financial contagion from the economic crisis ravaging the financial markets, US has no real offensive capability to challenge Russia or China, and no prospects of getting it back for a decade. In other words, the US can only gamble on a potential defeat of Iran if it commits to defeating itself before it gets to the table. Further, Israel is screwed because the Turks are well positioned to threaten them, and Big Brother is knocked out of Eurasia. Are we sick of winning yet? Further, this “victory” is in probably at the extreme tail of likely outcomes if the US continues to escalate, most likely Iran wins, controls Hormuz, recovers and grows more powerful, with all the consequent damage to the US backed in to the outcome.
I understand that the US is not “irrational”–Trump is making very stupid decisions in the long-term for short-term reasons of political posturing. But this is the decision-making process generally witnessed in drug addicts in the throes of desperation and ultra-violent criminals fleeing law enforcement.
“…Alastair Crooke confirmed on Judge Napolitano yesterday, Iran is systematically pushing the US out of based on the Gulf, with the US trying to retreat to Jordan. The next phase is to force the US out of Jordan to Israel, which will then set up the systematic destruction of military assets there…”
I wouldn’t hold my breath for that one.
He’s saying all the other Z loving elites governing or controlling the biggest countries are going to sit back and let Iran light up Israel ( a country not isolated from trade and other partnerships with major powers) and then take its place among the ruling powers.
As stated earlier…this #$%& won’t be developing in a linear fashion for any of the parties involved.
Surprises all around to come.
Totally agree that this mess isn’t going to proceed in a linear or organized fashion. It will be more like an engine seizing up. We’ll go from intense action, overheating, to dead stop, can’t move, need to rebuild the entire thing, very quickly.
I agree that no one on Team TINA is going to sit back and let events unfold so that Iran becomes the fourth world power as Pape has been discussing. But, the question is, what can they really do about it? We are practically out of missiles. A manned invasion would be a disaster. None of the zionists in question have personal armies to lend to the cause. The Pentagon appears to really not want this war. So, who is left to storm the gates and do this?
I can see a raid developing. I can see false claims and bravado shielding Trump from having to publicly admit the size of his defeat. I can’t see anyone with any ability to do anything about it. The only thing we’re arguing over now is how much damage will be done before we agree that reality is real.
It’s not going to be about missiles. Weapons and weapon systems increase the cost of participation in “world power games”.
The games are about which countries will be able to project power in a variety of ways and across many theatres for extended periods of time.
The administration has not retreated from West Asia. So they don’t see any defeat.
“Mr. Market will still rally based on the flimsiest of pretexts.”
It occurred to me watching the market skyrocket and implied volatility getting pounded down, that the financial markets are a battle space in the minds of our overlords. Bessent’s assertion that they can just sell oil futures to stitch up any inconvenience in supply indicates not only a willingness to interfere with price discovery mechanisms, but also an admission before the fact.
The assets of the current configuration of the American economy, skyscrapers filled with phds and dedicated floors of high speed computers and communication networks all focused on infinitesimal market squiggles are being deployed to demonstrate invulnerability to the nuisances of Iran’s trivial activities.
Perhaps it might even be equivalent to a few more carrier groups. Admiral Kenny on the USS Citadel and the bloodthirsty boys manipulating prices with the glee of curtis lemay. One wonders what trump offered them in exchange, and when exactly the American people will be finally presented with the butchers bill.
Pentagon hiding missile shortage from White House, insiders fear (Telegraph)
Extract:
The Pentagon is hiding the scale of missile shortages from the White House, insiders fear.
The US president is under pressure to hit back at Iran after the deaths of three US service members over the weekend.
But rumours are spreading across the administration that the Pentagon is concealing a shortage of interceptor missiles, which are needed to resume the war. There are also suggestions that the White House does not want to know about the scale of the shortfall.
Sharing “bad news, or realistic news, doesn’t seem to end well for anybody”, an insider told The Telegraph. Another said a “culture of silence” was causing problems for Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary.
One source said the Pentagon was growing convinced that the way to unblock the Strait of Hormuz was by escalating the conflict and becoming more aggressive. [BP: Good luck with that!]
US stockpiles are a closely guarded secret within the administration, with relatively few people having access to the information. The question now being raised is whether they are being kept fully informed.
A source told The Telegraph that a culture of silence had taken hold as Mr Hegseth had acquired a reputation for purging senior members of the military.
“I question how honest the Pentagon is being with [Mr Hegseth] or the White House, since bad news, or realistic news, doesn’t seem to end well for anybody,” the individual said.
“Everybody is doing the best they can to keep the [department] running as efficiently as possible for the sake of our troops, in spite of the chaos factor above us – and also keep our heads in the process.”
Another source said: “This culture of silence has been a problem [for Hegseth] since he shrunk his circle to just a handful of individuals.
“When he advises the president, or when he goes to Congress, he doesn’t have full information because his top aides are trying to stay off his radar.”
Mike Duffey, who would take a key role in replenishing missile stock as the Pentagon’s under-secretary for acquisition, is a “nice guy” but “very loath to bring bad news to Pete” and “pretty much stays out of his orbit”, the source added.
A US official told the Washington Post that the US was “planning for a wider war” but that this would be limited by dwindling stockpiles of air defences and long-range munitions.
“We do not have enough to safely sustain operations, and I don’t think the White House is aware of that,” the official said.