Israel Is Acting with Impunity. Is It Overconfident in Trump’s Support?

Yves here. This post gives some of the high points on how Israel has continued with its utterly depraved genocide in Gaza. But it insultingly dignifies Netanyahu as ready to move on to the next phases of the peace headfake when there has been not a single day when Israel has complied with the ceasefire. Similarly, it tries to depict the removal of Tony Blair from the Trump peace scheme “board of peace” it bizarrely acts as if that’s a minor negative for Netanyahu. Huh? The Israel focus is the extermination or removal of Palestinians from their expansive notion of Israel’s boundaries. They know that talk of governance schemes is just empty prattle.

What is the reason for what comes awfully close to apologetics for Israel from Paul Rogers? Are commentators in the UK that afraid of seeming too Palestine friendly by being correctly critical of Israel? Is this an example of the chilling effect of the detention of George Galloway under the Anti-Terrorism Act?

It’s grating to see Rogers try to end on a note of hopium. Trump is a true believer in his policies and doubles down, as we see on all sorts of fronts, from the economy to ICE, when polls show they are hemorrhaging support. If Trump wanted to send a shot across Israel’s bow, he would have recalled his cringe-worthy ambassador Mike Huckabee after meeting with Jason Pollard:

No, Trump believes in the Israel project. His favorite daughter Ivana converted to become an Orthodox Jew. Trump is also a loud and proud supporter of ethno-supremacism in South Africa. He’s not giving up Israel, even before getting to the importance of Zionist donors to him,

By Paul Rogers, Emeritus Professor of Peace Studies in the Department of Peace Studies and International Relations at Bradford University, and an Honorary Fellow at the Joint Service Command and Staff College. He is openDemocracy’s international security correspondent. He is on Twitter at: @ProfPRogers. Originally published at openDemocracy

Two months into Israel and Hamas’s ‘ceasefire’, the name is already proving a misnomer. Violence continues in Gaza, where more than 360 Palestinians, including as many as 70 children, and three Israeli soldiers have been killed since 10 October.

Most of the Palestinians killed were families who were ‘collateral damage’ of Israeli aircraft and drone strikes on buildings, ruins or tents in pursuit of individual Hamas paramilitaries. Despite this, prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu has suggested Israel is ready to move to the next phase of the 20-point Gaza peace plan put forward by Donald Trump.

Reports from Washington, though, indicate that the plan itself is undergoing changes.

Tony Blair was this week quietly dropped from Trump’s “board of peace”, a technocratic administration of the self-proclaimed global great and good to oversee Gaza’s governance, according to the Financial Times.

The former UK prime minister was widely expected to play a major role in the programme, possibly even leading it, but some Arab and Muslim states are said to have argued that his support for and involvement in the 2003 US assault on Iraq made him an unfit candidate.

While this is no doubt a blow for Blair, for Netanyahu, it is just a minor setback. Israel is already setting the agenda on the ground, and the prime minister is confident in Trump remaining faithful due to the voting power of the many millions of Christian Zionists in the US.

His confidence can be seen in several instances of Israel acting with impunity.

First, Netanyahu has essentially annexed the majority of Gaza in a sleight of hand.

Close to two million Palestinians have been forced into the small strip of mostly ruined urban areas along the coast, known as the Red Zone, while Israeli troops occupy the Green Zone, which makes up 58% of Gaza. Yellow concrete posts mark the divide between the two, which the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) already consider to be Israel’s new border with Gaza.

Then there is Israel’s reported spying on the international security forces present at the Civil-Military Coordination Centre, the ceasefire-monitoring centre established by the US at Kiryat Gat in southern Israel, just 20 kilometres from Gaza, since 10 October.

The centre’s several hundred uniformed and civilian foreign staff are tasked with aid and logistic coordination, after the abandonment of the previous and much-criticised US/Israeli private aid distribution system. But press reports suggest tensions, with some foreign teams reportedly avoiding revealing sensitive information due to Israeli surveillance, which the base’s US commander, Patrick Frank, has called on Israeli officials to put a stop to.

Meanwhile, beyond Gaza, the IDF and the Israeli police are seen to have free rein in their treatment of the three million Palestinians in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem. One recent example was the shooting dead of two Palestinians who had surrendered

Since Israel’s war in Gaza started two years ago, more than a thousand Palestinians in the West Bank have been killed, while in the past 12 months, around 32,000 people have been forced from their homes in refugee camps in the north of the West Bank.

At least 34 families, totalling 175 people, currently face eviction from their houses in Batn al-Hawa, East Jerusalem, by an Israeli settler group.

“Israeli military operations have forced entire communities in areas of the northern West Bank into lockdown in their homes, keeping children out of school, jeopardising family incomes and increasing risk of physical violence and child detention from the Israeli military,” said a statement last month by Save the Children, a charity that first offered support for Palestinians in 1953 and has been a permanent presence in the region for the past 50 years.

The organisation concluded that “the futures of an entire generation are being jeopardised”, pointing to disastrous prospects for Palestinian children due to restrictions on aid, settler violence, house demolitions, land confiscation and the destruction of infrastructure.

And given Netanyahu’s determination to stay in power at least until next year’s general election, it is difficult to see an early end to the grim Palestinian predicament.

As I have previously argued in these columns, the Gaza conflict will have a longer-term, multi-generational impact on Palestinians and will most certainly not give Israeli Jews the security they desire – indeed, quite the opposite, as more traumatised and grieving Palestinians come round to Hamas’s cause.

In the more immediate future, though, one recent trend is already surprising independent analysts: the marked decrease in the US public’s support for Israel. “A majority of Americans now disapprove of the IDF’s actions in Gaza,” and, more telling still, “for the first time more support the Palestinians than Israel”, according to a report in Le Monde Diplomatique this month.

So, while for now, Netanyahu is right to be confident in Trump’s unflinching support, the US president’s attitude may change abruptly if he starts to think his domestic reputation is being threatened.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

2 comments

  1. motorslug

    Even with multitudes of MAGAts despising all the money and favoritism given to israel, not to mention their outright anti-jewish views, there is very little Trump can do – even if he wanted (which is laughable). Zionazis have such a stranglehold on all facets of the US system that he would be shut down immediately, if not ‘epsteined’.
    And why is the article framed in present tense? Israel has always acted with impunity, especially since they got away with the slaughter of servicemembers on the USS liberty.

    Reply
  2. Sunlight

    … the US president’s attitude may change abruptly if he starts to think his domestic reputation is being threatened.

    This is quackery because his “domestic reputation” is already threatened by his allegiance to Netanyahu … and Trump doesn’t seem to care.

    Trump’s abject prostration to Netanyahu is part of why some Conservatives have split with him. They feel betrayed by this “America First” “populist outsider” much like Progressives felt betrayed by “Change You Can Believe In” Obama (no public option; no investigations of Bush Admin lies or rendition & torture; made most of the Bush tax cuts permanent; secret wars; HAMP; etc.).

    What took Conservatives so long? LOL. Trump clearly lied/dissembled about self-funding, “draining the swamp”, defending free speech; “fighting the Deep State”; his oh-so close association with Epstein; being a peacemaker; and other matters.

    Are we done with “populist outsiders” now? Can we move on to real political reform?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *